Author Topic: history freaks, aviation freaks, luftwaffle freaks check this out!  (Read 768 times)

Offline 1K3

  • Parolee
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3449


Hans Joachim Marseille (aka "The Star of Afrika"), a young German fighter pilot, was the most amazing, unique, and lethal ace of World War 2. A non-conformist and brilliant innovator, he developed his own personal training program and combat tactics, and achieved amazing results, including 17 victories in one day, and an average lethality ratio of just 15 gun rounds per victory. Marseille was described by Adolf Galland, the most senior German ace, with these words : "He was the unrivaled virtuoso among the fighter pilots of World War 2. His achievements were previously considered impossible."

http://www.youtube.com/view_play_list?p=E2C7365064B1FBA7

« Last Edit: May 05, 2007, 01:01:19 PM by 1K3 »

Offline Karnak

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 23046
history freaks, aviation freaks, luftwaffle freaks check this out!
« Reply #1 on: May 05, 2007, 01:11:48 PM »
As I recall, RAF records say it didn't happen.
Petals floating by,
      Drift through my woman's hand,
             As she remembers me-

Offline Viking

  • Personal Non Grata
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2867
history freaks, aviation freaks, luftwaffle freaks check this out!
« Reply #2 on: May 05, 2007, 04:05:18 PM »
Yes I also remember something about someone claiming RAF loss records didn't match the LW claims. I also remember that the person in question did not mention anything about the losses of the RCAF, RAAF, RNZAF, or SAAF, all of whom had squadrons serving in Africa at the time. The South African Air Force alone had a strength of 1,700 aircraft and more than 30,000 pilots in 1941 and operated in Egypt, Libya and Tunis. Saying that RAF records do not match LW claims means nothing; they weren’t the only force the LW was shooting at.

Offline Bruno

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1252
      • http://4jg53.org
history freaks, aviation freaks, luftwaffle freaks check this out!
« Reply #3 on: May 05, 2007, 05:29:32 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Karnak
As I recall, RAF records say it didn't happen.


they do match up - I suggest you pick up a copy of 'Fighters over the Desert' by Shores and Ring. Its not a cheap book or easy to come by but its the definitive work on this subject.

Quote
Marseille's first mission that day:

4 enemy fighters claimed shot down (at 0926, 0928, 0935, and 0938 hrs) with 80 cannon shells and 240 machine-gun rounds.

According to Shores/Ring, these were the pilots in the aircraft which Marseille claimed shot down:

Lt Bailey (1 SAAF sqn) force-landed his Hurricane

Maj Metelerkamp (1 SAAF sqn) was injured and had his Hurricane badly shot up

F/O Matthews (238 sqn) had his Hurricane shot down

P/O Bradley-Smith (601 sqn) had his Spitfire shot down.

Marseille's second mission that day:

8 enemy fighters ("P-40s") claimed shot down( at 1155, 1156, 1158, 1159, 1201, 1202, 1203, and 1205 hrs). In addition to Marseille's claims, Lt Remmer claimed one P-40 on the same mission.

According to Shores/Ring, six British fighters were shot down during an escort mission for bombers.

Marseille's third mission that day:

5 enemy fighters claimed shot down (at 1847, 1848, 1849, 1850, and 1853 hrs). In addition to Marseille's claims, four enemy fighters were claimed shot down by other German pilots on the same mission.

According to Shores/Ring, five Hurricanes of 213 sqn and one Hurricane of 208 sqn that were shot down approximately at the same time probably are identical with at least some of the German claims on that mission.

Shores and Ring list a number of additional Allied fighters lost in combat in Egypt on 1 September 1942 - although it has not been possible to verify the exact time (hour & minute):

Sgt. Sowerby, 3 RAAF sqn, was shot down

5 SAAF sqn had four of its fighters shot down

2 SAAF sqn and 64 U.S. sqn lost three P-40s on one mission

According to Shores/Ring, some of these (at least one of 5 SAAF sqn's losses) are among the six fighters which were shot down when they escorted bombers and - probably - were encountered by Marseille on his second mission on 1 September 1942.

Due to Shores/Ring, the official Allied losses in North Africa on 1 September 1942 amount to 22 aircraft (9 Hurricanes, 4 Kittyhawks, 4 Tomahawks, 2 Spitfires, 1 U.S. Warhawk, and 2 Beaufighters).


You can look at those claims by going to:

Tony Wood's Combat Claims & Casualties Lists

And downloading the Eastern Front Vol 2. Aug to Dec 1942 PDF and then search for Marseille's name.

However, what does it really matter if Marseille only got 14 that day or if his actual kill total was 120 rather then 158? His claims were filed based on good faith and not made-up.

Marseille was a good pilot but his success related directly to the his gunnery skills and the situation he faced in NA. Marseille basically preferred to fly alone. He would have his wingman stay out and away while he attacked alone. He claimed that in the desert with the clear skies and long range visibility that it was easier for a lone attacker to jump a large formation and cause havoc and confusion. He said that larger fromation were much more easily spotted then lone fighters. With hard maneuvering and fast close bursts of fire he was able to hit, kill and get away while the flight he attacked was thrown in panic.

