Author Topic: the future of car engines?  (Read 2201 times)

Offline g00b

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 760
the future of car engines?
« Reply #105 on: November 09, 2006, 06:20:36 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by kamilyun
Dude, that is insane...

Was there a tailwind at all?  Not that it really matters in the grand scheme of things, b/c a non-paced human being exceeding 60 mph under his/her own power...CRAZY.

Edit:  What was the wattage he was producing during that hour?


Fast Freddy Markham was puting out about 250 watts for the hour. He covered 53.4 miles from a standing start in one hour (setting the current world record), which means he averaged about 55 mph on 1/3 of a horsepower. A quick conversion shows only about 250 food calories (I suspect more), so about 55 miles on one healthy sandwich or burrito :)  He has also gone 77mph top speed, which is currently 3rd fastest in the world.

All of these attempts have less than 3 mph wind and zero slope as required by the governing body, the IHPVA.

Offline -dead-

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1102
the future of car engines?
« Reply #106 on: November 12, 2006, 05:59:59 AM »
Steam-powered cars used to do quite well against diesels --
0-75mph in 10 secs and a maximum speed of 100mph is pretty good for 1924.
15 mpg of kerosene.
The drawback was the heat-up time: 30-40 secs.

Here's the skinny on the Doble Model E.
“The FBI has no hard evidence connecting Usama Bin Laden to 9/11.” --  Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI, June 5, 2006.