Originally posted by WhiteHawk
Saddam had abu nidal murdered, if i am not mistaken. I'll get back to you about the others. Now, you tell me about Osama Bin Laden, al queada and Weapons of Mass destruction in Iraq before the war.
yes because we all know that Al Queada is the ONLY terrorist group we need to look after.
EDIT:
and help me out here whithawk cause i'm confused....
according to your logic, they don't have to be Iraqi but if they attack Americans they are freedom fighters.
But, If they attack fellow Iraqis because they are shi'ites and blow up a market full of civilians and/or blow up lets say the golden mosque (you know because they are trying to insite....terror)......does that make them terrorists?
If so do they lose their terrorist label when they go back to fighting Americans and become freedom fighters again or does the whole terrorist thing kinda stick to them?
Can they be terrorists one day and freedom fighters the next or does it not flip flop like that?
If they are a terrorist who fights for freedom by killing there own civilians does it make them "super terror freedom fighters"?