He was less successful early on and it have been curious to see how he performed over WETO late in the war when JG27 was flying Reich defense.

A curious thing about JG27 in NA is they mostly went after fighters. Rarely did they go after bombers or low flying ground attack aircraft. This can be verified through their kill claims.

There were plenty of great pilots on all sides during the war. The LW and Axis lost, despite however "great" some of their pilots might have been..

If you look at LW pilots like Willi Reschke, he flew about 48 combat missions and was shot down 8 times.

Then compare that to some one like Adi Glunz, he flew a total of 574 missions, including 238 with enemy contact, in achieving 71 victories (with a possible 15 more unconfirmed) mostly flying in the west. He was never shot down or damaged in enemy combat.

Now there were folks in JG27 that out and out lied about their kills. One Schwarm of 4 was spotted firing their guns in the desert by a LW recce aircraft. They returned to base later and filed kill claims. Among this group was Franz Stigler. The group of 4 was broken up and sent to separate units.

But there are plenty of 'questionable' claims and stories that get told over and over again from all sides. We all know of Lowell...

For example, everyone has also heard about the June 26, 1943 event where Lt. Robert S. Johnson is bounced by FW-190s and is almost shot down and a FW-190s "escorts" him to the French coast after emptying his guns into the P-47..

In Roger Freeman's book on the 56th FG "Wolfpack Warriors" Freeman has a statement from Gerald Johnson where he claims that he shot the FW-190 from R.S. Johnson's tail and that his claim of being 'escorted' by the 190 was an exaggeration of what really happened.

Quote
From times and location Gerald Johnson was convinced that the FW190 he shot down was that which shot up his namesake's P-47. He heard Bob's story and said nothing, although he thought that in the excitement Bob had let his imagination run away with him concerning the chivalrous German pilot. No such incident was reported from the German side.


I can list many other from all sides as well. Marseille was a great pilot but he wasn't much of a wingman or 'team player'.
« Last Edit: May 05, 2007, 05:32:11 PM by Bruno »

Offline Guppy35

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 20385
history freaks, aviation freaks, luftwaffle freaks check this out!
« Reply #4 on: May 06, 2007, 01:43:38 AM »
So Bruno,

Any thoughts on Mersailles and the suggestion that he'd reached the point where he began to question the war prior to his death.  can't even recall where I read it, but it reminded me of the "Molder's Letter" mentioned in the Goebbels Diaries and the suspicions behind his death as well.

Is there a definitive biography of Mersailles?
Dan/CorkyJr
8th FS "Headhunters

Offline Xasthur

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2728
history freaks, aviation freaks, luftwaffle freaks check this out!
« Reply #5 on: May 06, 2007, 03:04:54 AM »
What was suspicious about his death?

I read that he was knocked out by vertical stabilizer as he tried to bail out of his 109 after a spontaneous engine fire.
Raw Prawns
Australia

"Beaufighter Operator Support Services"

Offline Brooke

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15470
      • http://www.electraforge.com/brooke/
history freaks, aviation freaks, luftwaffle freaks check this out!
« Reply #6 on: May 06, 2007, 03:27:06 AM »
One good book where the author researched kill totals and claims, including those by Marseille, correlating data from both sides of the conflict, is The Greatest Aces, by Edward Sims.  I liked that book.

What also might be interesting, but it looks like it is unavailable or hard to get, is The Fighter Pilots:  A Comparative Study of the Royal Air Force, the Luftwaffe and the United States Air Force in Europe and North Africa 1939 - 45, by Sims.

Offline Bruno

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1252
      • http://4jg53.org
history freaks, aviation freaks, luftwaffle freaks check this out!
« Reply #7 on: May 06, 2007, 07:39:31 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Guppy35
So Bruno,

Any thoughts on Mersailles and the suggestion that he'd reached the point where he began to question the war prior to his death.  can't even recall where I read it, but it reminded me of the "Molder's Letter" mentioned in the Goebbels Diaries and the suspicions behind his death as well.

Is there a definitive biography of Mersailles?


This theory AFAIK was first put forth in a comparison of Marseille and Von Richthofen. I am sure you have heard the theory behind the reason for Von Richthofen carelessness when he chased after May - it was speculated that Von Richthofen either had brain damage or was in such a state of despair that he didn't care if he was killed.

Much is made of Marseille's mental state following his fight with the expert Spitfire pilot. There's no doubt that, at least from those who witnessed, that Marseille was shaken by this fight. However, these same witnesses never mention that it had any impact on his aggressiveness as a fighter. He got right back in the air and into combat just like he had he prior. Exhaustion is something all the successful Luftwaffe pilots had to deal with - how well Marseille dealt I do not know.

