« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Down

Author Topic: Target..+Iran+  (Read 841 times)

Offline WhiteHawk

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1815
Target..+Iran+
« on: December 24, 2006, 07:08:57 AM »
Well, it looks as if Iran is just begging the US to invade.  As they are stepping up thier efforts to aquire nukes, the US will be left with no alternative but to go into Iran.  Its almost a blessing in disquise that we are forced to increase our troop level in Iraq to squelch out those pesky inusrgents as this will serve as the perfect base of operations to finally squash those terrorist loving iranians.  Wow, wwIII is comming.  Hide your children.  :confused:
Logged

Offline cpxxx

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2707
Re: Target..+Iran+
« Reply #1 on: December 24, 2006, 07:20:43 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by WhiteHawk
.  Wow, wwIII is comming.  Hide your children.  :confused:


Not from nukes, but from the draft board. Because if the USA invades Iran. It will be a long war.  Iraq is heading for it's fifth year and it's hardly a proper war.
Logged

Offline bsdaddict

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1108
Re: Target..+Iran+
« Reply #2 on: December 24, 2006, 07:44:21 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by WhiteHawk
Its almost a blessing in disquise that we are forced to increase our troop level...

tell that to the guys on the ground, and the one's who get drafted.  Methinks they won't feel so "blessed"
Logged

Offline ByeBye

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 599
Target..+Iran+
« Reply #3 on: December 24, 2006, 07:48:37 AM »
Logged

Offline Eagler

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18799
Target..+Iran+
« Reply #4 on: December 24, 2006, 09:15:00 AM »
you left out the part where you blame the US for the cheekboness actions in Iran whitehawk...
Logged
"Masters of the Air" Scenario - JG27


Intel Core i7-13700KF | GIGABYTE Z790 AORUS Elite AX | 64GB G.Skill DDR5 | 16GB GIGABYTE RTX 4070 Ti Super | 850 watt ps | pimax Crystal Light | Warthog stick | TM1600 throttle | VKB Mk.V Rudder

Offline Dago

  • Parolee
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5324
Target..+Iran+
« Reply #5 on: December 24, 2006, 09:28:32 AM »
Actually, since the insurgency in Iraq is primarily funded and supplied by Iran, if we smashed Iran, the Iraq conflict might subside rather quickly.  I think a few small tactical nukes delivered onto Iran would be a good start.  Time to play hardball, let the bleeding hearts wimper.
Logged
"Life should NOT be a journey to the grave with the intention of arriving safely in an attractive and well preserved body, but rather to skid in sideways, chocolate in one hand, martini in the other, body thoroughly used up, totally worn out and screaming "WOO HOO what a ride!"

Offline lukster

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2581
Target..+Iran+
« Reply #6 on: December 24, 2006, 10:04:23 AM »
Islamofacists are already in charge in Iran and they are blodly proclaiming doom for Israel and the US. What do we have to lose by going and destroying their military and government? We don't need to leave an occupying force or do any rebuilding like we have in Afghanistan and Iraq. When they rebuild and start making noise we just do it again, and again.
Logged

Offline Nashwan

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1864
Target..+Iran+
« Reply #7 on: December 24, 2006, 10:15:17 AM »
Quote
What do we have to lose by going and destroying their military and government?


Jobs and lives.

Probably a few hundred lives if things go well, in the thousands if they go badly. Millions of jobs either way.

An attack on Iran, and the Iranian retaliation, means the oil price will go well over $100 a barrel, maybe as much as $200. That means $6 a gallon or more when you fill up.

What do you have to gain by destroying the Iranian military and government?
Logged

Offline lukster

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2581
Target..+Iran+
« Reply #8 on: December 24, 2006, 10:20:40 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Nashwan
Jobs and lives.

Probably a few hundred lives if things go well, in the thousands if they go badly. Millions of jobs either way.

An attack on Iran, and the Iranian retaliation, means the oil price will go well over $100 a barrel, maybe as much as $200. That means $6 a gallon or more when you fill up.

What do you have to gain by destroying the Iranian military and government?


You assume a ground war. We decimated Iraqs army long before ground troops invaded and lost far fewer than a "few hundred" lives. I think it pure specualtion on the impact on the price of oil.

What do we have to gain? How about eliminating the threat of a nuclear attack on Israel which could very possibly escalate into something very, very ugly.
Logged

Offline Thrawn

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6972
Target..+Iran+
« Reply #9 on: December 24, 2006, 10:29:29 AM »
Amazing, the US invading Iran would give OBL multiple orgasms.
Logged

Offline lukster

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2581
Target..+Iran+
« Reply #10 on: December 24, 2006, 10:35:56 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Thrawn
Amazing, the US invading Iran would give OBL multiple orgasms.


Just a quick 3-4 week bombing campaign should be sufficient to shut Amadmanjihad's big mouth. If not, a second visit would almost certainly do the trick.
Logged

Offline takeda

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 514
Target..+Iran+
« Reply #11 on: December 24, 2006, 10:43:48 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Dago
Actually, since the insurgency in Iraq is primarily funded and supplied by Iran.


lol
Logged

Offline Thrawn

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6972
Target..+Iran+
« Reply #12 on: December 24, 2006, 10:46:50 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by lukster
Just a quick 3-4 week bombing campaign should be sufficient to shut Amadmanjihad's big mouth. If not, a second visit would almost certainly do the trick.



Yeah, and the Bush administration that the occupation of Iraq would be a piece of cake.  You and everyone else here advocating an attack on Iran are only seeing the best possible (and not necessarily most probable outcome).  What was the response of the US public when it was attacked?  Now, how can you possibly think an entire nation of Shia are going to rollover?  Hell even the Pentagon thinks that bombing Iran is (to put it kindly) short-sighted.

http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/060710fa_fact
Logged

Offline Ripsnort

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 27260
Target..+Iran+
« Reply #13 on: December 24, 2006, 10:50:58 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by takeda
lol

welcome to 2 weeks ago.:rolleyes:
http://abcnews.go.com/International/IraqCoverage/story?id=2688501
Logged

Offline lukster

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2581
Target..+Iran+
« Reply #14 on: December 24, 2006, 10:51:34 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Thrawn
Yeah, and the Bush administration that the occupation of Iraq would be a piece of cake.  You and everyone else here advocating an attack on Iran are only seeing the best possible (and not necessarily most probable outcome).  What was the response of the US public when it was attacked?  Now, how can you possibly think an entire nation of Shia are going to rollover?  Hell even the Pentagon thinks that bombing Iran is (to put it kindly) short-sighted.

http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/060710fa_fact


Please quote for me one instance where Bush said or otherwise implied the occupation of Iraq would be a piece of cake. So long as you make irresponsible and untrue claims like this there is little point in discussing this with you.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Up
« previous next »