Author Topic: more 109 questions again  (Read 1042 times)

Offline porkfrog

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 356
more 109 questions again
« on: December 05, 2006, 07:30:59 PM »
so my 109 experiment has been going for a week roughly, and i tend to die far more than i survive. i'm upping in every condition imaginable though so it's too be expected. i have landed a few 4 and 5 kill runs though.

anyway, the planes giving me the most trouble are the spitfires and the niki. i was in a g14 last night and ran into a spit16 coalt with way more E than me and didnt stand a chance. i also had a prolonged battle against a spit16 and a niki were i got a ping or 2 into the spixteen and managed to see him auger, the niki acquired my 6 will i was fighting the spit and managed to tear me up good. oiled , missing some of my control surfaces (1 flap, 1 elevator), and one cowl gun, a lengthy scissors war ensued where i blew a few 30mm shots cause i couldn't see thru all the oil, and eventually the niki got me.

any suggestions?


(if i knew how to post a film, i have the spixteen/niki engagement on tape.)


-JoLLY
Pigs On The Wing

Offline Creton

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 550
more 109 questions again
« Reply #1 on: December 05, 2006, 09:43:14 PM »
I'll post some spit16 vs k4 films.
The spit16 holds E very well and has a good inital climb,I ussually pull up and fly a vertical modified Immel over them,it seems that as they slow down to 150-200 range they have difficulty keeping the nose up.I f you encounter a passive aggressive type flyer then you may have trouble.The spits are realatively easy to get to overshoot,especially the 16,deceleration is a problem for them.
The niki seems to turn tighter as it comes out of the bottom of the loop and less at the top of the loop.I ussually prefer to force most planes into a stall fight utilizing scissors and as most roll in the scissors ,I actually pull more vert and torque roll at the top,this allows the con to stay out front.

While the 16 has a faster roll rate,I believe that the niki does not.Learn to torque roll the plane at the top and most importantly learn to fly to the cons nose and where he is gonna be ,not where he is.A lot of times when close in fighting I am actually more to the side and slightly behind the con ,instead of always trying to get his six.This allows for more snap shot oppurtunities as he comes up and over and is flying through the cone.


I'm sure that more experienced 109 pilots will disagree with my style and ACM,but this is my opinion,FWIW.

Offline porkfrog

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 356
more 109 questions again
« Reply #2 on: December 05, 2006, 10:59:06 PM »
truthfully Creton I did not understand a lot of what you said there =) Torque roll? I'm such a nooB =(

Which plane will stall faster with full flaps, the niki or the 109? i do believe i fought the good fight considering i was so busted up and oiled, and during the lengthy scissors i did manage to get the niki in front of me several times but blew the shot cause i couldnt see, where again the missing control surfaces and my limited vis allowed the niki to again regain the firing position. i would really like for you to see the film CRETON. how do i get it to you?



-JoLLY
Pigs On The Wing

Offline Creton

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 550
more 109 questions again
« Reply #3 on: December 05, 2006, 11:56:07 PM »
I didnt mean to sound critical of your fight.I posted what I thoght you wanted.
I would be happy to look at the film and host here for others to evaluate as well.

You have a PM.

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8802
more 109 questions again
« Reply #4 on: December 06, 2006, 12:18:36 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Creton
The spits are realatively easy to get to overshoot,especially the 16,deceleration is a problem for them.


Creton, when you have some time to burn, take up a Spit16 offline. Get it up to 350 mph in a shallow dive, level off and turn on auto level. Then, pull back power to idle or simply shut the engine off. Time how long it takes to bleed down to 150 mph.

Do the same test with the 109K-4.

You will discover than the Spitfire16 bleeds of speed faster than the 109K-4, much faster (takes about 6 seconds longer for the 109K-4 to slow to 150 mph).

It seems that prop drag is modeled with prop RPM determining the max drag. The Spitfire's prop turns faster than that of the 109. The net result is greater drag. Thus, it bleeds speed faster than the 109 if the engine is windmilling at normal RPM. Weight is an obvious factor as the heavyweights tend to hold E better simply due to momentum.

