Author Topic: L.A.'s Ugly End?  (Read 1996 times)

Offline Xargos

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4281
L.A.'s Ugly End?
« Reply #15 on: April 02, 2007, 11:47:50 AM »
So that means the CIA can do anything it wants to in other countries and the U.S. government can't be held responsible?

You did say Civilian.
« Last Edit: April 02, 2007, 11:49:59 AM by Xargos »
Jeffery R."Xargos" Ward

"At least I have chicken." 
Member DFC

Offline Viking

  • Personal Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2867
L.A.'s Ugly End?
« Reply #16 on: April 02, 2007, 11:55:24 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Xargos
So that means the CIA can do anything it wants to in other countries and the U.S. government can't be held responsible?

You did say Civilian.


CIA operatives are not civilian. They are agents of the Federal US Government.

Offline Xargos

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4281
L.A.'s Ugly End?
« Reply #17 on: April 02, 2007, 11:58:13 AM »
Just like the drug dealers are agents of the Mexican government.
Jeffery R."Xargos" Ward

"At least I have chicken." 
Member DFC

Offline Viking

  • Personal Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2867
L.A.'s Ugly End?
« Reply #18 on: April 02, 2007, 11:59:55 AM »
And captured under-cover CIA operatives have on numerous occasions been "disowned" by the US government for exactly the purpose of denying responsibility for the actions of the agent. It is common practice.

Offline Viking

  • Personal Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2867
L.A.'s Ugly End?
« Reply #19 on: April 02, 2007, 12:00:28 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Xargos
Just like the drug dealers are agents of the Mexican government.


Are they employed by the Mexican government?

Offline Mightytboy

  • Parolee
  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 176
L.A.'s Ugly End?
« Reply #20 on: April 02, 2007, 12:05:09 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Viking
Are they employed by the Mexican government?


No but the Mexican Govt is employed by the Drug dealers so it's the same thing.

Offline Hornet33

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2487
L.A.'s Ugly End?
« Reply #21 on: April 02, 2007, 12:06:49 PM »
What about Mexican Army units providing cover for drug smugglers along the Texas border. Videos of this happening have been aired on TV. That isn't an act of war?? How about the Mexican governments protest concerning the US efforts to secure our southern boarder? They've already stated that if the US goes forward with a boarder fence they will take it the UN because it would destabilize their country. What kind of BS is that?
AHII Con 2006, HiTech, "This game is all about pissing off the other guy!!"

Offline Xargos

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4281
L.A.'s Ugly End?
« Reply #22 on: April 02, 2007, 12:08:49 PM »
So what you are saying is that it would be alright if I got a bunch of my friend together and we made strikes into mexico and the U.S. government made no attempts to stop us?  And even more the U.S. Government gave us maps on the best places to strike?
« Last Edit: April 02, 2007, 12:11:02 PM by Xargos »
Jeffery R."Xargos" Ward

"At least I have chicken." 
Member DFC

Offline GtoRA2

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8339
L.A.'s Ugly End?
« Reply #23 on: April 02, 2007, 12:11:22 PM »
I think its time to call our troops home. Then send them to mexico.  Mexico could be states 51 through 58.

Problem solved.
;)

Offline john9001

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9453
L.A.'s Ugly End?
« Reply #24 on: April 02, 2007, 12:13:20 PM »
round them up and send them to vikingland, lets see how mr viking deals with them.

Offline Xargos

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4281
L.A.'s Ugly End?
« Reply #25 on: April 02, 2007, 12:14:56 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by john9001
round them up and send them to vikingland, lets see how mr viking deals with them.


:aok
Jeffery R."Xargos" Ward

"At least I have chicken." 
Member DFC

Offline Viking

  • Personal Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2867
L.A.'s Ugly End?
« Reply #26 on: April 02, 2007, 12:33:24 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Xargos
So what you are saying is that it would be alright if I got a bunch of my friend together and we made strikes into mexico and the U.S. government made no attempts to stop us?  And even more the U.S. Government gave us maps on the best places to strike?


Yes, that would not be an act of war. The US government is not subject to Mexican law.

Edit: Supporting guerillas either financially or logistically has never been considered an act of war against the nation the guerillas are fighting. An act of "unfriendliness" yes, "war" no.
« Last Edit: April 02, 2007, 12:50:13 PM by Viking »

Offline rpm

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15661
L.A.'s Ugly End?
« Reply #27 on: April 02, 2007, 12:34:31 PM »
I don't know what you're all upset about. President Bush just built a new fence on the border. It's all good now.
My mind is a raging torrent, flooded with rivulets of thought cascading into a waterfall of creative alternatives.
Stay thirsty my friends.

Offline Viking

  • Personal Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2867
L.A.'s Ugly End?
« Reply #28 on: April 02, 2007, 12:45:59 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by john9001
round them up and send them to vikingland, lets see how mr viking deals with them.


We will deal with them like we deal with all illegal immigrants. Put them in camps, process their refugee claims, if any, and then ship them to wherever they came from.

Offline Hornet33

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2487
L.A.'s Ugly End?
« Reply #29 on: April 02, 2007, 02:10:49 PM »
Yeah you'd do that but if we tried that here in the US, you and the rest of the world would scream bloody murder about how unfairly the US treats illegal immigrants. Look how the world is responding to the US building a fence to protect OUR borders. Every country in south america is *****ing about it. Saying it's unfair that we would even consider keeping the poor and oppressed people of south america from entering our country. It's all a bunch of BS, because we're damned if we do and damned if we don't. I personaly feel that the fact that the president of Mexico went on world wide TV and said he would do everything in his power to prevent a fence from being built on OUR side of the border is a hostile act and should be treated as such.

I think instead of spending the money on a fence that money should be paid to volunters to patrol the boarder and have permission to shoot on sight anyone attempting to cross the border anywhere other than a designated border entry station.  Any armed response from the south side of the border should be responded too with maximum force by the US Military and be considered an act of war against the US.

The rest of the world doesn't like it, too damn bad.
AHII Con 2006, HiTech, "This game is all about pissing off the other guy!!"