Author Topic: how many more soldiers do we need  (Read 753 times)

Offline MrCoffee

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 934
how many more soldiers do we need
« on: January 14, 2007, 01:32:57 AM »
To find the WMD?

Offline joowenn

  • Parolee
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 115
how many more soldiers do we need
« Reply #1 on: January 14, 2007, 01:39:10 AM »
Hey what country are you from anyways! IRAQ?!

Offline JB88

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10980
how many more soldiers do we need
« Reply #2 on: January 14, 2007, 02:09:14 AM »
oh look.  it's nuke.

hi nuke.
this thread is doomed.
www.augustbach.com  

To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield. -Ulysses.

word.

Offline rabbidrabbit

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3910
Re: how many more soldiers do we need
« Reply #3 on: January 14, 2007, 02:11:55 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by MrCoffee
To find the WMD?


Stay away from the cheap stuff.  You will regret it less each morning.

Offline AquaShrimp

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1706
how many more soldiers do we need
« Reply #4 on: January 14, 2007, 02:23:08 AM »
This administration will go down in history for making more military blunders than any other.

If there were WMDs, the Bush administration let them escape to Syria or Iran.

If there weren't WMDs, then the entire war was a mistake.

Read a book buddy, the average insurgency lasts from 7 to 12 years.  We are in this for the long haul.

Offline Catalyst

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 113
how many more soldiers do we need
« Reply #5 on: January 14, 2007, 08:29:06 AM »
See Rule #5
« Last Edit: January 15, 2007, 01:06:19 PM by Skuzzy »

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16333
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
how many more soldiers do we need
« Reply #6 on: January 14, 2007, 10:15:02 AM »
88, thats not Nuke.
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline Hap

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3908
how many more soldiers do we need
« Reply #7 on: January 14, 2007, 10:18:36 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Catalyst
sure send more troops, more fudder for them Radicals...

bring on the fudder.

while fudder is feed to them radicals.

I'm sure more fudder is needed, yup yup, thats the ticket.


Fodder not fudder


Regards,

hap

Offline MrCoffee

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 934
how many more soldiers do we need
« Reply #8 on: January 14, 2007, 02:36:57 PM »
No, I actually believe they were WMD in Iraq. However after the fact, its hard not to bring up the subject every now and then.  Jeeze what an intell mistake.

Offline VooWho

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1214
how many more soldiers do we need
« Reply #9 on: January 14, 2007, 05:58:37 PM »
Well for one thing if there were WMD in Iraq, they could be hiden in the sand. After the invasion some soldies found a half barried Mig-29, and then they found more barried Mig-29 fighters and other top design fighters that Saddam had bought. Maybe Saddam did make WMD but hid them under the sand, so when WMD people came to check, they check no WMD found. Another thing. Iraq did once make a nuclear facility, but the Isrealies bomb the hell out of it. Iraq had the power to make WMD. I believe these WMD are not nukes, but there chemical warheads that well cause alot of deaths, if they struck say Isreal, Kuwait, Iran, or Saudi Arabia. Saddam did us chemical weapons in the war of Iran and Iraq, and he did us them against his own people. But Saddam could have taking one of his (forget the name of the rockets) big rockets and place chemicals and send it flying to Isreal. He did launch these rockets with massive explosions in them to Isreal in the first Gulf War. Remember that U.S. camp he hit killing hundreds of soldiers. He had the tecnology and he could have done it some time in the near future. Saddam wasn't scared of the U.S. If he was he would have giving up his power when Bush said, give up in 72 hours. He did get scared after we did invade him though :) WMD or not if we didn't go to Iraq, the top 2006 story could be, 10,000 Isrealies dead after Iraq sold chemical WMD to Hesbola (How do you spell that) and Iraq launces 5 CWMD towards Kuwait.
« Last Edit: January 14, 2007, 06:00:47 PM by VooWho »
Non Sibi Sed Patriae!

Offline Hornet33

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2487
how many more soldiers do we need
« Reply #10 on: January 14, 2007, 07:10:12 PM »
Ask the Kurds and the Iranians if Iraq had WMD's. Chemical weapons are considered a weapon of mass destruction and Saddam NEVER lost his ability to manufacture those types of weapons, and he used them.

The WMD question has been asked and answered. Yes he had them, Yes he used them, and YES he was a threat to this country.

NO the war is NOT a mistake.

Have a nice day.
AHII Con 2006, HiTech, "This game is all about pissing off the other guy!!"

Offline Sandman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17620
how many more soldiers do we need
« Reply #11 on: January 14, 2007, 07:11:47 PM »
How was the koolaid?
sand

Offline dmf

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2920
how many more soldiers do we need
« Reply #12 on: January 14, 2007, 07:49:08 PM »
OK I've said this at work and I've told the idiot armchair generals in my apt complex this so I'l say it here too.

They had WMD's and 6 months got move them out of there before the first troops went in back in '91. What makes the administration think they would leave them there to be found this time?

I think they had them moved away to another country before this current war started.

Offline DiabloTX

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9592
how many more soldiers do we need
« Reply #13 on: January 14, 2007, 08:18:11 PM »
The koolaid does indeed pour both ways.
"There ain't no revolution, only evolution, but every time I'm in Denmark I eat a danish for peace." - Diablo

Offline AquaShrimp

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1706
how many more soldiers do we need
« Reply #14 on: January 14, 2007, 08:22:34 PM »
If money could buy WMDs, then terrorists and rogue nations would have them.  

North Korea may have nuclear weapons comparable in size to what the U.S. had in the late 40s.  Look at how long it has taken them to get that.

Gas weapons such as chlorine and mustard gas are not very dangerous.  I wouldn't consider them WMDs.  So finding a few unexploded mustard gas shells is by no means validation.