KKK expanding because of gay marriage and illegal immigration

[Excel1]

Originally posted by Red Tail 444
There was a go with the flow attitude 70 years ago. Even the English Blue Blood  Windsors (who were Old World Germans) didn't care about the Jews any more than the Americans did. And absolutely no one thoght the japanese invading nanking in 1931 was that much of an issue, either.

The wake-up call for Europe came when Hitler invaded Poland. Even that didn't piss the United States off until the Japanese paid us a visit.

It’s along time since I read Galland's book "the First and the Last" but from memory he makes a comment along the lines that if a German invasion of Britain from the continent had of taken place and been successful the commonwealth countries would have remained a threat to the occupation.  And by saying that, I think Galland was trying to minimize the importance of the Luftwaffe’s failure to defeat the RAF because he must have known that the chances of the rest of the commonwealth liberating Britain were probably zero. The war could have been effectively over in 1940

My point is that despite the appeasement and indifference to the rise of fascism in Europe in the 1930's I believe there was enough awareness  and  repulsion of the nazis through that period to give the added steel  to Britain's defence in 1940 and help avoid defeat.

But I think you have a good point. My original comment is thin, and hardly a shining example of collective harmony. But at least we still won.

[lukster]

Originally posted by Thrawn
Idiots, someone should tell them that it's ****ing that creates children, not marriage.

Marriage is for raising children. Anyone with a lick of sense can see that on the average people who grew up with a caring mother and father who were married to each other are happier and better adjusted than those who did not. Of course there are exceptions.

[Chairboy]

Lukster, then what's your objection to the Washington law being proposed that if couples don't produce children within 3 years, the marriage is annulled?

Can't have it both ways.  "Gay's can't marry each other because marriage is about children.  Straights can marry and not have children."

The law won't (and shouldn't) pass, but making the argument I put in quotes above is terribly hypocritical.  Just admit you don't want gays to marry each other because it's religiously objectionable or you don't like 'em.  It'd be refreshing to see some honesty, even if we still disagree.

[john9001]

Originally posted by Chairboy
Lukster, then what's your objection to the Washington law being proposed that if couples don't produce children within 3 years, the marriage is annulled?

isn't that what the king did, no heir, you chop off her head?

[lukster]

Originally posted by Chairboy
Lukster, then what's your objection to the Washington law being proposed that if couples don't produce children within 3 years, the marriage is annulled?

Can't have it both ways.  "Gay's can't marry each other because marriage is about children.  Straights can marry and not have children."

The law won't (and shouldn't) pass, but making the argument I put in quotes above is terribly hypocritical.  Just admit you don't want gays to marry each other because it's religiously objectionable or you don't like 'em.  It'd be refreshing to see some honesty, even if we still disagree.

Who is proposing such a stupid law?

I need not follow your rules in believing what the purpose of marriage is. I wasn't clear, children are not the only reason for marriage.

[Chairboy]

So, then are you ok with gay marriage, Lukster?

[lukster]

Originally posted by Chairboy
So, then are you ok with gay marriage, Lukster?

I am by nature sorta anti-social Chairboy. I lean towards live and let live and believe that our current government is far too invasive into our lives. With that said, I am not ok with being gay at all. However, it's not my place to tell someone else how they should live.

[lazs2]

chair...  I am not against gay marriage but I am against them piggybacking on to established marriage..

Let em get their own and fight for any bennies associated with their own.

They don't want to be married... they want tax breaks and health care and bennies.. they are very dishonest about this for the most part.

We have given the bennies to man and woman marriage (rightly or wrongly) because we felt that it was a benifit to us... they have the potential to breed and raise the nations youth.  

rightly or wrongly, they earned it...  the gays have done nothing but spread disease and guilt.   gay marriage won't raise their birth rate or lower their aids rate.  All it can do is cost taxpayers money.

lazs

[storch]

Originally posted by lazs2
chair...  I am not against gay marriage but I am against them piggybacking on to established marriage..

Let em get their own and fight for any bennies associated with their own.

They don't want to be married... they want tax breaks and health care and bennies.. they are very dishonest about this for the most part.

We have given the bennies to man and woman marriage (rightly or wrongly) because we felt that it was a benifit to us... they have the potential to breed and raise the nations youth.  

rightly or wrongly, they earned it...  the gays have done nothing but spread disease and guilt.   gay marriage won't raise their birth rate or lower their aids rate.  All it can do is cost taxpayers money.

lazs

how can they not be dishonest.  they would have us all believe that un natural sex is natural.  it is a dishonest group by difinition.