Author Topic: Pyro, 20mm ammo load of the 109G-6/14. (Read 2547 times)

Wmaker · « **Reply #15 on:** February 06, 2008, 03:56:38 PM »

Pyro,

As the next release seems to be getting closer I thought I'd bumb this thread a bit. About the same time as I created this thread I contacted you in the MA. You hadn't seen this thread and didn't remember what exactly was behind the 200-round loadouts for later G-models. So the evidence is on this thread...and it is all primary source material. The ammo containers on G-2, G-6 and G-14 had the exact same size.

Could you please consider upping the ammo load for G-6 and G-14 as you already did for the G-2?

Pretty please.

Xasthur · « **Reply #16 on:** February 06, 2008, 05:08:56 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Wmaker
Pretty please.

Secondededed!

TUXC · « **Reply #17 on:** February 06, 2008, 05:09:47 PM »

While on the subject of gondolas, can the speed penalty for gondolas also please be looked into. It's supposed to be 7mph (12km/h) instead of the 16+mph it is now.

http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.org/me109/me109g-16476.html
http://www.wwiiaircraftperformance.org/me109/me109g-16476german.html

Bf 109g-14 and g-14/AS level speed performance with gondolas:
http://kurfurst.allaboutwarfare.com/Performance_tests/109G14_PBLeistungen/files/PBG14_LS_SNplusMW50.jpg
from:
http://kurfurst.allaboutwarfare.com/Performance_tests/109G14_PBLeistungen/Leistungen_g14u4_am-asm.html

Notice the g-14 with gondolas does 405mph at altitude (which I believe is what ours currently does without gondolas.)

Anaxogoras · « **Reply #18 on:** February 06, 2008, 09:19:48 PM »

Quote

Nice axis bias there krusty.

For the mere reason that the allies won the war and we mostly belong to the allied belligerent states, I find this accusation ridiculous...simple propaganda.

Motherland · « **Reply #19 on:** February 06, 2008, 11:17:10 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Xasthur
Secondededed!

Thirded

Bronk · « **Reply #20 on:** February 07, 2008, 04:41:48 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Anaxogoras
For the mere reason that the allies won the war and we mostly belong to the allied belligerent states, I find this accusation ridiculous...simple propaganda.

Well since this thread is well over a year old and you are hard of reading.
The comment was on the perk part.

MjTalon · « **Reply #21 on:** February 07, 2008, 07:11:33 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Motherland
Thirded

Fourth

!

Pyro · « **Reply #22 on:** February 08, 2008, 11:36:40 AM »

Alright, I added optional 200 round loaduts to the G-6 and G-14, bumped the gondolas to 140 rpg and reduced their drag a little.

Krusty · « **Reply #23 on:** February 08, 2008, 11:58:39 AM »

Really?!

That

emoticon makes me wonder if that sensation I feel is my leg being pulled

Anaxogoras · « **Reply #24 on:** February 08, 2008, 02:03:21 PM »

Yeah, obviously giving the correct ammo loadout would imbalance the arena. That's why you already see so many 109s instead of Spitfires.

Wmaker · « **Reply #25 on:** February 08, 2008, 02:05:59 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Pyro
Alright, I added optional 200 round loaduts to the G-6 and G-14, bumped the gondolas to 140 rpg and reduced their drag a little.

Great news pyro!

Thanks for listening!

hubsonfire · « **Reply #26 on:** February 08, 2008, 02:24:26 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Pyro
Alright, I added optional 200 round loaduts to the G-6 and G-14, bumped the gondolas to 140 rpg and reduced their drag a little.

Good.

angelsandair · « **Reply #27 on:** February 08, 2008, 04:50:29 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Pyro
Alright, I added optional 200 round loaduts to the G-6 and G-14, bumped the gondolas to 140 rpg and reduced their drag a little.

AWESOME!!!

Krusty · « **Reply #28 on:** February 08, 2008, 05:02:50 PM »

Quick question: Is this on the "next update" or is this something that can be done server-side? Do we wait or is it available soon?

moot · « **Reply #29 on:** February 08, 2008, 05:15:52 PM »

I'm pretty sure it's not server side.