Author Topic: How about a Fw 200C-3 bomber  (Read 1541 times)

Offline Meatwad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12725
How about a Fw 200C-3 bomber
« on: October 03, 2006, 12:23:53 AM »
FW 200C-3 Condor, long range German bomber

Typed word for word (not taylorese) from the book "Aircraft of World War 2" You can find more info about it online by searching.

In the early years of World War II, the long range Focke-Wulf Condor was a far greater threat to Allied shipping then the German U-boats, which were not fully deployed.

Originally developed to meet an unfulfilled Japanese requirement, the Focke Wulf FW 200 Condor was a maritime bomber/reconnaissance version  of the pre-war civil airliner, production of which has been taken over by the Luftwaffe. The first unit to receive the production FW-200C-1 was the Luftwaffe's Long-Range Reconnaissance Squadron (Fernaufklarungsstaffel), which began operations in April 1940 and was redesigned I/KG 40 later in the month.
     
The next variant, the FW-200C-2, differed from the C-1 in having two bomb racks of improved design under each wing. A structurally strengthened version, the FW 200C-3, was placed in production by mid 1941, and this variant of the Condor was produced in greater numbers then its predecessors.

AIR-TO-SURFACE MISSLE (AH2 will never see, but the bomber would be great without it.)
The final operational version of the Condor was the Fw 200 C-6, developed from the C-3 to carry a Henschel Hs 293B air to surface missle under each outer nacelle, the underwing bomb racks being removed. The combination of Hs 293 and Fw 200 was the first used operationally on December 28, 1943. The total number of Condors produced during the war years was 252 aircraft. Many were relegated to transport duties n 1942, nine being lost in attempts to resupply the German garrison at Stalingrad.

Technical information for Fw 200C-3

Powerplant: Four 895kW (1200hp) BMW-Bramo 323R-2 Fafnir nine-cylinder radial engines (FW 200C-3/U4)

Performance: makimum speed 360km/h (224mph) at 4700m (15,420ft). Service ceiling 6000m (19,685ft). Range 4440km (2759 miles)

Weights: Empty 17,005kg (37,496lbs), maximum take-off 22,700kg (50,044lb)

Dimensions: Wing span 32.84m (107ft 8in), length 23.85m (78ft 3in), height 6.30m (20ft 8in)

Armament: Two 7.92mm machine guns, three 12.7mm machine guns and one 20mm machine gun, plus an maximum internal and enternal bomb load of 2100kg (4630lb)

The forward firing 7.92 (0.31 in) MG 15 in the fully enclosed forward cupola (below) was manned by the co-pilot when the aircraft was threatened by frontal attack. The rear fuselage area was used as a storage for small stores like flares, light buoys, and direction finding buoys. These were dropped through a hatch in the fuselage underside.







The forward gondola gun position (above) mounted an Oerlikon 20mm FF cannon. The protruding object on the bottom of the forward gondola gun (below) is a Lofte 7D bomb sight.
 



The condors weapons bay was situated in the ventral gondola (above); the rear gun position immediately behind it was manned by the flight engineer. On armed reconnaissance missions, however, four 250kg bombs were normally carried. Two on the outboard engine nacelles and two on the wing racks.
See Rule 19- Do not place sausage on pizza.
I am No-Sausage-On-Pizza-Wad.
Das Funkillah - I kill hangers, therefore I am a funkiller. Coming to a vulchfest near you.
You cant tie a loop around 400000 lbs of locomotive using a 2 foot rope - Drediock on fat women

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23046
How about a Fw 200C-3 bomber
« Reply #1 on: October 03, 2006, 11:41:02 AM »
Mmmmm, Mosquito food.

A plane so weak it sometimes broke it's back on landing.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Mustaine

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4139
How about a Fw 200C-3 bomber
« Reply #2 on: October 03, 2006, 12:41:33 PM »
it had a hella long range....

there was a mission they were going to bombe the panama canal out of service, but they war ended before they could do it.

I suggested it quite a while back, still think it would make a nice addition.


seems we lost some old suggestion posts, this forum only goes back to 2005, the "old" suggestion forum was where I posted. guess when they renamed or remade this one those posts were lost :furious I went through alot of trouble back they to type that whole post out. has like 5 planes in it, the condor, the re.2005 and I can't remember exactly which others, the he111, and some other more common suggestions IIRC.
Genetically engineered in a lab, and raised by wolverines -- ]V[ E G A D E T ]-[
AoM DFC ZLA BMF and a bunch of other acronyms.

