Endorsing the axiom that one ought to train with what one would fight with, I'm trying to find if it's realistic to have one brand and type of ammo for both plinking or target shooting as well as home defense.
I realize it makes a huge difference what caliber/gauge we're talking about. I'm trying to standardize on just a few, i.e., .22LR, .30 Carbine, .357/.38, and 12-gauge.
It's easiest, of course, in the most affordable ammo such as .22LR. So far I'm fond of CCI Mini-Mag (copper plated hollow point, 36-gr, 1260 fps) as an all-around round for just about any .22 contingency (yes, only as a last resort for home defense).
The choice gets tougher as the calibers/gauges get larger. For .30 cal carbine, at just about the same price, 50 rounds of Magtech 110-gr FMC seem fine for target shooting and close enough in home defense over 20 rounds of Federal Power-Shok 110-grain soft-point RN.
For .357/.38, I think I ought to be shooting primarily .357 since that is what I would use in home defense. .38s are much cheaper but also tend to foul .357 revolvers more than exclusively shooting .357.
(Actually I'm close to deciding that the .30 caliber carbine for my needs can replace the .357/38 revolver. It does everything better, and I don't carry so I don't need the smaller print of a revolver.)
One problem is the fancy defense loads are much more expensive. I'm wondering how many of you have concluded that x plinking/target round is also good enough for home defense, and therefore shoot primarily what you also use for defense?
My Ruger Security-Six is still at Ruger getting repaired (.357 shell ejection problem and some keyholing), so I haven't shot that for the past couple weeks. I have some Corbon .357 125-grain JHP but that's too expensive to shoot regularly. I'm liking the more inexpensive Independence .357 158-grain JSP, and thinking surely it would be good enough as a home defense round too.
Shooting .38 would be cheaper, and the + plus loads a compromise although so expensive might as well stick with a magnum. So I'd like to get comfortable and proficient enough to just regard my Security-Six as a .357 Magnum and find a reasonable round for both defense and target shooting.
My double-barrel 12-gauge coach shotgun could shoot 3-inch shells, but after blasting some 2 3/4 00 magnum and No. 1 buckshot, those are plenty maximum for me. And at about 75 cents a shot, they're way too expensive to shoot more than a few times a year for minimum proficiency.
Naturally this choice is not quite the same since I don't hunt and there are few targets I'd be shooting at with 00 or No. 1. I have some Winchester reduced recoil No. 8 birdshot for informal skeet shooting, but of course that would be way too light for home defense.
However, I'm still looking for a reduced recoil and less expensive No. 1 for home defense, and if it exists, I guess that will be the best combo along with the reduced recoil No. 8 for skeet.
Overall, I've basically concluded that for home defense it's tough to beat a short-barrel (e.g., coach) shotgun and/or carbine. They're adequate close-range long guns, and super close-range short guns.
I've read lots of threads about ammo lethality and best choices, but want to doublecheck here to see if I'm missing anything. Any ideas?
Incidentally, one of the most interesting -- and informal -- ammo effect sites I've found is this one:
theboxotruth.com It has proponents and detractors, but basically is what it is, and I think it's a provocative do-it-yourself complement to more formal ammo testing.