Author Topic: durability and ruggedness  (Read 2010 times)

Offline Hats

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 23
durability and ruggedness
« on: May 27, 2007, 07:02:01 PM »
which fighter or attack plane do you believe has the best protection around pilot and engine/ability to keep on chuggin'?

here are my thoughts:

1st: the p-40e: best pilot protection, and i've never had my wings shot off, EVER. lossing flaps is a biggy, though.

2nd: F4U: its an armoured bathtub, but any rounds from behind can cut off your stabilzers like chips.

3rd: P-47: its a jug. pretty tough aircraft. all around hard to break.


and your thoughts?

Offline Yoshimbo

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 612
      • http://freewebs.com/yoshimbo/
durability and ruggedness
« Reply #1 on: May 27, 2007, 08:14:28 PM »
friggin jugs and TBMs seem to absorb the most damage in my experiances so far

Offline Blooz

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3845
durability and ruggedness
« Reply #2 on: May 27, 2007, 08:16:26 PM »
Il-2

in freakin destructible
White 9
JG11 Sonderstaffel

"The 'F' in 'communism' stands for food."

Offline Spikes

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15847
    • Twitch: Twitch Feed
durability and ruggedness
« Reply #3 on: May 27, 2007, 08:22:26 PM »
<---took 6 20mm shots to the nose in f6f...still lived...no damage
i7-12700k | Gigabyte Z690 GAMING X | 64GB G.Skill DDR4 | EVGA 1080ti FTW3 | H150i Capellix

FlyKommando.com

Offline SlapShot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9121
durability and ruggedness
« Reply #4 on: May 28, 2007, 04:35:12 PM »
F4F / F6F ... built by Grumman ... was often referred to as the "Grumman Iron Works."
SlapShot - Blue Knights

Guppy: "The only risk we take is the fight, and since no one really dies, the reward is the fight."

Offline Blooz

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3845
durability and ruggedness
« Reply #5 on: May 28, 2007, 05:07:12 PM »
IL-2 built by Ilyushin was often referred to as the "Flying Tank"
White 9
JG11 Sonderstaffel

"The 'F' in 'communism' stands for food."

Offline BaldEagl

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10791
durability and ruggedness
« Reply #6 on: May 28, 2007, 06:30:22 PM »
F4F/FM2.  They take a lickin' and keep on tickin'.
I edit a lot of my posts.  Get used to it.

Offline zorstorer

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 950
durability and ruggedness
« Reply #7 on: May 28, 2007, 06:54:18 PM »
You dont see them very much but the 190F8 can be tough one.

Offline Wes14

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2996
durability and ruggedness
« Reply #8 on: May 28, 2007, 06:55:49 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Blooz
IL-2 built by Ilyushin was often referred to as the "Flying Tank"


agreed they are freaking tough :aok
Warning! The above post may induce: nausea, confusion, headaches, explosive diarrhea, anger, vomiting, and whining. Also this post may not make any sense, or may lead to the hijack of the thread.

-Regards,
Wes14

Offline gripen

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1914
durability and ruggedness
« Reply #9 on: May 29, 2007, 03:01:42 AM »
There is couple cases in Finnish air force when an experienced pilot used all ammo of a three cannon Bf 109G against an Il-2 and the Il-2 just keep on flying despite big pieces were torn off. Very rugged bird; practically all vital areas were armored.

Offline bozon

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6037
durability and ruggedness
« Reply #10 on: May 29, 2007, 04:02:29 AM »
for single engine birds in AH, my vote goes to the IL2.
Mosquito VI - twice the spitfire, four times the ENY.

Click!>> "So, you want to fly the wooden wonder" - <<click!
the almost incomplete and not entirely inaccurate guide to the AH Mosquito.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RGOWswdzGQs

Offline Anyone

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 307
durability and ruggedness
« Reply #11 on: May 29, 2007, 04:24:05 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Blooz
IL-2 built by Ilyushin was often referred to as the "Flying Tank"


ive seen 7mm and 13mm rounds bounce off that thing..... no joke. :eek:

Offline DaddyAck

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 842
durability and ruggedness
« Reply #12 on: May 29, 2007, 05:06:46 AM »
190F8, tough nut to crack as far as 190s go. Though I would have to say that the IL2 is freakin' redicules in the ammount of ammo it takes to kill it. The Gruman F4F anf F6F are really rugged too, I fly the F4F alot and it does well.

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
durability and ruggedness
« Reply #13 on: May 29, 2007, 06:55:29 AM »
IL2 (allround) followed by 190A8 (frontal armor anyway). The F8 seems to be able to take alot of punishment in the belly.

In real life the jug was supposed to take a great deal of punishment but it seems fragile in here.

Offline Patches1

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 668
durability and ruggedness
« Reply #14 on: May 29, 2007, 08:57:52 AM »
The IL-2s' tail is very weak. The rest of the aircraft is a titanium bathtub.
"We're surrounded. That simplifies the problem."- Lewis B. "Chesty" Puller, General, USMC