Author Topic: Editorial... (or not) (Read 3717 times)

eskimo2 · « **Reply #105 on:** April 08, 2007, 08:12:00 PM »

Lunger,

Captain Virgil Hilts post was spot on.

Lunger · « **Reply #106 on:** April 08, 2007, 08:19:54 PM »

first my courage is nothing you should attack without knowing the man. If that is the route you need to go with your arguement then you are already beaten.

I told you to quote me saying the P39 was not worthy. I knew you could not do this because I knew I didnt say it. So, you then attempted to interperate my posts innorder to validate your arguement. still no proof I said it was "unworthy".

Now you are attempting to attack my character from the safty of your computer desk.

I ask you who is the Coward. its time for you to do a little introspective.

Masherbrum · « **Reply #107 on:** April 08, 2007, 08:20:05 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Captain Virgil Hilts
I took about 2 minutes to quote your posts stating a vote for the P-39 was a wasted vote. I wouldn't waste 3 hours on you. You can't even muster the courage and dignity to stand behind your own statements. I missed the point? Not hardly. The point is on your head. Empty as it is, at least it has a sharp point. Which is more than can be said for your argument and your position.

Agree.

Captain Virgil Hilts · « **Reply #108 on:** April 08, 2007, 08:26:41 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Lunger
first my courage is nothing you should attack without knowing the man. If that is the route you need to go with your arguement then you are already beaten.

I told you to quote me saying the P39 was not worthy. I knew you could not do this because I knew I didnt say it. So, you then attempted to interperate my posts innorder to validate your arguement. still no proof I said it was "unworthy".

Now you are attempting to attack my character from the safty of your computer desk.

I ask you who is the Coward. its time for you to do a little introspective.

Did I not quote you DIRECTLY? I did. Did I edit your words? I did not.

Did you or did you not say a vote for the P-39 was a wasted vote? That leaves no room for error. Or, do you wish to try to wiggle your way out of it? Explain to us how a vote for the P-39 being a wasted vote can mean anything other than the plane isn't worthy of being added to the game.

Either the plane is worthy of adding to the game, and a vote for it is a well placed vote, or the plane is not worthy of adding to the game and a vote for it is wasted. You can't have it both ways.

I do not care to know you. You obviously are lacking in what it takes to make any defense of your statements. You said it, but you won't acknowledge or support it.

I can assure you that any reply I make to you on these bulletin boards I would make in person. Quite willingly, and without hesitation.

Lunger · « **Reply #109 on:** April 08, 2007, 08:31:23 PM »

One more chance big guy quote me saying "the P39 and the B25 are unworthy" you cant because i didnt say it!! I did say and I do beleive that it is a wasted vote and will be a hanger queen but before you say that I've said something do a little research and less assumption.

you know what they say about assumption "it makes an A** out of you and umption!!!"

Captain Virgil Hilts · « **Reply #110 on:** April 08, 2007, 08:34:05 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Lunger
One more chance big guy quote me saying "the P39 and the B25 are unworthy" you cant because i didnt say it!! I did say and I do beleive that it is a wasted vote and will be a hanger queen but before you say that I've said something do a little research and less assumption.

you know what they say about assumption "it makes an A** out of you and umption!!!"

I quoted you repeatedly. You said a vote for the P-39 is a wasted vote. That can have no other meaning than the plane is not worthy of being added. Twist and spin however you want, since you cannot make an adequate defense of your argument, that's all you can do. I'm done with you. You have no defense of your position, and you resort to silly innuendo and attempts at diversion. Blather on all you want, I've proven my point. You ain't worth the effort.

Lunger · « **Reply #111 on:** April 08, 2007, 08:40:24 PM »

Ok so like I thought but you obviously dont have the courage or intestinal fortitude to admit I never said the P39 or the B25 was unworthy. its about time:aok

eskimo2 · « **Reply #112 on:** April 08, 2007, 08:45:28 PM »

syn·o·nym
–noun 1. a word having the same or nearly the same meaning as another in the language, as joyful, elated, glad.
2. a word or expression accepted as another name for something, as Arcadia for pastoral simplicity; metonym.

E25280 · « **Reply #113 on:** April 08, 2007, 08:55:01 PM »

By my count:

Captain Virgil Hilts: 4
Lunger: 0

Feel free to check my math.

Magellan · « **Reply #114 on:** April 08, 2007, 08:55:46 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Captain Virgil Hilts
I quoted you repeatedly. You said a vote for the P-39 is a wasted vote. That can have no other meaning than the plane is not worthy of being added. Twist and spin however you want [snip]

Savage,
I guess it's like calling you a prevaricator--but he never said you were a liar.

E25280 · « **Reply #115 on:** April 08, 2007, 08:57:34 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Magellan
Savage,
I guess it's like calling you a prevaricator--but he never said you were a liar.

It depends on what your definition of "said" is.

Masherbrum · « **Reply #116 on:** April 08, 2007, 09:02:47 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Lunger
Ok so like I thought but you obviously dont have the courage or intestinal fortitude to admit I never said the P39 or the B25 was unworthy. its about time:aok

Wow, is your arm tired of shoveling watermelon yet?

Lunger · « **Reply #117 on:** April 08, 2007, 09:06:57 PM »

I'm not the least bit tired of watching this guy attempt to convince himself that he knows what hes talking about. I could do this all day.

Lunger · « **Reply #118 on:** April 08, 2007, 09:28:49 PM »

The bottom line is I would love to see every possible WWII airframe in AHII. thats why I know I never said it was unworthy, but if we have to have only 1 id like to see something more usefull for everyone. So take a little time and look back at the posts and tell me when I bagged on people for voting for the P39 or said it was unwothy. you cant because I HAVENT SAID IT. Better choice = unworthy i dont think so.. try another route.

Slash27 · « **Reply #119 on:** April 08, 2007, 09:30:44 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Lunger
I'm not the least bit tired of watching this guy attempt to convince himself that he knows what hes talking about. I could do this all day.

Dude, you are in over your head.