Originally posted by Edbert
Why assign "fault" to anything? So a skwad can capture a base by defeating AI-ack and blowing up cartoon sheds...BFD!
Yeah, if the other chesspeice wanted to keep it they shold have defended...again...BFD!
I just cannot see why the taking of undefended bases is so much fun. .
this........ the first base would have probably been undefended. the 2nd was probably under-defended.... and from then on its a BLAST trying to hold on to what you have taken, or try to take more.... once people WAKE up to the full scale of an attack, they start counter attacking. thats where i had my fun on those maps....
so yes, you can assign blame to the defenders...how hard is it to up a ostie or create a 5 player mission with some fighters to stop it being a undefended base?
the main issue is, no one wants to defend, so Hitech has to defend bases for them..... that means more ack, and now forced lines of advance...hoping to get the two sides to meet... however we seem to now have A attacking B, B attacking C and C attacking A.... still very little defending going on... Soon we will have to have AI fighters.... sure thats fun...
AHI only had a few acks per base, but whenever a call for defenders went out, people would UP and FIGHT. now, everyone sits there hoping the ack will do it for them.