His death was an accident, he wasn't just 'knocked out' by the impact with his aircraft, he was mangled. As I said above it would have been interesting to see how Marseille would have adapted in skies over Germany. The things that worked for him in the desert may not have worked over Germany. No more flying alone and slipping into the enemy fighters to cause havoc etc...

AFAIK there's no real definitive biography on Marseille - I do have Franz Kurowski's Marseille Biography (Schiffer). Kurowski is not a favorite and his source material is sometimes questionable (his Bridgehead Kurland is horrible). His Marseille book is 'ok' but more of a 'fluff' piece and not what I would refer to as 'objective'.

Offline Xasthur

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2728
history freaks, aviation freaks, luftwaffle freaks check this out!
« Reply #8 on: May 06, 2007, 09:20:51 AM »
I never understood why he bailed in such a way.

Given a non-combat situation, surely you would climb to stalling point, kill the engine (if it was not already dead by that point) and simply 'step-out of the aircraft'?

As I understood it, he rolled inverted going into a slow 'immelman' sort dive so that he could simply 'drop' out of the cockpit.

However, due to the increase in air speed due to the descent he was blown back into the tail, brutalised and as a result was unable to open his chute.

I seem to have read about so many great Luftwaffe pilots that died in stupid accients... Engine fires, test flying Lancasters after the war, railroad incidents after the war...

After all of the **** they survived day in and day out, to die in 'unforced' situations is...... well, I'd be pissed if I was them. Irony perhaps? Life's morbid sense of humor?
Raw Prawns
Australia

"Beaufighter Operator Support Services"

Offline Squire

  • Aces High CM Staff (Retired)
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 7683
history freaks, aviation freaks, luftwaffle freaks check this out!
« Reply #9 on: May 06, 2007, 09:48:59 AM »
*All sides over claimed. Period. Perfect intel isnt even possible in air combat in 2007.

*Von Richtofen was not brain damaged (he downed 20+ a/c after his 1917 head wound), its a silly story started by some neurosurgeons who wanted a few headlines. Like many aces, his luck just plain "ran out" on April 21st 1918.

*Marseilles was killed like many fighter pilots did in WW2, as a result of mechanical problems with his a/c. Conspiracy theories aside. Wartime flying was always a dangerous business, even without combat.

*As far as the 17 in a day score, I have not read anywhere where the total was disputed by records. In any case, the days tally was a good one, I see really no point in bickering over wether it was 10, 15, or 17, really. It was obviously a very good day for him?
« Last Edit: May 06, 2007, 09:53:49 AM by Squire »
Warloc
Friday Squad Ops CM Team
1841 Squadron Fleet Air Arm
Aces High since Tour 24

Offline Wilbus

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4472
history freaks, aviation freaks, luftwaffle freaks check this out!
« Reply #10 on: May 08, 2007, 10:47:46 AM »
Actually all Marseilles kill claims have been verified by "the other sides" records.

For those interested there is one truly excellent book about Marseille.

German Fighter Ace Hans-Joachim Marseille

Buy it, read it.
Rasmus "Wilbus" Mattsson

Liberating Livestock since 1998, recently returned from a 5 year Sheep-care training camp.

Offline Knegel

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 620
history freaks, aviation freaks, luftwaffle freaks check this out!
« Reply #11 on: May 08, 2007, 12:55:21 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Xasthur
I never understood why he bailed in such a way.

Given a non-combat situation, surely you would climb to stalling point, kill the engine (if it was not already dead by that point) and simply 'step-out of the aircraft'?

As I understood it, he rolled inverted going into a slow 'immelman' sort dive so that he could simply 'drop' out of the cockpit.

However, due to the increase in air speed due to the descent he was blown back into the tail, brutalised and as a result was unable to open his chute.

I seem to have read about so many great Luftwaffe pilots that died in stupid accients... Engine fires, test flying Lancasters after the war, railroad incidents after the war...

After all of the **** they survived day in and day out, to die in 'unforced' situations is...... well, I'd be pissed if I was them. Irony perhaps? Life's morbid sense of humor?


Hi,

a common way to to bail out was to trim the plane downward, roll it head over, then release the seat belts, then the plane move upward and the G forces suck you out of the plane.

Marsaille had bad smoke inside the cockpit for several minutes, its possible that he forgot to trim the plane down or he was already to slow, when the plane was head over and it felt already downward,  so there wasnt the needed G forces and so he crashed into the tail.
The smoke for sure did cause much stress(physically and psychical) and he probably wasnt able to see the horizon and so he didnt know his exact flightposition.

Greetings,

Knegel

Offline Bruno

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1252
      • http://4jg53.org
history freaks, aviation freaks, luftwaffle freaks check this out!
« Reply #12 on: May 08, 2007, 12:58:54 PM »
That's Franz Kurowski's book - unfortunately Kurowski doesn't write 'history'. Most of his works are 'fluff' pieces that repeat rumor with little in the way of confirming sources. He's not as bad a Caiden - who just made stuff up but never-the-less I would suggest reading Kurowski with some level of skepticism.