Author Topic: P-39 & P-63 Stalls, Spins & Spin Recovery Procedure  (Read 1190 times)

Offline eskimo2

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7207
      • hallbuzz.com
P-39 & P-63 Stalls, Spins & Spin Recovery Procedure
« Reply #15 on: April 07, 2007, 09:35:42 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by moot


Now there's just no excuse for that tubby thing!

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
Re: P-39 & P-63 Stalls, Spins & Spin Recovery Procedure
« Reply #16 on: April 07, 2007, 06:33:56 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by eskimo2
The P-39 and P-63 are very similar aircraft in balance, layout,
appearance and flying characteristics.



Not really. The P-39 had a lot more problems. Later versions tried to lessen them by installing more v-stab surface area, and even by reducing the prop blades from 4 to 3 to help reduce the instability.

The P-63 took all of these considerations and redesigned the entire shape of the aircraft to help reduce the instability.

P-39s would fly somewhat worse than P-63s because of this.

Offline eskimo2

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7207
      • hallbuzz.com
Re: Re: P-39 & P-63 Stalls, Spins & Spin Recovery Procedure
« Reply #17 on: April 07, 2007, 07:19:45 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Krusty
Not really. The P-39 had a lot more problems. Later versions tried to lessen them by installing more v-stab surface area, and even by reducing the prop blades from 4 to 3 to help reduce the instability.

The P-63 took all of these considerations and redesigned the entire shape of the aircraft to help reduce the instability.

P-39s would fly somewhat worse than P-63s because of this.


Yea, I just asked him about this and he pretty much said that.  He said that they were instructed not to spin the P-63 and to absolutely never spin the P-39.  The Bell test pilots spun them and always recovered but apparently the Army didn’t think it was such a bright idea.

Offline Gianlupo

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5154
P-39 & P-63 Stalls, Spins & Spin Recovery Procedure
« Reply #18 on: April 07, 2007, 07:25:51 PM »
Excuse me, gents, but on behalf of italian national pride, I claim the honour for my country of having been the first one to build fat, barrel airplanes! :D











« Last Edit: April 07, 2007, 07:31:15 PM by Gianlupo »
Live to fly, fly to live!

Offline BaDkaRmA158Th

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2542
P-39 & P-63 Stalls, Spins & Spin Recovery Procedure
« Reply #19 on: April 07, 2007, 08:56:51 PM »
Wounder how it flew.
~383Rd RTC/CH BW/AG~
BaDfaRmA

My signature says "Our commitment to diplomacy will never inhibit our willingness to kick a$s."

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
P-39 & P-63 Stalls, Spins & Spin Recovery Procedure
« Reply #20 on: April 07, 2007, 09:04:13 PM »
It's got wings, doesn't it??


P.S. LYNCH THE ITALIANS!!!! They've built craft designed by Satan! :t

Offline Brooke

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15718
      • http://www.electraforge.com/brooke/
P-39 & P-63 Stalls, Spins & Spin Recovery Procedure
« Reply #21 on: April 08, 2007, 03:27:34 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Wilbus
Hehehe, that was kind of funy ;)

Yup Kweassa, the ta 183 was the father of them all, however, I didn't dare say it as I'd be jumped by every yank on the forum (well almost) ;)

Oh btw, thanks for the spin/stall chart, always nice to see something from the original manuals.


This reminds me of a great line in the film Ice Station Zebra, where Patrick McGoohan's character says, "The Russians put our camera made by our German scientists and your film made by your German scientists into their satellite made by their German scientists."

Offline TimRas

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 560
P-39 & P-63 Stalls, Spins & Spin Recovery Procedure
« Reply #22 on: April 08, 2007, 03:35:44 AM »
Stall recover procedure for P-39Q. It seems more difficult than in P-63.




From the "Pre-flight Curriculum for the P-39":



Offline Wilbus

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4472
P-39 & P-63 Stalls, Spins & Spin Recovery Procedure
« Reply #23 on: April 08, 2007, 05:13:46 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Brooke
This reminds me of a great line in the film Ice Station Zebra, where Patrick McGoohan's character says, "The Russians put our camera made by our German scientists and your film made by your German scientists into their satellite made by their German scientists."


:rofl

I've seen the film but don't remember that line. So true though.
Rasmus "Wilbus" Mattsson

Liberating Livestock since 1998, recently returned from a 5 year Sheep-care training camp.

Offline Kweassa

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6425
P-39 & P-63 Stalls, Spins & Spin Recovery Procedure
« Reply #24 on: April 08, 2007, 07:34:47 AM »
My guess is this barrel obsession clearly demonstrates a German ancestry.

 It's a beer thing.

Offline Swoop73

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 90
P-39 & P-63 Stalls, Spins & Spin Recovery Procedure
« Reply #25 on: April 08, 2007, 10:19:19 AM »
Wilbus.....The plane ballances just fine. Where they put the engine has nothing to do with the CG. The engine was back there to cut down on frontal area and to make it easy to stuff in the mother of all cannon. It was an idea worth trying. Most WW2 fighters and most fighters by definition are designed with the CG as far aft as they think they can get away with because this gives the lightest stick forces. The price you pay is usually poor spin recovery....Depending on what you consider poor.

Some pilots loved the design...Chuck Yeager and most of the Russians....Others didn't.

Swoop73
"Had to...Had to keep 'em from the bombers"
325th Ace Art Fiedler on why he and 3 other Checkertails
charged into 40 FW 190's over Regensburg, Germany in Jan., 1945.

Offline Widewing

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8801
P-39 & P-63 Stalls, Spins & Spin Recovery Procedure
« Reply #26 on: April 08, 2007, 11:06:10 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by TimRas
Stall recover procedure for P-39Q. It seems more difficult than in P-63.


I don't think that there's much difference in the procedure. There is just a more explicit warning in the P-39 manual.

Many WWII fighters had nasty spin behavior, including the P-51 which frequently required 7,000 to 10,000 feet to recover.

Certainly, it won't be as difficult as trying to get the AH2 Mossy out of a flat spin.

By the way gents, the fastest way to get the Mossy out of a flat spin is to shut down the engines (not just pull power off to idle, but shut them off altogether).

I've been air spawning various aircraft at 30k to test spin recovery. When air spawned, the mossy immediately enters a flat spin (you cannot prevent it). The fastest way to recover is to not start the engines... She will nose over all by herself. If you do start the engines, you'll just have to shut them off.

My regards,

Widewing
My regards,

Widewing

YGBSM. Retired Member of Aces High Trainer Corps, Past President of the DFC, retired from flying as Tredlite.