Author Topic: P-47: Most underestimated plane?  (Read 2845 times)

Offline Benny Moore

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1439
P-47: Most underestimated plane?
« Reply #60 on: December 07, 2006, 06:45:35 PM »
In the Great War, far more Londoners were killed by flak than were by Hun raiders.

Offline DrDea

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3341
P-47: Most underestimated plane?
« Reply #61 on: December 07, 2006, 06:56:16 PM »
Im surprised Hajo hasnt piped up.If you ever ran into Hajo in his Jug you know what Im saying :)
The Flying Circus.Were just like you.Only prettier.

FSO 334 Flying Eagles. Fencers Heros.

Offline bj229r

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6735
P-47: Most underestimated plane?
« Reply #62 on: December 07, 2006, 07:22:06 PM »
hmm noticed in the last pic that N has a rack to hold belly tank...is that rack not there if ya don't load tank, and does it cause drag? (A8/D9 lose as much as 10 knots due to such things)
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers

http://www.flamewarriors.net/forum/

Offline Spatula

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1486
P-47: Most underestimated plane?
« Reply #63 on: December 07, 2006, 07:35:56 PM »
I thought 2.09 introduced drag on the hard-points which are fitted if you carried ord?
Airborne Kitchen Utensil Assault Group

Offline Stang

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6127
P-47: Most underestimated plane?
« Reply #64 on: December 07, 2006, 07:39:06 PM »
Worst plane in the game besides the P-38.

:furious

Offline bj229r

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6735
P-47: Most underestimated plane?
« Reply #65 on: December 07, 2006, 08:31:36 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Spatula
I thought 2.09 introduced drag on the hard-points which are fitted if you carried ord?

It was my understanding that most US planes had aerodynamic hard points already in place whether ord was loaded or not, and they didnt cause drag, but that looked like a run-of-the-mill rack there....dunno
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers

http://www.flamewarriors.net/forum/

Offline Platano

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1325
P-47: Most underestimated plane?
« Reply #66 on: December 07, 2006, 10:35:37 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Stang
Worst plane in the game besides the P-38.

:furious




:rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :mad:
Army of Muppets


Fly Luftwaffe.

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8801
P-47: Most underestimated plane?
« Reply #67 on: December 07, 2006, 11:38:55 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by bj229r
It was my understanding that most US planes had aerodynamic hard points already in place whether ord was loaded or not, and they didnt cause drag, but that looked like a run-of-the-mill rack there....dunno


There's no drag penalty for the P-47s (or P-38s, or P-51s) for taking ordnance or drop tanks. Pylons were installed at the factory on these types and their speed reflects this in the game.

For example, a P-47D-40 with 25% gas, take off with wing and belly tanks... Dropped right after takeoff.

V2.08: 436 mph at 30k
V2.09: 436 mph at 30k

My regards,

Widewing
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.

Offline YUCCA

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 985
P-47: Most underestimated plane?
« Reply #68 on: December 11, 2006, 04:20:01 PM »
Lol sonic.  I killed you a few more than one time.  And as far as turning goes the only thing you did was climb then bnz lol.  Silly spit16 pilots impress themselves by outclimbing a 20,000lb+  to bnz.  If you'd like to say otherwise i still have the films somewhere sugar shorts.

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
P-47: Most underestimated plane?
« Reply #69 on: December 11, 2006, 04:25:40 PM »
shell casings and flak splinters wouldn't be lethal when falling. They are light weight and high area, and reach terminal velocity quickly. Even bullets probably wouldn't have killed after they lost all their velocity (Mythbusters took this on by shooting rounds into the air)

Offline Wolfala

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4875
P-47: Most underestimated plane?
« Reply #70 on: December 11, 2006, 05:29:25 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Krusty
shell casings and flak splinters wouldn't be lethal when falling. They are light weight and high area, and reach terminal velocity quickly. Even bullets probably wouldn't have killed after they lost all their velocity (Mythbusters took this on by shooting rounds into the air)



Mmm...ok, you stand underneath a 50cal while its firing straight up with zero wind - i'll stay in a hardened shelter.


the best cure for "wife ack" is to deploy chaff:    $...$$....$....$$$.....$ .....$$$.....$ ....$$

Offline bj229r

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6735
P-47: Most underestimated plane?
« Reply #71 on: December 11, 2006, 05:31:18 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Widewing
There's no drag penalty for the P-47s (or P-38s, or P-51s) for taking ordnance or drop tanks. Pylons were installed at the factory on these types and their speed reflects this in the game.

For example, a P-47D-40 with 25% gas, take off with wing and belly tanks... Dropped right after takeoff.

V2.08: 436 mph at 30k
V2.09: 436 mph at 30k

My regards,

Widewing


Thanks Widewing, if they ever had a "Jeopardy" based on airplane stuff, they'd never get you off there:)
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers

http://www.flamewarriors.net/forum/

Offline jon

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 419
      • http://http://www.wildaces.us
P-47: Most underestimated plane?
« Reply #72 on: December 11, 2006, 05:33:38 PM »
how are you playing this game for 9 months and have 416 post and i have never seen one? before this thread.
« Last Edit: December 11, 2006, 05:37:21 PM by jon »

Offline Stoney74

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1439
P-47: Most underestimated plane?
« Reply #73 on: December 11, 2006, 06:42:28 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Krusty
shell casings and flak splinters wouldn't be lethal when falling. They are light weight and high area, and reach terminal velocity quickly. Even bullets probably wouldn't have killed after they lost all their velocity (Mythbusters took this on by shooting rounds into the air)



Had a AH-1 Cobra empty a 14 shot rocket pod above me about 50 feet off the deck one time.  It was disconcerting to say the least.  Also had a buddy who was in a Humvee when a Cobra was shooting the 20mm.  Shell casings came raining down all over the rig, bouncing off the hood and such.  He said that was also disconcerting...

Offline Platano

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1325
P-47: Most underestimated plane?
« Reply #74 on: December 12, 2006, 02:32:05 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by jon
how are you playing this game for 9 months and have 416 post and i have never seen one? before this thread.





Cuz i dont reply that much, I just Read.... And most of my post used to be in the AvA thread since thats where I used to fly most of the time b4 going to MA...
Army of Muppets


Fly Luftwaffe.