Max power E bleed is another matter. The Spitfire bleeds E slower than many fighters when under heavy g, which is why they seem to hardly slow in high g turns.

Here's the speed bleed numbers and weights for some selected fighters. Those with the most rapid bleed (power cut) are the most likely to be able to force an overshoot. You might find it strange that the Tempest and Spit16 are near the bottom of the list, having miserable E retention when the prop is windmilling. The 109K-4 is mid-pack. Rather interesting data....

Starting speed is 350 mph TAS, time measured to bleed down to 150 mph when engine is shut off (or throttle chopped, same result).

P-47N: 49.91/16,300
P-47D-40: 49.84/14,500
P-47D-11: 48.34/13,582
F4U-1A: 45.91/12,050
190A-8: 45.65/9,682
F6F-5: 43.97/12,300
F4U-4: 43.65/12,400
190A-5: 42.94/8,583
Ta 152: 42.00/11,500
La-7: 39.41/7,300
Ki-61: 38.73/7,650
P-51D: 37.96/12,100
P-51B: 36.72/11,200
190D-9: 36.46/9,840
La-5FN: 36.75/7,379
109K-4: 35.72/7,440
SpitXIV: 35.69/8,500
C.205: 35.61/7,498
N1K2-J: 35.53/9,040
P-38L: 33.41/17,500
109F-4: 32.06/6,393
FM-2: 31.31/7,431
SpitVIII: 30.91/7,875
Ki-84: 30.69/7,965
Tempest: 30.28/11,400
Typhoon: 30.21/11,400
SpitXVI: 29.82/8,500
P-40E: 29.48/8,400
Yak-9U: 27.78/7,050
SpitV: 27.15/6,785
A6M5: 24.46/5,920

My regards,

Widewing
« Last Edit: December 06, 2006, 12:21:13 AM by Widewing »
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline Keeler101

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 114
more 109 questions again
« Reply #5 on: December 06, 2006, 06:35:59 AM »
So it takes the Nathen 49sec. to drop 200mph in lvl flight?

Am I reading it right :confused:

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8802
more 109 questions again
« Reply #6 on: December 06, 2006, 06:44:57 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Keeler101
So it takes the Nathen 49sec. to drop 200mph in lvl flight?

Am I reading it right :confused:


Yes, almost 50 seconds to bleed off 200 mph with the engine shut down.

My regards,

Widewing
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline bozon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6037
more 109 questions again
« Reply #7 on: December 06, 2006, 06:54:41 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Widewing
Here's the speed bleed numbers and weights for some selected fighters. Those with the most rapid bleed (power cut) are the most likely to be able to force an overshoot.  

Speed bleed in a fight is determined much more by induced drag, not by viscous drag. High loaded planes bleed more E. Other effects like un-coordinated flgiht and high speed flaps also factor in.

Look at your list. P47s and 190-A8 hold their E best in level flight deceleration. However, pull a couple of G and the speed drops almost instantly. The jug is one of the best decelerators in the game at high speed manuvering. Usually that is a disadvantage, but with some moves it can be an advantage. The stability of the jug at near stalls allows you to pull high speed G, deep into the stall without the effects of accelerated stall. It mushes into the turn flying belly forward instead of getting a real smooth turn like a spit does.
Mosquito VI - twice the spitfire, four times the ENY.

Click!>> "So, you want to fly the wooden wonder" - <<click!
the almost incomplete and not entirely inaccurate guide to the AH Mosquito.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGOWswdzGQs

Offline porkfrog

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 356
more 109 questions again
« Reply #8 on: December 06, 2006, 12:28:37 PM »
Creton, I didn't think you will being critical at all Sir. I just didnt understand some of the terms you used, like "torque roll".

checking my pm box now.

-JoLLY
Pigs On The Wing

Offline killnu

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3056
more 109 questions again
« Reply #9 on: December 06, 2006, 05:19:27 PM »
WW...understand what you posted...but who just chops throttle and flies straight and level?  most times I have a spit16 dive on my K4, its chop throttle and cross control in a vertical turn...they usually fly right on by as they chopped throttle to late...if at all.
Karma, it follows you every where you go...

