Originally posted by DREDIOCK
Exactly my point.
Im not all that interested in older tests as they are outdated. Just as the older software is outdated.
After all. If I were to use it I would use the most recent verion. Not the older ones
It would only stand ot reason that a software company might make improvements
More recent tests show drastic improvements
Older tests are just that. Older
But if you spent enough time keeping an eye on the various products you'd know that one test does not give you a complete picture. A lot of products vary in their performance, some even get tweak to specifically give better test results. AVGs performance has not historically been stable or good. If it got 3 good results in a row in both types then I'd say yeah its good now.
It fails the retrospective test from Nov 2006 - and does poorly historically (new retrospective test is due shortly). All the current test shows is that they've got their signature file up to date.
Whereas a product like NOD32 does well without much variation in performance. AV is not like buying a snapshot product, it is a dynamic product. The vendors ability to keep up to date and to deal with unknown threats is important. AVG does not do well at this.