Originally posted by Krypto
Odd, maybe hitech gave me magical powers? My seafire turns better then any spit, just alot slower excel and a little less climb then the 8.
The AH2 Seafire Mk.II weighs 855 lb more than the Spitfire Mk.V when both are fully loaded. That's just about 11% more mass to drag around. Given the same wing area, it is not possible for the Seafire to match the Mk.V's turning radius.
Now, if the Seafire is carrying only 25% of fuel capacity, it weighs almost 500 lbs less than at full load. That will get it close to the Mk.V in a constant rate turn. Close, but not quite good enough.
I suspect you are making the universal assumption that because you were able to out-turn Spitfires with the Seafire, the Seafire is the better turner. What this really means is that you were the better pilot, able to get more from your plane than the other guy was.
If you want to test the two aircraft yourself, I can provide you with the detailed procedure we use to establish baseline turn performance for all AH2 aircraft.
Turn radius and Turn rate for all Spitfire types. 25% fuel, flaps deployed. From smallest to largest. The data is Mosq's data, but I have duplicated his results within 1%. Therefore, it is quite accurate, IMHO.
Spit1: 370.8 ft @ 21.2 degrees/sec
Spit5: 386.4 ft @ 21.0 degrees/sec
Spit9: 432.9 ft @ 20.5 degrees/sec
Seafire: 443.5 ft @ 18.5 degrees/sec
Spit8: 447.9 ft @ 20.9 degrees/sec
Spit16: 450.3 ft @ 19.9 degrees/sec
Spit14: 509.3 ft @ 19.4 degrees/sec
If you prefer a practical demonstration, meet me in the TA and we'll fly some head-to-head tests, and duel if you wish. I realize we have substantially different schedules, but we do see each other there from time to time. So, if you see me, give me a yell.
My regards,
Widewing