Author Topic: Probably a good idea...  (Read 1007 times)

Offline Meatwad

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12895
Probably a good idea...
« Reply #15 on: May 06, 2007, 09:56:01 AM »
Sounds it would be just as bad or worse then being forced to hear Rush's daily talkshow
See Rule 19- Do not place sausage on pizza.
I am No-Sausage-On-Pizza-Wad.
Das Funkillah - I kill hangers, therefore I am a funkiller. Coming to a vulchfest near you.
You cant tie a loop around 400000 lbs of locomotive using a 2 foot rope - Drediock on fat women

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Probably a good idea...
« Reply #16 on: May 07, 2007, 08:32:41 AM »
being forced to listen to anything would be bad.

Or did you miss that point... maybe they glossed over that in your school.

lazs

Offline Sixpence

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5265
      • http://www.onpoi.net/ah/index.php
Probably a good idea...
« Reply #17 on: May 07, 2007, 08:54:00 AM »
We used to have a law that prevented owning all media, but it got pwned
"My grandaddy always told me, "There are three things that'll put a good man down: Losin' a good woman, eatin' bad possum, or eatin' good possum."" - Holden McGroin

(and I still say he wasn't trying to spell possum!)

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Probably a good idea...
« Reply #18 on: May 07, 2007, 08:59:57 AM »
If the old law meant that all I could listen too was network news and cnn..

the law deserved to be pawned.. and the pawn ticket thrown away.

lazs

Offline Sixpence

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5265
      • http://www.onpoi.net/ah/index.php
Probably a good idea...
« Reply #19 on: May 07, 2007, 09:08:25 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
If the old law meant that all I could listen too was network news and cnn..

the law deserved to be pawned.. and the pawn ticket thrown away.

lazs


No, it was to prevent one person from owning all media. Ok, you have four major TV networks in town, cbs, nbc, abc and fox, you couldn't own more than one. It was made to keep the media unbiased, you had many different sources of information.

As opposed to Rupert Murdoch or Ted Turner owning all four
"My grandaddy always told me, "There are three things that'll put a good man down: Losin' a good woman, eatin' bad possum, or eatin' good possum."" - Holden McGroin

(and I still say he wasn't trying to spell possum!)

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Probably a good idea...
« Reply #20 on: May 07, 2007, 02:36:00 PM »
they all seem to be touting the same liberal socialist line to me anyway so who cares who owns em?

the bill is simply a sour grapes thing from liberals because they can't compete in talk radio.    No one wants to listen to them so they want to force us to.

That is really all it is about...  the main ingredient is the "fairness doctrine"

A clean bill that limited the amount of market any one company could own would be fine.

I would like to see NPR not be the only tax subsidized radio station too... either stop funding it or fund a right wing station to balance it.   I much prefer the former.

lazs

Offline Sandman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17620
Probably a good idea...
« Reply #21 on: May 09, 2007, 12:04:03 AM »
If this hurts Clear Channel, I'm all for it.
sand

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Probably a good idea...
« Reply #22 on: May 09, 2007, 08:37:54 AM »
If censorship hurt clear channel you would be all for it?

lazs

Offline 68ROX

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 989
Probably a good idea...
« Reply #23 on: May 09, 2007, 09:44:09 AM »
Folks....mega-owners like Clear Channel ARE censorship.

I did radio for 23 years, mainly morning shows in Top 50 markets (Raleigh/Durham, Richmond, Milwaukee, etc.), and yes, I even worked for Clear Channel.

Have an idea, thought, side on an issue that THEY didn't agree with and find yourself without a job.  If you remotely knew what was going on behind those walls you would be shocked and dissapointed that so few could hold power over what so many hear in this country.

Before the early 1990's, listeners had Bressler's 33 flavors or quality radio programming.  You had to work hard and be talented to succeed and be rewarded with great ratings.

Now...automation, voice tracking, and the satallite dish deliver one flavor...VANILLA.

The mega-owners like Clear Channel, Cumulus, etc. gobbled up stations like a corporate Pacman and made hundreds of thousands of people
unemployed in the name of "consolodation".

Stations that were #1 with a 21 share 15 years ago struggle to get a 4 share in their target audience, and things are so bad that many general sales managers are selling based on VOLUME, not ratings.

GOOD LUCK if their is a tornado warning in your area and the EAS system fails to fire off, because no one is there to go on live and warn you that your backside is about to go airborne.

Radio on this country was built on the huge responsibility to "serve the public interest and necessity".

Radio, since federal deregulation, has only served to pad the bank accounts of millionaires who saw a loophole and a weekness in law and exploited it.

You get vanilla.

Offline lasersailor184

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8938
Probably a good idea...
« Reply #24 on: May 09, 2007, 09:49:25 AM »
I see your mouth moving, but all I'm hearing is this high pitched whining sound.
Punishr - N.D.M. Back in the air.
8.) Lasersailor 73 "Will lead the impending revolution from his keyboard"

Offline 68ROX

  • Parolee
  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 989
Probably a good idea...
« Reply #25 on: May 09, 2007, 10:06:45 AM »
I could care less about politics...I'm talking about QUALITY.

Do a little research.

Do a google search for "radio, 1970-1995, airchecks air checks" and listen for awhile.

Wolfman Jack, The Greaseman, Larry Lujack, Steve Dahl, Garry Meier, Johnathan Brandmeier....

Maybe you have been fed vanilla for so long you have no idea what Rocky Road is.

68ROX

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Probably a good idea...
« Reply #26 on: May 09, 2007, 02:32:42 PM »
If the stations were so great (and I am old enough to scratch my head over that) .....

Then how did clear channel gobble em all up?  

lazs

Offline Sandman

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 17620
Probably a good idea...
« Reply #27 on: May 09, 2007, 02:46:18 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by 68ROX
Folks....mega-owners like Clear Channel ARE censorship.


B I N G O
sand

Offline AKIron

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13363
Probably a good idea...
« Reply #28 on: May 09, 2007, 06:34:50 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Sandman
B I N G O


Censorship is the government dictating what can and can't be said in public, not a private organization choosing what to report.
Here we put salt on Margaritas, not sidewalks.

Offline lasersailor184

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8938
Probably a good idea...
« Reply #29 on: May 09, 2007, 06:59:06 PM »
HOW DARE YOU INTRODUCE LOGIC INTO THIS ARGUMENT!?!
Punishr - N.D.M. Back in the air.
8.) Lasersailor 73 "Will lead the impending revolution from his keyboard"