Originally posted by Treize69
Sorry Lupo, no anti-Italian sentiment is meant, just the justification for the plane by saying that the ANR used it. It was an extremely limited run aircraft, hardly used at all, and doesn't really offer anything the C.205 can't already do.
Np, Treize, I know you are a good guy

But, again, I have to object: extremely limited run aircraft...?? no, they were run hard, to consumption! You always have to judge what the plane did in relation to the size of the air force that used it.. they were few, but they fought like devils, till the end, along with their machines. It doesn't really offer anything the C.205 can't already do...?? Sorry, wrong again. External similarities means nothing, they were 2 really different planes, just think about the wing loading (G.55 has a lighter one, meaning more maneuverability) and the wing surface (G.55 has the bigger, meaning better handling and stability at high altitude)... no, it'd offer something different.
I would kill to get the IAR in game, but I've already resigned myself to the fact that it'll never happen. We already have enough low-number, limited impact planes in the game that almost never see use (like the C.202 and C.205...), just can't justify devoting development time to a future hangar queen that only 5 people will fly more than once or twice a tour.
Treize, never say never... what you're saying is what I thought just a month ago, looking at Target Tobruk... now we're voting for the G.55!

And, sorry for being that picky, but, again, you're wrong about the C.202, it was one of the most widely used fighters for Italy...

Got the quote from http://www.ww2wings.com
Cc... I think a good book is still the best reading... it doesn't seems to me that website is much accurate on Italy...
