Author Topic: Iar 80  (Read 1472 times)

Offline Masherbrum

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 22416
Iar 80
« Reply #30 on: March 30, 2007, 03:36:54 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by frank3
Seeing those pictures makes me think of the FW-190, alot of similarities!


That is what the Allies thought it was when first encountered.
FSO Squad 412th FNVG
http://worldfamousfridaynighters.com/
Co-Founder of DFC

Offline JAWS2003

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 361
Iar 80
« Reply #31 on: March 30, 2007, 03:38:18 PM »
The Romanians were asking throughout the war for BMW-801 engine (the one in the FW-190) , to put in the  IAR-80.  They asked for licence to build it in Romania but they couldn't get it.

The Gnome Rhone  engine used on the IAR reached it's peak at the begining of the war but the Romanians didn't have another engine to put in the plane.

 That's why in 1943 they had to buy BF-109G's from Germany and started licence building complete BF-109's, instead of building only the BMW-801 engine and strap them to the IAR-80. BMW-801  engine was about the same size with the K-1000 and would have been the best choice for the airframe.

 With the BMW engine straped on the light airframe of the IAR-80.the new IAR would have been one of the best front line fighters in the east. Right up there with FW-190 and La5-fn.
 Had generous wing area, great visibility, with the Mauser cannons it had good enough firepower and it could have been a succesful fighter.

  But it was not to be.:cry

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6864

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6864
Iar 80
« Reply #33 on: March 31, 2007, 09:35:33 AM »
PS. The drawings in the links above should be good enough for anyone who wants to model the IAR80 for Aces High.