Offline Meatwad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12725
How about a Fw 200C-3 bomber
« Reply #3 on: October 03, 2006, 01:10:50 PM »
I have a big book of WW2 aircraft, tonight if I have time I may do one on the He-111 or another that we dont have right now. If I do, I will try and get as much data/info as above if not more
See Rule 19- Do not place sausage on pizza.
I am No-Sausage-On-Pizza-Wad.
Das Funkillah - I kill hangers, therefore I am a funkiller. Coming to a vulchfest near you.
You cant tie a loop around 400000 lbs of locomotive using a 2 foot rope - Drediock on fat women

Offline army900

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 50
How about a Fw 200C-3 bomber
« Reply #4 on: October 04, 2006, 09:43:32 PM »
How about the early war B-17. I mean come on, lancs perked out and 88s the only other varible. The b-17s coming into pearl when the japs hit wouldnt be to bad. They we'rent excalcty the same but lets get some good bombers in the EWA. I would actaully like to fly in there soem time!!! :aok

Offline scottydawg

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1759
      • http://www.332nd.org
How about a Fw 200C-3 bomber
« Reply #5 on: October 05, 2006, 01:33:33 PM »
I think the HE-111 would be ideal for EW.  Strategic bombing and the big boys hadn't really shown up yet, perhaps a B-25 as well.

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23046
How about a Fw 200C-3 bomber
« Reply #6 on: October 05, 2006, 01:44:32 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by scottydawg
I think the HE-111 would be ideal for EW.  Strategic bombing and the big boys hadn't really shown up yet, perhaps a B-25 as well.

Vickers Wellington B.Mk III would be ideal.  Slow (240ish top speed) so it can be caught, defended by .303  turrets, tough as heck and carries a useful war load (4,500lbs).
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline army900

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 50
How about a Fw 200C-3 bomber
« Reply #7 on: October 05, 2006, 05:58:35 PM »
I wouldnt mind either, but would like to have an HE-111, and would die for a B-25!

Offline scottydawg

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1759
      • http://www.332nd.org
How about a Fw 200C-3 bomber
« Reply #8 on: October 05, 2006, 06:00:26 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Karnak
Vickers Wellington B.Mk III would be ideal.  Slow (240ish top speed) so it can be caught, defended by .303  turrets, tough as heck and carries a useful war load (4,500lbs).


Yes, but do you know WHY it was so tough and hard to kill?

Offline army900

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 50
How about a Fw 200C-3 bomber
« Reply #9 on: October 05, 2006, 06:00:48 PM »
The EWA would get so much more traffic if we had some better planes! I was playing last night and was porking and had nobody afer me except unmanned ack. Major Porkage!!!

Offline scottydawg

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1759
      • http://www.332nd.org
How about a Fw 200C-3 bomber
« Reply #10 on: October 05, 2006, 06:05:05 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by army900
The EWA would get so much more traffic if we had some better planes! I was playing last night and was porking and had nobody afer me except unmanned ack. Major Porkage!!!


They have those in MW and LW.  I stay away from LW because the dweebage factor is really high in there. But I agree that the EWA would benefit most from some new planes, as long as they were in line with the timelines of the arena.

The plane set in the EW and MW give them both a much different (and imo, better) character than the LW arena.

"Build it, they will come", indeed. We'll see.  I hope that the LW arena becomes sort of an advanced TA, people will leave there once they've mastered the easy mode planes and are looking for more of a challenge and less noise.

Offline VooWho

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1214
How about a Fw 200C-3 bomber
« Reply #11 on: October 05, 2006, 06:11:27 PM »
The Condor would be an awsome CV killer in the EW arena. It looks like its got some good defencive armaments, and carriers a good load. The He111 would also be awsome in the EW, or maybe the Do-17z. B-25 would be so awsome, and maybe the vickers wellington.

I vote Yes for the Condor.
Non Sibi Sed Patriae!

Offline army900

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 50
How about a Fw 200C-3 bomber
« Reply #12 on: October 05, 2006, 06:18:49 PM »
I agree with both of you...:aok

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23046
How about a Fw 200C-3 bomber
« Reply #13 on: October 06, 2006, 09:58:05 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by scottydawg
Yes, but do you know WHY it was so tough and hard to kill?

Yes, the geodetic (sp?) and fabric construction invented by Barnes Wallis of Dambusters fame.

He also designed the 12,000lb and 22,000lb bombs people often request for the Lanc.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline VooWho

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1214
How about a Fw 200C-3 bomber
« Reply #14 on: October 06, 2006, 09:24:10 PM »
Condor
Non Sibi Sed Patriae!