Author Topic: get replace the ta 152  (Read 3969 times)

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
get replace the ta 152
« Reply #60 on: February 27, 2007, 11:55:19 PM »
Morfiend, the 152C-0 saw action alongside the 152Hs, but only 2 of them. They were not a production model, and one of the requirements is "must be a production variant, no prototypes etc"

Offline morfiend

  • AH Training Corps
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10470
get replace the ta 152
« Reply #61 on: March 01, 2007, 11:44:24 PM »
have pix of ta squad,didnt see a C in the line up. Still would be nice to be able to up that monster:aok .... BTW thx for that imfo Krusty..........

  any sources I can read would be great.....

Offline kreighund

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 59
get replace the ta 152
« Reply #62 on: March 02, 2007, 01:03:06 AM »
Well with those requirements......

The F8F-1's were aboard the Bunker Hill in route to take part but the war ended before they could be blooded..............

and

there were six P-80A's in northern italy to try to take on the Me-262 but serviceability and they state of the air war over southern germany prevented any encounters


F7F-1 was also in production


well that should have wacked the hornet's nest!!!!!!!!!!

Offline Kweassa

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6425
get replace the ta 152
« Reply #63 on: March 02, 2007, 02:16:33 AM »
Quote
well that should have wacked the hornet's nest!!!!!!!!!!


 Not really.

 Another requirment is to be an actual combat aircraft - meaning that the plane, as a standard production model, served regular missions on normal squadron strength service and saw actual combat.

 The production numbers may be small, but the Ta152 and Me163 were all standard production aircraft that were placed in squadron strenght service that saw actual combat against Allied planes quite often. On the other hand, the P-80s were plagued with problems and served only a few patrol missions, the Bearcat was onlu en-route to the warzone when the war itself ended, and the Tigercat was in production only.

 Therefore, according to HTC's (unofficial) policy on aircraft requirements, the Ta152 and Me163 qualifies. The Bearcat, Tigercat, and the P-80s does not. The British Gloster Meteors qualifies, as does the He162 Volksjaeger, but the Soviet Bi-1 does not, and etc...

Offline Ball

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1827
get replace the ta 152
« Reply #64 on: March 02, 2007, 02:19:55 AM »
So why does the Spitfire XVI not fly with its max boost in Aces High?

Offline Anyone

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 307
get replace the ta 152
« Reply #65 on: March 02, 2007, 08:12:11 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Ball
So why does the Spitfire XVI not fly with its max boost in Aces High?


and why do the 190s flaps not deploy above 180?

Offline Ball

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1827
get replace the ta 152
« Reply #66 on: March 02, 2007, 12:42:46 PM »
Why is the Spitfire's view movement so limited compared to other aircraft?

Offline DblTrubl

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 180
get replace the ta 152
« Reply #67 on: March 02, 2007, 01:00:38 PM »
Because HTC hates you. :p

Offline Ball

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1827
get replace the ta 152
« Reply #68 on: March 02, 2007, 01:04:54 PM »
I dont fly spit, but hes he does hate me.

Pyro doesnt though.  He wants to rescue me. :)

Offline morfiend

  • AH Training Corps
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10470
get replace the ta 152
« Reply #69 on: March 02, 2007, 01:47:52 PM »
Krusty check ur PM's:noid

Offline Benny Moore

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1439
get replace the ta 152
« Reply #70 on: March 02, 2007, 04:57:28 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Kweassa
The production numbers may be small, but the Ta152 and Me163 were all standard production aircraft that were placed in squadron strenght service that saw actual combat against Allied planes quite often.


That's a bit of a stretch for the Ta-152.  Only perhaps twenty ever saw combat, and not often.  No more than sixty did, for sure.

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22416
Re: get replace the ta 152
« Reply #71 on: March 02, 2007, 05:24:24 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Jonny boy 8
im not trying to be a hater, but the ta 152 has to go. no one uses it. its made for high flying combat and no one goes over 35,000 ft just to have a dog fight or to bomb. (maybe sametimes they go that high) replace it with a diffrent aircraft like the P-80, or the He-111.


P51srule:aok


Tell you what, let's meet in the DA, you pick WHATEVER plane you want.    I'll fly the Ta and "show you how crappy this Cartoon Ta-152 H-1" is.
FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC

Offline Stang

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6127
get replace the ta 152
« Reply #72 on: March 02, 2007, 08:24:49 PM »
Moot and Tarmac used to pawn winging 152's.

Offline Kweassa

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6425
get replace the ta 152
« Reply #73 on: March 02, 2007, 10:19:45 PM »
Quote
That's a bit of a stretch for the Ta-152. Only perhaps twenty ever saw combat, and not often. No more than sixty did, for sure.


 It's true the production numbers were small. But they were; 1) regular production aircraft and not testbed/prototype/preproduction planes, 2) allocated for service in Stab./JG301, and 3) saw combat action for four months, until  late April 1945, and has a pilot which reached the 'ace' status in the plane.

 Qualifies in every category.
« Last Edit: March 02, 2007, 10:22:22 PM by Kweassa »

Offline Benny Moore

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1439
get replace the ta 152
« Reply #74 on: March 02, 2007, 10:26:15 PM »
Really?  I didn't think they fought more than a couple of times.  Maybe I should enable it in my planesets.