« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Down

Author Topic: Why no B-25?????  (Read 1341 times)

Offline Tango

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1421
      • http://www.simpilots.org/
Why no B-25?????
« on: February 06, 2007, 08:20:16 PM »
Just wondering.
Logged
Tango78
78th Razorbacks
Historical Air Combat Group

Offline Ack-Ack

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 25260
      • FlameWarriors
Why no B-25?????
« Reply #1 on: February 06, 2007, 08:21:33 PM »
Because HiTech doesn't like you.



ack-ack
Logged
"If Jesus came back as an airplane, he would be a P-38." - WW2 P-38 pilot
Elite Top Aces +1 Mexican Official Squadron Song

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Why no B-25?????
« Reply #2 on: February 06, 2007, 10:13:09 PM »
DANGIT!!! Hitech said that if we could go for 10 days without anybody asking, we'd get it next update, but if we couldn't keep quiet we'd never get it! This was DAY 9!!!


Thanks a LOT, man!! :furious :furious :furious
Logged

Offline rabbidrabbit

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3910
Why no B-25?????
« Reply #3 on: February 06, 2007, 10:32:59 PM »
its 14 days not 10.. get it straight!
Logged

Offline Mark Luper

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1626
Why no B-25?????
« Reply #4 on: February 06, 2007, 10:33:20 PM »
I beleive when the game was in it's infancy it was decided to come up with a "different" two engined bomber than the B-25. Seems like at the time everyone had a B-25, noone had the B-26. In fact, I remember thinking the B-26 would be the one to have vrs the B-25. Pyro agreed with that so we got the B-26. I'm not saying that I had anything to do with it, Pyro and I just happened to think the same thing at the same time.

I would like to see the B-25 but it is slower than the B-26 and not near as sexy ;)

Mark
Logged
MarkAT

Keep the shiny side up!

Offline Fianna

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 571
Why no B-25?????
« Reply #5 on: February 06, 2007, 10:36:38 PM »
I'd rather have an A-26 than a B-25, although both would be nice.
Logged

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Why no B-25?????
« Reply #6 on: February 06, 2007, 10:49:35 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Mark Luper
I beleive when the game was in it's infancy it was decided to come up with a "different" two engined bomber than the B-25.


I think that applies to several choices made in the first generation of aircraft, like having the G-10, which was K-4 data (WB had a K-4) but with 20mm, gondolas, and rockets, to simulate the G-10 options.

I think there are a handful that were chosen "just to be different".
Logged

Offline hubsonfire

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8658
Why no B-25?????
« Reply #7 on: February 06, 2007, 11:23:18 PM »
While I can respect that, since HTC has made "those other games" look like a bunch of mooks, maybe it's time to add a few "bbs dork favorites" despite the fact that they were used in now defunct games. Like, as an example, the B-25, the P-39, the SeaHurri, the A-26, or anything else that I personally would like to have.
Logged
mook
++Blue Knights++

Proper punctuation and capitalization go a long way towards people paying attention to your posts.  -Stoney
I was wondering why I get ignored so often.  -Hitech

Offline Ball

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1827
Re: Why no B-25?????
« Reply #8 on: February 07, 2007, 01:19:26 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Tango
Just wondering.


Only aircraft which served in WWII can make the cut, sorry!!!1! :furious
Logged

Offline dtango

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1702
Why no B-25?????
« Reply #9 on: February 07, 2007, 08:09:53 AM »
Just guessing but for WarBirds Pyro and HT had created the B-25 so it might have been to avoid potential issues with WB.

BTW- having multiple Tango's is now getting a bit confusing!!! :rolleyes:

Tango, XO
412th FS Braunco Mustangs
Logged
Tango / Tango412 412th FS Braunco Mustangs
"At times it seems like people think they can chuck bunch of anecdotes into some converter which comes up with the flight model." (Wmaker)

Offline Slash27

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12798
Re: Re: Why no B-25?????
« Reply #10 on: February 07, 2007, 09:58:41 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Ball
Only aircraft which served in WWII can make the cut, sorry!!!1! :furious


but...:huh
Logged

Offline Donzo

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2355
      • http://www.bops.us
Re: Re: Why no B-25?????
« Reply #11 on: February 07, 2007, 10:38:12 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Ball
Only aircraft which served in WWII can make the cut, sorry!!!1! :furious


huh? :huh
Logged

Offline Tango

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1421
      • http://www.simpilots.org/
Why no B-25?????
« Reply #12 on: February 07, 2007, 04:36:15 PM »
Quote
BTW- having multiple Tango's is now getting a bit confusing!!! :rolleyes:

Tango, XO
412th FS Braunco Mustangs [/B]


I'm not confused. I'm the XO of the 78th Intruders. :D

Actually my in game tag is Tango78.
Logged
Tango78
78th Razorbacks
Historical Air Combat Group

Offline 715

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1835
Re: Re: Re: Why no B-25?????
« Reply #13 on: February 07, 2007, 08:22:44 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Ball  
Only aircraft which served in WWII can make the cut, sorry!!!1!

Quote
Originally posted by Donzo
huh? :huh


Maybe he's dyslexic and was thinking B52?
Logged

Offline Mark Luper

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1626
Re: Re: Why no B-25?????
« Reply #14 on: February 07, 2007, 09:17:44 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Ball
Only aircraft which served in WWII can make the cut, sorry!!!1! :furious


B-25 IS WWII or did you possibly read it wrong?

Mark
Logged
MarkAT

Keep the shiny side up!
Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Up
« previous next »