Author Topic: 1957 “Guns” magazine advertisements.  (Read 633 times)

Offline Mr No Name

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1835
1957 “Guns” magazine advertisements.
« Reply #15 on: May 13, 2007, 02:39:08 PM »
wow! i remember a department store had enfields in the very late 80s for $69
Vote R.E. Lee '24

Offline Xargos

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4281
1957 “Guns” magazine advertisements.
« Reply #16 on: May 13, 2007, 02:45:49 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by VOR
Cool ads. It's enough to make me cry, though. It makes me wonder what ads from 2007 will look like to enthusiasts in about 50 or 60 years.


In 50 or 60 years, pictures of guns will be treated worse then having child porn.  If your caught with a picture of a gun in the future you'll spend the rest of your life in prison.
Jeffery R."Xargos" Ward

"At least I have chicken." 
Member DFC

Offline VOR

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2313
1957 “Guns” magazine advertisements.
« Reply #17 on: May 13, 2007, 03:09:03 PM »
:rolleyes:

Offline Xargos

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4281
1957 “Guns” magazine advertisements.
« Reply #18 on: May 13, 2007, 03:17:14 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by VOR
:rolleyes:


:D
Jeffery R."Xargos" Ward

"At least I have chicken." 
Member DFC

Offline Charon

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3705
1957 “Guns” magazine advertisements.
« Reply #19 on: May 13, 2007, 06:48:20 PM »
What struck me was the price of the 9mm parabellum ammo in the Luger and P-38 ads. $9.50 for 100 rounds! There must not have been a lot floating around at the time. Using a "today's dollars" converter I found on the Internet that comes out to: $61.41 or about $30 per box of 50 compared to $9 per box today.

Highly collectable pieces like the Luger were still a good deal then by comparison, especially if all matching. The same applies to the K98k if all matching and even with a bolt mismatch. In fact, most I spot checked were not bad deals, though not typically GREAT deals.

http://www.1soft.com/todaysdollars.htm

Charon

Offline Halo

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3222
1957 “Guns” magazine advertisements.
« Reply #20 on: May 14, 2007, 10:00:06 AM »
Good posts about dollars then and now.  Hard to get accurate perspective about such comparisons.  Right after WWII it was a big deal to earn $100 a week or more than $5,000 a year.  

Even in the 1960s, I was appalled that some houses cost more than $15,000.  When we had to pay almost $19,000 for our first house, I was nearly in shock.
Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity. (Seneca, 1st century AD, et al)
Practice random acts of kindness and senseless beauty. (Anne Herbert, 1982, Sausalito, CA)
Paramedic to Perkaholics Anonymous

Offline Rino

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8495
1957 “Guns” magazine advertisements.
« Reply #21 on: May 14, 2007, 10:20:32 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Halo
Good posts about dollars then and now.  Hard to get accurate perspective about such comparisons.  Right after WWII it was a big deal to earn $100 a week or more than $5,000 a year.  

Even in the 1960s, I was appalled that some houses cost more than $15,000.  When we had to pay almost $19,000 for our first house, I was nearly in shock.


     Our 1966 $17K starter home in NJ sold for $324K in 2005..talk about
sticker shock :)
80th FS Headhunters
PHAN
Proud veteran of the Cola Wars

Offline Halo

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3222
1957 “Guns” magazine advertisements.
« Reply #22 on: May 14, 2007, 05:13:47 PM »
Yeah, the sad thing is that necessities seem designed to suck up every disposable piece of income each generation has, at least the so-called "average" wages.  

Yet the curve keeps rising, each goodie like HD TV becoming the latest minimum acceptable "necessity."  

Starting out, we were so envious of people who had paid-off mortgages and owned their own houses free and clear.  Made a huge difference in the monthly budget whether you had a mortgage payment, let alone usurious interest on credit cards.

Our house also has appreciated about tenfold since we bought it 35 years ago.  Catch is, unless moving to a lower cost of living area, selling it would not buy a comparable house because of ridiculous real estate agent commissions and general housing parasite costs.  

Reading the real estate advice columns in the newspaper is a good way to lose sleep if you have to sell or buy a house.  Don't see how the process could get much more confusing and complicated.  As others have mentioned, slavery is still alive and well in capitalism -- we just call it mortgages, or rent, or whatever it takes just to be able to earn a living.  

But nothing new about that.  Most societies throughout history require a lot of work just to survive.  

We'll probably stay in our house until we exit feet first.  The neighborhood has changed a lot but fortunately it's still a nice place to live.  

Oh yeah, the main thread topic, guns then and now.  Guns are probably one of the best investments and often also come with guarantees better than practically any other commodity.  

For example, I bought a Ruger .357 Single-Six used.  Was keyholing and having an ejection problem.  Ruger refurbished it, including new barrel, FREE with my only cost shipping to Ruger.  Let's see any other industry match that kind of lifetime warranty!
Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity. (Seneca, 1st century AD, et al)
Practice random acts of kindness and senseless beauty. (Anne Herbert, 1982, Sausalito, CA)
Paramedic to Perkaholics Anonymous

Offline loser

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1642
1957 “Guns” magazine advertisements.
« Reply #23 on: May 14, 2007, 07:03:33 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by lazs2
M3 grease guns... $49.00

Those were the days.. even in the 60's I was buying 7mm mausers for $20  ammos was sold by the pound.

You could buy a 20 mm semi auto lahti or other cannon for $75.00

Kids brought their rifles to school and the NRA taught gun saftey and the school bussed us to the range.

course with all the senseless school shootings by cannon and machine gun in the fifties and sixties....

That all had to change and now we have "gun free zones" where no one is ever shot.

lazs


Beautiful. :aok