Originally posted by moot Ripley I don't see where I should understand that "[an] experimental price cut boosted sales with 100%."Is this it?"Consumer wants lower prices: Providers say no and raise prices. Then point declining sales growth figures being caused by piracy despite their own price raises caused them. Oh, and the fact that 50% less new titles were launched during the period. Duh..Consumer complains about having to pay full album price for 1-2 songs: Providers say tough luck. Buy them in separate singles and pay full album price for the inconvenience."Splitting hairs anyway
Consumer wants lower prices: Aint gonna happen, despite the fact that trials on lowered prices boosted sales over 100%.
Originally posted by moot Yep, you do that... squeeze the inspired artistry out of artists using "regulations"
