Author Topic: Why the B25? Yossarian! yay! (Read 1187 times)

bj229r · « **Reply #15 on:** April 09, 2007, 07:04:18 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by Dowding
The film is poor.

The book is a classic.

yup--one of the best 5 books ive ever read

Rino · « **Reply #16 on:** April 09, 2007, 10:16:48 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by john9001
two weekers could not vote.

Two -weekers is a frame of mind rather than a set date

Tails · « **Reply #17 on:** April 09, 2007, 10:22:30 PM »

I originally voted Me-410. But when that dropped out, I switched to the B-25. Still hoping to get a 75mm spud gun with it.

AquaShrimp · « **Reply #18 on:** April 10, 2007, 02:36:56 AM »

B-25H will be the scourge of GVers. Anyone have any data on whether a 75mm shell will penetrate the roof armor of a Tiger? Also, did B-25Hs have both AP and HE shells?

tedrbr · « **Reply #19 on:** April 10, 2007, 02:42:18 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by AquaShrimp
B-25H will be the scourge of GVers. Anyone have any data on whether a 75mm shell will penetrate the roof armor of a Tiger? Also, did B-25Hs have both AP and HE shells?

Ostie and M16 K/D numbers are going to go up in the future..... at least for a couple of weeks. LTARs gonna love the release of that patch.

AquaShrimp · « **Reply #20 on:** April 10, 2007, 02:46:43 AM »

B-25 vs Osties and M-16s, now that will be a nice match up.

Rino · « **Reply #21 on:** April 10, 2007, 07:46:06 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by AquaShrimp
B-25H will be the scourge of GVers. Anyone have any data on whether a 75mm shell will penetrate the roof armor of a Tiger? Also, did B-25Hs have both AP and HE shells?

Doubt very much that a howitzer would have AP rounds.

AquaShrimp · « **Reply #22 on:** April 10, 2007, 08:25:28 AM »

Found the data:

Armour penetration (M72 AP shell, 457 m, at 30 degrees): 76 mm

DREDger · « **Reply #23 on:** April 10, 2007, 09:24:45 PM »

Great book!!

I can be reached in my office, but only when I am not there.