Author Topic: Let the games begin! Hillary 1, Obama 0 (Read 5429 times)

x0847Marine · « **Reply #60 on:** January 21, 2007, 04:55:52 PM »

Vote libertarian. Stop rewarding the repub / Dems for failure.

Hillery & Obummer are party hacks, not leaders... nothing will change if either of these clones are elected, they'll drive their tired jalopy of party ideals down the same dusty road as the party hacks before them... has either one of them ever had an original thought?... no, they vomit party talking points like good robots because they lack the skills to think for themselves.

These people didn't get where they are by being competent, smart or qualified, they are good party fund raisers, media manipulators and above all... they owe lots people lots of favors in return for all that donated $$

My prediction for 08: the idiot party hack will win.

CHECKERS · « **Reply #61 on:** January 21, 2007, 05:17:11 PM »

Their are both POS !

john9001 · « **Reply #62 on:** January 21, 2007, 05:19:28 PM »

<
My prediction for 08: the idiot party hack will win.>>

word.

midnight Target · « **Reply #63 on:** January 21, 2007, 05:46:37 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Mini D
The real point is that the website you linked is just as biased/erronious/skewed as the one they are claiming to be a right-wing mouthpiece.

Do YOU think that Hillary would have a background check done on Obama?

Of course she could. But once again, this entire thread is based upon the assumption that she in fact DID. There is at least evidence to suggest that it is all a right wing hit job based on the transcript of the Fox show.

Point is, no one knows.
Period.

john9001 · « **Reply #64 on:** January 21, 2007, 05:57:43 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by midnight Target
Point is, no one knows.
Period.

hillery knows.

Yeager · « **Reply #65 on:** January 21, 2007, 05:59:32 PM »

Is Obama a muslim?

Mini D · « **Reply #66 on:** January 21, 2007, 06:10:23 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by midnight Target
Of course she could. But once again, this entire thread is based upon the assumption that she in fact DID. There is at least evidence to suggest that it is all a right wing hit job based on the transcript of the Fox show.

Point is, no one knows.
Period.

LOL! Wow you're moving into uber-tard territory. The point is that the "evidence" cited was a non-related radio talk show that said nothing about background checks but jumped to incorrect conclusions about his past. Do you think anyone has question Obama's past at all given that his father was, in fact, muslim?

I think it is in Hillary's best interest for that to be brought up by the "right wing conspiracy" as much as possible.

midnight Target · « **Reply #67 on:** January 21, 2007, 06:58:05 PM »

Compared to the "evidence" cited in the original article... one is ubertard and one is ... well

silly.

my point stands

VermGhost · « **Reply #68 on:** January 21, 2007, 07:26:07 PM »

A woman or a black man will never win the presidential race. This country is not ready for that kind of step.

In addition, Obama and Clinton both have a lawyer's background, and are democrats, two regular characteristics of typical politicians in most cases.

As far as stances on issues I think the american people deserve candidates who have drawn a line to show where they stand, not some waffling, non-commited bull*****e such as

Quote

X k) Other or expanded principles
I support common-sense gun safety measures to make our streets and communities safer. Specifically, I strongly support renewing the ban on semi-automatic assault weapons, and I have introduced legislation to require that child safety locks be sold with every handgun and to ban junk guns.

This is from non-other than Senator Feinstein of California. And no I did not vote for her.

Sounds like the Mayor of Seattle to me.

E25280 · « **Reply #69 on:** January 21, 2007, 08:37:51 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by VermGhost
A woman or a black man will never win the presidential race. This country is not ready for that kind of step. . .

Speak for yourself.

I would vote for a green and yellow polkadotted hermaphadite space alien if the policies / platform was one I could agree with, and I had a reasonable expectation said alien would follow through on that platform.

But then, by definition, a space alien would not be a natrual-born US citizen, so I guess my dream will never be . . .

Mini D · « **Reply #70 on:** January 21, 2007, 08:55:28 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by midnight Target
Compared to the "evidence" cited in the original article... one is ubertard and one is ... well

silly.

my point stands

No point made. No evidence was cited in anything. It was all rumours.

Now... you do a little thinking about who would benifit from them and who would look silly if they started them. Why would the reps use that publication for planting a false story? Why would Hillary use that publication for planting a false story? Look at the two answers and see which one makes more sense.

midnight Target · « **Reply #71 on:** January 21, 2007, 09:27:43 PM »

Oh for crying out loud. Now you're just arguing for the sake of arguing. No evidence was cited is exactly the point I made.

So you think Hillary benefits more from this smear than the republicans would benefit from claiming Hillary is smearing Obama? LOL.. my god man, that is like throwing a hand full of rocks at the ocean and gloating that you hit it.

No evidence.. period.

Mini D · « **Reply #72 on:** January 22, 2007, 12:01:47 AM »

You cited a site that blamed someone else.

lukster · « **Reply #73 on:** January 22, 2007, 12:13:15 AM »

If Hillary is elected I'm moving to Idaho and stockpiling ammunition.

I plan to move there if she doesn't win too.

StarOfAfrica2 · « **Reply #74 on:** January 22, 2007, 12:31:29 AM »

Build a spud-gun. Ammo is all around you in Idaho.