Author Topic: FYI This is not a "HO":)  (Read 4464 times)

Offline stockli

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 157
for the record
« Reply #105 on: January 16, 2007, 11:33:39 AM »
I only complain about ho'ing when it happens when they have an obvious advantage in numbers.

5 nikis on my p51 and one comes nose to nose and rips your prop with cannon.

It ticks me off.

Would it happen in real life, maybe.  It still pisses me off though.

Offline dtango

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1702
FYI This is not a "HO":)
« Reply #106 on: January 16, 2007, 12:05:45 PM »
Some rambling thoughts:

(1) Defining HO's reminds me very much of the definition of ACM.  In the USAF ACM has a strict definition and that is used for maneuvers in a 2v1 where aircraft are working in concert.  Yet people here use ACM to mean 1v1 maneuvering.  So in the same way folks will call Forward Quarter shots HO's.

(2) A face shot is a face shot no matter if you're 0 lead angle off the nose going "beak to beak" or if the shooter has 60 degree lead angle off of the bandit's nose.  The target is being shot in the forward quarter.

(3) There's no shame in taking a HO or forward quarter shot.  A shot is a shot.  The object is to shoot the other guy down.  Take what you can get.

(4) Getting a forward quarter shot or HO is independent of your skill in air combat.  You might have used all the tactics and maneuvers in the world to get that shot.  You might not have.

(5) If I happen to be the one being hit in the front quarter, my plane is the flight path of my advesary's bullets.  Whether I like it or not I've maneuverd my plane into a position to get hit in the front quarter either unintentionally or by choice.    If I don't like that then I should figure out ways I can stay out of them next time :)!

Tango, XO
412th FS Braunco Mustangs
Tango / Tango412 412th FS Braunco Mustangs
"At times it seems like people think they can chuck bunch of anecdotes into some converter which comes up with the flight model." (Wmaker)

Offline Suave

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2950
FYI This is not a "HO":)
« Reply #107 on: January 16, 2007, 12:09:32 PM »
Please share with us that strict definition and tell us how it differs from the USN definition. Seems some here don't believe me.

Offline Yeager

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10167
FYI This is not a "HO":)
« Reply #108 on: January 16, 2007, 12:13:44 PM »
game has guns, rockets and bombs and you use those to kill other dweebs just like yourself.  You guys trying to impose some set of rules might as well just go suck on an exhaust pipe.  Play the game as best you can and stop your whimperish toddler like whining.
"If someone flips you the bird and you don't know it, does it still count?" - SLIMpkns

Offline Suave

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2950
FYI This is not a "HO":)
« Reply #109 on: January 16, 2007, 12:21:15 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Yeager
game has guns, rockets and bombs and you use those to kill other dweebs just like yourself.  You guys trying to impose some set of rules might as well just go suck on an exhaust pipe.  Play the game as best you can and stop your whimperish toddler like whining.


LOL:rofl

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
FYI This is not a "HO":)
« Reply #110 on: January 16, 2007, 12:21:46 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Tumor
Look at it like this... at some point in that turning whateveryoucallit... it becomes less HOish.  But, in the end, it's still just so much HO style firing.  Here's another angle... would those shots have registered in AW?  No, most wouldn't.  Why?  Because HO's were/are/will be a pain in the oscar that most would rather do without.  I'm not saying in any way these are shots that should not be taken... I would.  But this is just a part of the reason I no longer engage in the tight turning stall fight.  9 times out of 10 you end up in a joust, if and ONLY if someone else doesn't jump in cherry one of ya.



Yes, those shots would have counted in AW as I took deflection snaps shots like that all the time.  So to summarize, front quarter deflection shots are not HOs and yes, they did register in AW.


ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
FYI This is not a "HO":)
« Reply #111 on: January 16, 2007, 12:24:26 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by herrhav0k
when one plane does not fire on the first merge in an attempt to set up a decent fight, and the other plane does.




Hate to burst any bubbles, but the majority of the time when the other guy doesn't shoot at the merge isn't because he's trying to set up a good fight.  It's because he doesn't have a gun solution.


ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
FYI This is not a "HO":)
« Reply #112 on: January 16, 2007, 12:24:47 PM »
The term "Head On" give the impression that if no action is taken.

The 2 objects will collide .

The farther you get away from 0 degrees the less chance of that happening.

So I say a face shot is much different than a HO .

If I can shoot you in the face but you cant do the same it's not a HO.




Bronk
See Rule #4

Offline SkyRock

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7758
FYI This is not a "HO":)
« Reply #113 on: January 16, 2007, 12:27:20 PM »
AKAK.......defender of all things HO!  :aok

Triton28 - "...his stats suggest he has a healthy combination of suck and sissy!"

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
FYI This is not a "HO":)
« Reply #114 on: January 16, 2007, 12:35:52 PM »
Where am I defending the HO?  Or are you just to stupid to comprehend what is being said?  


ack-ack
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
FYI This is not a "HO":)
« Reply #115 on: January 16, 2007, 12:37:01 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Ack-Ack
Where am I defending the HO?  Or are you just to stupid to comprehend what is being said?  


ack-ack


That would be the later.:D

Bronk
See Rule #4

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20386
FYI This is not a "HO":)
« Reply #116 on: January 16, 2007, 12:40:09 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Ack-Ack
Hate to burst any bubbles, but the majority of the time when the other guy doesn't shoot at the merge isn't because he's trying to set up a good fight.  It's because he doesn't have a gun solution.


ack-ack


Hmmm, not sure I'd agree with that one.  I'm sure it's true in some cases but more and more lately I'm seeing guys not shooting at the merge and working it for the fight instead.

It's actually been better that way as of late.
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
FYI This is not a "HO":)
« Reply #117 on: January 16, 2007, 12:45:14 PM »
http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/head%20on

head-on     /ˈhɛdˈɒn, -ˈɔn/ Pronunciation Key - Show Spelled Pronunciation[hed-on, -awn] Pronunciation Key - Show IPA Pronunciation
–adjective
1.   (of two objects) meeting with the fronts or heads foremost: a head-on collision.
2.   facing the direction of forward motion or alignment; frontal.
3.   characterized by direct opposition: a head-on confrontation.
–adverb
4.   with the front or head foremost, esp. in a collision: She stepped out of the front door and walked head-on into her husband.

Hmm no mention of angles.

:rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Wonder why.

Bronk
See Rule #4

Offline herrhav0k

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 36
FYI This is not a "HO":)
« Reply #118 on: January 16, 2007, 01:21:13 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Ack-Ack
Hate to burst any bubbles, but the majority of the time when the other guy doesn't shoot at the merge isn't because he's trying to set up a good fight.  It's because he doesn't have a gun solution.


ack-ack


I disagree because I know I'm not the only one who holds off shooting on the first merge in a 1 on 1 fight. In the typical near nose-to-nose merges we are talking about, I don't see how both parties couldn't have a gun solution on the first pass if they both wanted to.

Offline Yeager

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10167
FYI This is not a "HO":)
« Reply #119 on: January 16, 2007, 01:26:14 PM »
I always try to take a shot any time the trajectory from my gun barrels have a decent chance of intersecting the target.  Thats why I pay my money.
"If someone flips you the bird and you don't know it, does it still count?" - SLIMpkns