Author Topic: new tanks (Read 662 times)

AApache · « **on:** March 23, 2007, 08:45:22 AM »

Be nice to have the King Tiger tank or the panther added to the list

BaldEagl · « **Reply #1 on:** March 23, 2007, 08:57:02 AM »

I agree on the Panther.

VooWho · « **Reply #2 on:** March 23, 2007, 12:40:35 PM »

I like the panther but I would rather see sissy tanks now instead of muscle tanks. Too many muscle tanks, means we can't get many sissy tanks because they couldn't match up with the muscle tanks. I want a crappy, under armored, underpower cannon tank, like a Panzer III or something besides the Sherman Firefly (which is nice though) or a British Challanger, Matilda, or churchill.

Bronk · « **Reply #3 on:** March 23, 2007, 01:05:12 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by VooWho
I like the panther but I would rather see sissy tanks now instead of muscle tanks. Too many muscle tanks, means we can't get many sissy tanks because they couldn't match up with the muscle tanks. I want a crappy, under armored, underpower cannon tank, like a Panzer III or something besides the Sherman Firefly (which is nice though) or a British Challanger, Matilda, or churchill.

I kind of agree here.
I think one of the main reasons for lack of players in EW/MW is..........

lack of AC/GV selection.

Once those sets are filled out a bit more, I'd bet they see more use.

Bronk

BaldEagl · « **Reply #4 on:** March 23, 2007, 03:31:00 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Bronk
I kind of agree here.
I think one of the main reasons for lack of players in EW/MW is..........

lack of AC/GV selection.

Once those sets are filled out a bit more, I'd bet they see more use.

Bronk

Well, when you put it that way I don't play the vehicle game in EW or MW at all for exactly that reason. The selection is awful.

I still would like to see the Panther though.

Treize69 · « **Reply #5 on:** March 23, 2007, 03:58:48 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by VooWho
I like the panther but I would rather see sissy tanks now instead of muscle tanks. Too many muscle tanks, means we can't get many sissy tanks because they couldn't match up with the muscle tanks. I want a crappy, under armored, underpower cannon tank, like a Panzer III or something besides the Sherman Firefly (which is nice though) or a British Challanger, Matilda, or churchill.

Type 95 into Aces High!

Wes14 · « **Reply #6 on:** March 23, 2007, 04:31:57 PM »

let me guess a tracked version of the M8:D
but made by Chinese?

Treize69 · « **Reply #7 on:** March 23, 2007, 04:45:34 PM »

Japanese Light Tank, one of their better ones actually.

The Japanese tank with the highest production number. It took part in all the campaigns in the Far-East and the Pacific area. Despite its failings (lack of protection, insufficient gun, ...) its mobility made it popular with its crews. It stayed in production until 1943, long after better tanks had been produced. It stayed in service until the end.

Weight: 8.1 tons
Crew: three
Armour: hull front, sides and rear 12 mm; turret front, sides and rear 12 mm
Armament: one 37-mm Type 94 gun mounted in turret; one 7.7-mm Type 97 machine-gun mounted in turret; one 7.7-mm Type 97 machine-gun mounted in hull
Engine: one 110 hp six-cylinder air-cooled diesel engine
Dimensions: width 6 feet, 9 inches; length 14 feet, 4.5 inches; height 7 feet, 2 inches
Max Speed: 30 mph Max Range: 110 miles

Wes14 · « **Reply #8 on:** March 23, 2007, 04:57:26 PM »

hey thanks i actually learned something

frank3 · « **Reply #9 on:** March 24, 2007, 07:54:18 AM »

That turret looks cramped, let alone claustrofobic! How did they reload the gun? Must've been a hassle

Spikes · « **Reply #10 on:** March 24, 2007, 08:04:47 AM »

Jonny boy 8 · « **Reply #11 on:** March 24, 2007, 08:12:36 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by spikes

thats funny:lol

p51srule:aok

Wes14 · « **Reply #12 on:** March 24, 2007, 04:37:19 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by spikes

Spike..that would olny be able to shoot out a tire on a jeep,or kill a cartoon person:D