++The Blue Knights++

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8802
more 109 questions again
« Reply #10 on: December 06, 2006, 05:46:20 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by killnu
WW...understand what you posted...but who just chops throttle and flies straight and level?  most times I have a spit16 dive on my K4, its chop throttle and cross control in a vertical turn...they usually fly right on by as they chopped throttle to late...if at all.


I understand. But if it were the Spitfire in front and he chopped throttle first, the 109 would be more prone to blowing by than if the roles were as you stated. The tendency for an aircraft to bleed off speed is naturally exacerbated by induced drag. Knowing the baseline gives a clue as to what to expect at the minimum.

Full power speed bleed is also valuable data if you are being pursued. For example, from a post where a player complained about not being able to chase down a P-51D with his 109K-4. Here's an example of why full power speed bleed data is useful to a pilot. Here's why the 109K-4 could not catch the Mustang.

Max speed at sea level, 25% fuel, full magazines.

P-51D: 367 mph
109K-4: 368 mph

Now, let's look at variations in load out. You are flying fully armed 109K-4 with about 50% of internal fuel remaining. You run into a P-51D with 25% fuel and only 1/3 of his ammo remaining. He elects to avoid an engagement. He dives for the deck with you chasing. You both level off at abut 50 feet doing around 450 mph.

You will never catch him until long after he runs out of WEP.

Why? Simple really, a P-51D with 25% gas and 1/3 ammo can maintain 368 mph, and with a little less gas or ammo and it'll do 369 mph. Reducing weight reduces induced drag, reducing induced drag increases speed.

Another factor: The P-51D retains speed better than the 109K-4. Again, this has been tested and verified. Due to its greater mass and lower total drag, the P-51D will bleed down from 450 mph to 368 mph considerably slower than the lighter, draggier 109K-4. What this means is that in between 450 mph and 368 mph, the Mustang will actually be pulling away from the 109 because the 109 is bleeding off speed faster.

Here's actual test data....

Fuel load 25%, zero fuel burn. Full magazines. Time to bleed speed from 450 TAS down to 368 mph TAS at 50 feet ASL. Time recorded in Minutes:Seconds.tenths of seconds.

P-51D: 3:25.85
109K-4: 2:20.10

When the 109K-4 has slowed to its max sustainable speed, the P-51D is still doing 376 mph...Pulling away. After 3 minutes, 25 seconds speeds are equalized, but the gap is considerably wider and will not even begin to close for another 65 seconds (when the P-51 runs out of WEP).

I don't know if the person who was complaining understood the exercise, but knowing how well your aircraft bleeds of E, either at pull power or at idle adds to one's understanding of what the plane is capable of. As most of us realize, the more you understand your aircraft, the more likely it is that you can utilize its full performance. Thus, I test everything! ;)

My regards,

Widewing
« Last Edit: December 06, 2006, 07:06:09 PM by Widewing »
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline porkfrog

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 356
more 109 questions again
« Reply #11 on: December 06, 2006, 05:56:30 PM »
Please explain what "Cross Controlling" means. I asked within the "38 comparisons" thread in genral but no1 responded.
-JoLLY
Pigs On The Wing

Offline Murdr

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5608
      • http://479th.jasminemaire.com
more 109 questions again
« Reply #12 on: December 06, 2006, 06:08:10 PM »
In the context I see it being used is describing a "skid".  Where one is kicking rudders one way, while countering the accompanying roll with ailerons in the opposite direction.  This leaves you yawing off angle to your direction of travel and creates a great deal of drag.

Offline killnu

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3056
more 109 questions again
« Reply #13 on: December 06, 2006, 07:03:12 PM »
what Murdr said.  thanks
Karma, it follows you every where you go...

++The Blue Knights++

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8802
more 109 questions again
« Reply #14 on: December 06, 2006, 07:04:19 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by porkfrog
I asked within the "38 comparisons" thread in genral but no1 responded.


LOL, I just responded on that thread... What Murdr said, but  in greater detail. Also answered your Lufbery question too.

My regards,

Widewing
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.