« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

Author Topic: Lancaster perk option  (Read 951 times)

Offline BaldEagl

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10791
Lancaster perk option
« on: December 11, 2006, 12:50:11 PM »
I want to see the Lancaster B1 Specials which could carry the 21 foot long 12,000 lb "Tallboy" or 25.5 foot long 22,000 lb "Grand Slam" "earthquake" bombs. This required modification of the bomb-bay doors which would make this a perfect 2nd Lancaster perk option.  With appropriate blast radius of course.  These were used primarily to take out hardened targets (such as HQ in AHII) late in the war.
Logged
I edit a lot of my posts.  Get used to it.

Offline Tilt

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
      • FullTilt
Lancaster perk option
« Reply #1 on: December 11, 2006, 01:30:32 PM »
Also of course in order to make proper use of the "earth quake" effect the lanc had to drop said Tallboy or Grand Slam from in excess of 18,000 feet above target...................
Logged
Ludere Vincere

Offline BaldEagl

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10791
Lancaster perk option
« Reply #2 on: December 11, 2006, 01:58:53 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Tilt
Also of course in order to make proper use of the "earth quake" effect the lanc had to drop said Tallboy or Grand Slam from in excess of 18,000 feet above target...................


Which is just fine as thats where I always fly my Lancs.  Of course getting there with the extra payload may take a little longer.
Logged
I edit a lot of my posts.  Get used to it.

Offline GlassJaw

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 157
Lancaster perk option
« Reply #3 on: December 11, 2006, 03:24:59 PM »
I think this is a great idea... we need more things to do with bomber perks.
Logged

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Lancaster perk option
« Reply #4 on: December 11, 2006, 03:49:49 PM »
I'd like a larger bomb here and there, for strat and such (if it wouldn't do any damage to a field, or some sort of compromise), but HTC has said they won't model any bomb larger than the 4k "cookie" already in-game. I guess we'll just have to wait for the B29 where we get the same bombs -- just a HELL of a lot more of them! (20,000lbs of ord, I'm thinking 20x 1000lb bombs?)
Logged

Offline Tilt

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
      • FullTilt
Lancaster perk option
« Reply #5 on: December 12, 2006, 09:31:36 AM »
Lanc could carry two 4000 lb cookies plus a few (I think 4) 500's in between.
Logged
Ludere Vincere

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Lancaster perk option
« Reply #6 on: December 12, 2006, 12:24:53 PM »
It *could*.. but did it, regularly? The bomb loads we have in AH are the representative, "common", loads found on regular bombers.
Logged

Offline mussie

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2147
Lancaster perk option
« Reply #7 on: December 12, 2006, 08:41:45 PM »
Yeah but having perkable loads would make flying buffs more fun...

ATM a pony carries more than 30% of  b17.....

Just my opinion mind you
Logged

Offline Spiritin

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 359
There is no point
« Reply #8 on: December 13, 2006, 06:45:35 AM »
Surely there is little or no point in having such a massive bomb without a suitable target e.g. a bunker or sub pen?
Logged
"I'm just going for a spin in the old Lagonda with a brace of popsies"

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Lancaster perk option
« Reply #9 on: December 13, 2006, 11:10:47 AM »
Model the Tirpitz, with far too much ack to ever come in below 20k, and torpedo fences to prevent low-alt suicide torp runs. THAT would be pretty damn cool :)

Or hydro dams.

What other targets were they used on?
Logged

Offline Kev367th

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5290
Lancaster perk option
« Reply #10 on: December 13, 2006, 12:23:39 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Krusty
Model the Tirpitz, with far too much ack to ever come in below 20k, and torpedo fences to prevent low-alt suicide torp runs. THAT would be pretty damn cool :)

Or hydro dams.

What other targets were they used on?


Submarine pens, viaducts (Beilefeld springs to mind) and tunnels.

Beilefeld was a nice hit -
After 1000's and 1000's of lbs of normal bombs it took one Grandslam to topple it.

[edit] Good list of 617sqn ops and targets here -

http://www.dambusters.org.uk/operations.htm
« Last Edit: December 13, 2006, 12:29:54 PM by Kev367th »
Logged
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T
Asus M3N-HT mobo
2 x 2Gb Corsair 1066 DDR2 memory

Offline BaldEagl

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10791
Lancaster perk option
« Reply #11 on: December 13, 2006, 12:27:07 PM »
The hardened building at HQ would be the prime target.  I think you'd see more single pilot runs at it which, in turn, would make 163's viable more often.
Logged
I edit a lot of my posts.  Get used to it.

Offline skycaptn

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 126
Lancaster perk option
« Reply #12 on: December 14, 2006, 06:33:32 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Krusty
It *could*.. but did it, regularly? The bomb loads we have in AH are the representative, "common", loads found on regular bombers.


WOW!

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHH!!!!!!!!
(SNORT!)
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHHHAHAHAHAH AHH!!!

WTF war did you study boy?

Re-read the loadouts for the buffs we have in this game.. you will find that most of them carry between 1 to 5k more then they did consistently in reality.

CATCH UP KRUSTY YOUR GETTING SLOPPY!
Logged

Offline Tilt

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7358
      • FullTilt
Lancaster perk option
« Reply #13 on: December 14, 2006, 07:53:20 AM »
Yes Krusty it was a fairly regular load out.

Note the 2 x 4000lb cookies were infact bolted together to form an 8000lb cookie.

http://www.lancaster-archive.com/Lanc-bombs-Loads.htm
Logged
Ludere Vincere

Offline Stoney74

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1439
Lancaster perk option
« Reply #14 on: December 14, 2006, 07:38:50 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by mussie
Yeah but having perkable loads would make flying buffs more fun...

ATM a pony carries more than 30% of  b17.....

Just my opinion mind you



Ponies rarely, if ever, carried 2X1000lbs. in combat even thought they could.  A 6,000lb bomb load was the norm for the B-17 going deep into Germany.  If they were only going to France from England, they could have carried more...
Logged
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
« previous next »