Author Topic: Change of schedule: Brewster lobbying thread  (Read 671 times)

Offline Panzzer

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2890
Change of schedule: Brewster lobbying thread
« on: March 22, 2007, 05:05:10 PM »


The thread isn't in here, it's ---> here <---

Just for your information.

Panzzer - Lentorykmentti 3

Offline Husky01

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4844
Change of schedule: Brewster lobbying thread
« Reply #1 on: March 22, 2007, 05:08:12 PM »
ZCopier!
BearKats
9GIAP VVS RKKA

Offline Ball

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1827
Change of schedule: Brewster lobbying thread
« Reply #2 on: March 22, 2007, 05:09:49 PM »
hope it gets locked for punting. :t

Offline wasq

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1610
      • Photos
Change of schedule: Brewster lobbying thread
« Reply #3 on: March 22, 2007, 05:11:45 PM »
I don't see why it should be closed, as it is very relevant to the current situation.

Anyway, here's the link: link  if it gets locked. :)

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23047
Change of schedule: Brewster lobbying thread
« Reply #4 on: March 22, 2007, 05:12:28 PM »
So, explain again why the A6M2's thrashed the US version of it and the Finnish version smeared the I-16-24s again?

;)
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline wasq

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1610
      • Photos
Change of schedule: Brewster lobbying thread
« Reply #5 on: March 22, 2007, 05:14:56 PM »
Unfortunately the score link I had in the previous thread has disappeared, but the Brewster got many kills of La-5, Spitfire mk 5 and other later war frontline fighters. I can try to dig out that data again.

Offline Saxman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9155
Change of schedule: Brewster lobbying thread
« Reply #6 on: March 22, 2007, 05:52:12 PM »
'Cause the US version was underarmed, overweight and underpowered?

Or were you just being rhetorical?
Ron White says you can't fix stupid. I beg to differ. Stupid will usually sort itself out, it's just a matter of making sure you're not close enough to become collateral damage.

Offline wasq

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1610
      • Photos
Change of schedule: Brewster lobbying thread
« Reply #7 on: March 22, 2007, 05:55:07 PM »
Yes, the US version was all of that. Finnish version was powered with the same powerplant but with reduced weight it was enough of an edge until 1943 against the Soviets.

Offline Squire

  • Aces High CM Staff (Retired)
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7683
Change of schedule: Brewster lobbying thread
« Reply #8 on: March 22, 2007, 06:26:09 PM »
"So, explain again why the A6M2's thrashed the US version of it"

Easy, in its only air combat with the US it was outnumbered 118 to 26 at Midway.

7 F4Fs and 19 Brewsters vs 36 A6M2 Zeros (4 squads of 9) and 72 Attack a/c (36 Kate bombers and 36 Vals), the USMC put up a very tough fight, losing 19 of their # in the melee, fighting the Zero for the 1st time and knowing little about its strengths and weaknesses.

...that and I guess the Finns didnt ever fight the IJN? they fought Russian pilots with probably 1/4 of the training in hours (and thats probably generous), in a/c that were much less manueverable. The most inexperienced Zero pilot at Pearl Harbor had 1000 hours in fighters.

Kinda apples and oranges, some LaGG noob vs an A6M2 Zero naval pilot in a dogfight. Who you going to bet on?

That being said the Finns did remarkably in the Brewster, being both out numbered and in many cases out classed. I take nothing away from their combat record.
Warloc
Friday Squad Ops CM Team
1841 Squadron Fleet Air Arm
Aces High since Tour 24

Offline wasq

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1610
      • Photos
Change of schedule: Brewster lobbying thread
« Reply #9 on: March 22, 2007, 06:42:00 PM »
Squire, you're right about all the points you made.

I'd like to point out that the Finns were faced with some of the elite unites of the VVS, (e.g. some Guards regiments), but in general, their competence was not very high. Also, the Brewsters did shoot down quite a many of the later-war monsters, such as the La-5 and Spitfire-V.

Offline Oldman731

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9419
Change of schedule: Brewster lobbying thread
« Reply #10 on: March 22, 2007, 09:07:00 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Squire
"So, explain again why the A6M2's thrashed the US version of it"

Easy, in its only air combat with the US it was outnumbered 118 to 26 at Midway.

It didn't work too well for the British in Malaysia, either.  Finns were the only ones who had any success in the Buffalo.

It was a rare plane in real life (which was merciful), but we do run FinnRus quite often in AvA and a real Buffalo - or, more appropriately, the version the Finns flew - would be a lot of fun there.  I can't imagine anyone wanting to fly a stock Buffalo in the Early War arena, though.

- oldman

Offline hubsonfire

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8658
Change of schedule: Brewster lobbying thread
« Reply #11 on: March 22, 2007, 09:17:29 PM »
I hate to admit it, but it is time to add the brewster, for the AvA setups and scenarios, but primarily because all these damned Finns are increasingly becoming an obstacle that separates me from my P-39s and B-25s.

Vote Brewster and get it out of the way. We've bigger fish to fry. ;)
mook
++Blue Knights++

Proper punctuation and capitalization go a long way towards people paying attention to your posts.  -Stoney
I was wondering why I get ignored so often.  -Hitech

Offline quintv

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 188
Change of schedule: Brewster lobbying thread
« Reply #12 on: March 22, 2007, 09:22:14 PM »

Offline Wmaker

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5743
      • Lentolaivue 34 website
Change of schedule: Brewster lobbying thread
« Reply #13 on: March 22, 2007, 09:23:59 PM »
Thank for the pic quintv!

Brewster shot down those in rows. :)
Wmaker
Lentolaivue 34

Thank you for the Brewster HTC!

Offline 1K3

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3449
Change of schedule: Brewster lobbying thread
« Reply #14 on: March 22, 2007, 10:25:03 PM »
If we get the Brewster, then we should have 2 variants...

F2A-1 US Navy variant.


B-239 Finland AF variant.
« Last Edit: March 22, 2007, 10:27:45 PM by 1K3 »