Author Topic: New plane election  (Read 31479 times)

Offline CHECKERS

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1187
      • http://www.geocities.com/motorcity/1502/index.html
New plane election
« Reply #480 on: March 26, 2007, 07:31:21 AM »
A26 & LA 9  (fun stuff )  :t
Originally posted by Panman
God the BK's are some some ugly mo-fo's. Please no more pictures, I'm going blind Bet your mothers don't even love ya cause u'all sooooooooo F******* ulgy.

Offline Wmaker

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5743
      • Lentolaivue 34 website
New plane election
« Reply #481 on: March 26, 2007, 08:07:54 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Widewing
I doubt that P-39Qs in heavy service could attain more that 375 mph unless the ground crew dedicated a great amount of time to surface finish and panel fit. The P-39 had a relatively low CDo, but it was still greater than the P-51A's. Thus, I simply don't see them being as fast. The V1710-85 in the P-39Q was rated at 1,420 hp @ 9,700 feet. That's 270 hp more than the V1710-63 in the P-39D. So, 375 mph to 380 mph is probably pretty close to reality.


My toughts exactly. Thanks!
Wmaker
Lentolaivue 34

Thank you for the Brewster HTC!

Offline CPW

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 52
New plane election
« Reply #482 on: March 26, 2007, 09:53:27 AM »
I vote for G.55 and Ki44.:aok

Fiat G55/I

Max Speed 375mph at 6000m, 387 at 7,000m, 391 at 8000m

climb 7.2min to 6000m, 8.57min to 7000m, 10.18min to 8000m
(A better climb ability is reported that 7'12" as the time to reach 7000 m.)

Range (Internal) 746miles at 304mph, (2x22gal DT) 1,025miles at 354mph

Armament 1 x 20 with 380 rpg, 2 x 20 with 200 rpg, 2 x 12.7 with 300 rpg.

From”Ghttp://xoomer.alice.it/g55/index.htm

-------------------------------

Ki-44IIc

Max Speed 605km”ž5200m

climb 4.26min to 5000m

Range 1,060 miles

Armament 4 x 12.7 machine gun.

From”Ghttp://earth.endless.ne.jp/users/mac0115/ki44.html

Offline Gianlupo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5154
New plane election
« Reply #483 on: March 26, 2007, 10:42:04 AM »
CPW, I didn't check all the data about the G.55 given in that site, but I'd be careful: he claims that his data about ammo load of the Series I are from a book I have, and they're no correct... it has 250 rounds in the hub cannon.
Live to fly, fly to live!

Offline TankBstr

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 32
New plane election
« Reply #484 on: March 26, 2007, 10:56:29 AM »
+1 for the A26.

Offline theNewB

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 262
      • http://www.greatergermany.net
New plane election
« Reply #485 on: March 26, 2007, 12:55:18 PM »
he111!! sry g55 but my He111 is more important

Offline Gianlupo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5154
New plane election
« Reply #486 on: March 26, 2007, 01:11:40 PM »
Change your mind! I know you can! G.55... the He111 can wait! :D
Live to fly, fly to live!

Offline JB11

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 248
New plane election
« Reply #487 on: March 26, 2007, 01:25:38 PM »
How can you go wrong!!!!  Vote G.55!!!!!

I'm gonna kill me some Lala's!!!!!!!   :cool:
Never abandon the possibility of attack. Attack even from a position of inferiority, to disrupt the enemy's plans. This often results in improving one's own position. - General Adolf Galland, Luftwaffe
Proverbs 3:5,6

Offline aerosaber

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 93
      • http://www.tampapi.com
B25
« Reply #488 on: March 26, 2007, 01:31:36 PM »
B25  How could it not be there..The Tokyo Bomber. This plane should have been here already.

Offline SKJohn

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 792
New plane election
« Reply #489 on: March 26, 2007, 02:30:40 PM »
Fighter: KI-43
Bomber: B-25

Offline airmess

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 501
New plane election
« Reply #490 on: March 26, 2007, 02:37:49 PM »
YAK 3
Intel QuadCore 9350
Asus P-5E
Nvisia 9800 GTX
8GB Ram
Samsung 245B

Offline -CodyC

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 175
Sold
« Reply #491 on: March 26, 2007, 02:59:35 PM »
G.55 gets my vote

Been reading some stuff online and can't find very many positives about the brewster buffalo other than the Fins were able to net the most gains from it with a reported 26:1 kill ratio(during the later part of the war when the Germans were retreating).  Americans rejected it after midway, anyone got any useful links with info on the history of this plane?

Second place for me would be the p39.

lwcody

Offline Panzzer

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2890
New plane election
« Reply #492 on: March 26, 2007, 03:11:44 PM »
Dan Ford's site has excellent Brewster material, here.
Panzzer - Lentorykmentti 3

Offline ghi

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2669
New plane election
« Reply #493 on: March 26, 2007, 03:33:42 PM »
TU-2 ,  

 East front/russian  need a bomber with formation option,
like,

 German - ju88s,
Japanesse - ki-67,
USAF---B17,24,26,
RAF--lancs

 i don't say the other sides are well represented with models in game, but Red Army /east front is not represented at all,


 

Offline scottydawg

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1759
      • http://www.332nd.org
New plane election
« Reply #494 on: March 26, 2007, 03:37:10 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by ghi
TU-2 ,  

 East front/russian  need a bomber with formation option,
like,

 German - ju88s,
Japanesse - ki-67,
USAF---B17,24,26,
RAF--lancs

 i don't say the other sides are well represented with models in game, but Red Army /east front is not represented at all,


 


Did they do much bombing?  Just wondering... that plane looks like it can hold about a six pack of beer and that's it. :)