Author Topic: More Guncam AC vs. Tank  (Read 565 times)

Offline Geary420

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 833
More Guncam AC vs. Tank
« on: March 09, 2007, 03:03:47 AM »
Hey all, the stuka thread reminded me of this very short guncam clip I have had on my hard drive forever.  Don't remember where I found it but it wasn't labeled very good.  Anyone know what aircraft this is?  It is deffinatley a BFG!

Download Strafing.mpg

Offline frank3

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9352
More Guncam AC vs. Tank
« Reply #1 on: March 09, 2007, 11:53:06 AM »
In any case it's a tankbuster, since no fighter would shoot at tanks with less than .50's!
It could very well be a Ju-87?

Offline Meyer

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 156
More Guncam AC vs. Tank
« Reply #2 on: March 09, 2007, 01:07:21 PM »

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
More Guncam AC vs. Tank
« Reply #3 on: March 09, 2007, 01:19:53 PM »
EDIT: It says Hs129 at the link you've given us. It was a german ground attack aircraft. If I recall it had special 30mm guns
« Last Edit: March 09, 2007, 01:24:07 PM by Krusty »

Offline Ball

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1827
More Guncam AC vs. Tank
« Reply #4 on: March 09, 2007, 01:38:16 PM »
The HS-129 carried a lots of different guns, including a 75mm and 37mm if i remember correctly.

I think the 75mm messed up its already pretty poor performance though - aircraft was very much underpowered from what i have read.

Nice clip.  Thanks for sharing.

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
More Guncam AC vs. Tank
« Reply #5 on: March 09, 2007, 01:39:47 PM »
From what I understand the 75mm put the pilot's life in jeopardy every time he flew it. But in that clip, the aircraft doesn't have a huge pack/kit slung underneath so I'd think something smaller (internal) was used.

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23876
      • Last.FM Profile
More Guncam AC vs. Tank
« Reply #6 on: March 09, 2007, 01:57:06 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Krusty
From what I understand the 75mm put the pilot's life in jeopardy every time he flew it. But in that clip, the aircraft doesn't have a huge pack/kit slung underneath so I'd think something smaller (internal) was used.


Be careful with judgement. The plane doing the flyby can be a totally different than the one providing the guncam footage. Not saying that it is a 75mm, though.
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

Offline Ball

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1827
More Guncam AC vs. Tank
« Reply #7 on: March 09, 2007, 02:00:45 PM »
The slug is big... but the rate of fire also seems pretty fast, gets two rounds off in quick succession.

Anyone know the ROF of the 75mm?

You can see the second round looks like it goes right through the tank and hits the ground the other side.

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
More Guncam AC vs. Tank
« Reply #8 on: March 09, 2007, 02:03:27 PM »
Good point... they did have a knack for editing together unrelated footage...

Offline Meyer

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 156
More Guncam AC vs. Tank
« Reply #9 on: March 09, 2007, 02:25:48 PM »
My guess would be MK101..

Offline Airscrew

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4808
More Guncam AC vs. Tank
« Reply #10 on: March 09, 2007, 02:29:59 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Ball
The slug is big... but the rate of fire also seems pretty fast, gets two rounds off in quick succession.

Anyone know the ROF of the 75mm?

You can see the second round looks like it goes right through the tank and hits the ground the other side.

I dont know but it looks to me like its the third round and it looks like it ricocheted of the back of the tank.

You can see the recoil in the film, I would think the 75mm was hand loaded like the B-25?  I go for the 37mm

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
More Guncam AC vs. Tank
« Reply #11 on: March 09, 2007, 02:31:59 PM »
Negative, the 75mm wasn't hand-loaded. There was only 1 crew member.

However I don't think any self-loading 75mm can fire a round in a second or two. I think 30mm. My 2c.

Offline Lusche

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23876
      • Last.FM Profile
More Guncam AC vs. Tank
« Reply #12 on: March 09, 2007, 02:39:46 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Krusty
Negative, the 75mm wasn't hand-loaded. There was only 1 crew member.

However I don't think any self-loading 75mm can fire a round in a second or two. I think 30mm. My 2c.


I agree. I think it`s the 30mm MK101 some versions were using. The 101 has a very low ROF of only about 260rpm.
Steam: DrKalv
E:D Snailman

Offline Airscrew

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4808
More Guncam AC vs. Tank
« Reply #13 on: March 09, 2007, 02:48:52 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Lusche
I agree. I think it`s the 30mm MK101 some versions were using. The 101 has a very low ROF of only about 260rpm.


ok its hard to count, but it looks like from 5 almost 6 sec mark to 9 sec mark he fires 4 rounds,  3 on the tank and 1 over the tank.   from 5 to 8 sec 3 shots are fairly close together.  thats 1 round per sec, 60 rpm. course dont know if he's holding the fire button down or firing each round individually

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
More Guncam AC vs. Tank
« Reply #14 on: March 09, 2007, 02:53:50 PM »
Maybe not all rounds are tracers? (*shrug*)