Why not add???

[Slash27]

Originally posted by devild0g
WRONG!!!! YOU KNOW HOW MUCH TECH IT TAKES TO SUPPORT ALL THIS WITHOUT MAJOR CRASHING????? Dont even start with all the bugs.... just imagine the noobs we got now please... you give them bombs... they will place em on runways and own your 262 when you spawn. This is a flight simulator. Until the future comes where computers can process that immense number of proportions, stats, and just basic physics, it will be chaos an unplayable game. The planes will go the way of the dinosaurs. But it would be different if hitech made a separate game which you could play on your aces high account. Now that would be very prosporous but never mix the two nope

Holy crap:huh

[Vulcan]

Originally posted by Slash27
Holy crap:huh

Looks like a case of WW2OL-itis with post-sapper-stress-syndrome to me.

[devild0g]

Dayaam was that me???

[Tango]

Sappers pretty much killed off the big tank battles in WW2OL. Don't need 'em in here.

[devild0g]

Dont play ww2ol i play socom 3, socom ca, battlefield 2142, cod2(3), and thats it ^_^ and i am imagining it means world war 2 online?

[Tango]

Nope, WW2OL WAS a pretty good game until the infantry guys started whinning and got the planes nerfed and sappers in game. They didn't even have the patience to make a 5 minute or less ride to the battle so they whined and got insta-spawn action put in game with mobile spawn points.

The infantry model in game is YEARS behind everything available now. However the tank and plane models are pretty good but the ground guys are the ones who the Rats listen to and the pilots have pretty much left and theres not nearly as many tankers as there used to be.

The game is barely making it now.

http://www.playnet.com/scripts/wwiionline/be_info.jsp

[devild0g]

Lol we are not ones 2 be talking rofl our infantry looks like it came out of the twilight zone

[5PointOh]

Originally posted by VERTEX
With all the recent changes in TT there have been a number of suggestions on how to fix it.

Heres my solution.

A soldier running around with sticky bombs. No need to model, a new Gv or anti tank gun.

Just sneak up behind a tank place bomb and run away. You would be small and hard to see. Just like its hard to see a bailed pilot vulching planes with his .45.

We seem to be heading in the direction of a more comprehensive WWII battle simulator as opposed to the WWII Flight Simulator I signed up for 5 years ago.

So why not create a 1st person shooter with ground soldiers, artillery, anti tank guns etc etc etc.

With the large number of players in TT it seems thats what people want anyway.

Does anyone else remember the good old days when GV's were here to support the aerial combat portion of the game. When the goal was to capture bases, and win the war.

I believe the game is still called ACES HIGH, or did I miss the change to TANKERS LOW.

How about an M8 in my disabled M4.  No hard feelings, ticked at first, but laughed later when I got your buddies on the hills in a 87  <> Vertex

[thndregg]

Originally posted by Slash27
Holy crap:huh

I know.

Sounds like King06's twin.

[Tango]

Originally posted by devild0g
Lol we are not ones 2 be talking rofl our infantry looks like it came out of the twilight zone

WW2OL's infantry model ISN'T much better than the one in here either. FAR from the infantry model that CoD, Red Orchestra, etc.

In here the Air War is the major theme for the game. In WW2OL, its supposed to be a combined actions game. The infantry model is severly hindering the game and they have never done anything about it. The planes and tanks model were pretty good.

The sad thing is instead of fixing the pathetic infantry model in game they hinder the rest of the game by nerfing it or putting in garbage [constant fog for the planes for example] that runs off the tankers and pilots.

[storch]

the last thing aces high needs is more ground game.

[Oldman731]

Originally posted by storch
the last thing aces high needs is more ground game.

Agreed.

- oldman

[Brenjen]

Originally posted by storch
the last thing aces high needs is more ground game.

 I love to play the ground but I have to agree; other than changing the stick figure infantry that all look like downed pilots into something that looks more like WWII army rangers that run instead of slide across the terrain like those old vibrating football games (anyone remember those? lol I loved mine).

 Minor cosmetic changes & increases in the vehicle set both in the air & on the ground would suffice in my opinion. None of us have the answers for what would make AHII "perfect", because what's perfect for you someone else thinks is the worst idea ever.

 Hitech....get busy inventing faster than light connections & then we can throw more super ideas your way

[ColKLink]

Heres my idea on tank town. Like anyone cares but here goes .Seeing it is clear that politics wont settle this dispute..... why not have a war over the whole dang island ??? If i remember correctly, that used to create a heckofa battle. Lets just go to war over tank town? (I wont be there but, this may be one area, a war might actually improve the situation.} that is a perfect senerio to start a war over i think. remember free advice is worth exactly what you paid for it,...................... nothing. As you were.

[VERTEX]

Originally posted by 5PointOh
How about an M8 in my disabled M4.  No hard feelings, ticked at first, but laughed later when I got your buddies on the hills in a 87  <> Vertex

5PointOh,

I'm glad you got a laugh out of that. I thought I'd try something different. Had been in TT for a couple of hours killing and dying, more dying I think.

Needed a diversion. Actually had a kill ratio better than most tank sorties.

Would like to know though, why can a jeep kill a tank from the inside but an m8 cant. Musta put a dozen rounds inside your turret, no boom.

Tried the same thing with the guy in the panzer who was beside you but he moved. Noticed he couldnt kill me while I was inside your m4.

Keep having fun.

VERTEX