Author Topic: Hawker Nimrod  (Read 712 times)

Offline TwinBoom

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2960
      • 39th FS "Cobra In The Clouds"
Hawker Nimrod
« on: May 28, 2007, 09:55:01 AM »
A brief clip of a rare Rolls Royce Kestrel engined Hawker Nimrod filmed at Duxford in May 07
Nimrod
TBs Sounds 
39th FS "Cobra In The Clouds"NOSEART

Offline Furball

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15781
Hawker Nimrod
« Reply #1 on: May 28, 2007, 10:00:40 AM »
The Nimrod/Fury are beautiful aircraft, especially in 30's markings with the colourful squadron markings.

You can really see similarity to the Hurricane.

I am not ashamed to confess that I am ignorant of what I do not know.
-Cicero

-- The Blue Knights --

Offline TwinBoom

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2960
      • 39th FS "Cobra In The Clouds"
Hawker Nimrod
« Reply #2 on: May 28, 2007, 10:05:55 AM »
yes very close
TBs Sounds 
39th FS "Cobra In The Clouds"NOSEART

Offline Airscrew

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4808
Hawker Nimrod
« Reply #3 on: May 29, 2007, 02:44:46 PM »
I'm thinking I read somewhere that the original protype for the Hurricane was a biplane.  When the specifications called for monoplane then Hawker reworked it

Offline B3YT

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 893
Hawker Nimrod
« Reply #4 on: May 29, 2007, 03:42:26 PM »
nope hurri was always a monoplane. hawker produced the first brit monoplane during WWI . It was always designed as a monplaned fighter with 8 guns
As the cleaners say :"once more unto the bleach"

Offline Warspawn

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 647
Hawker Nimrod
« Reply #5 on: May 29, 2007, 03:50:40 PM »
Neat!

I was watching the history channel this weekend and they were discussing the Hurricane designer's VTOL aircraft.  He won a huge competition for a Mach 2 VTOL plane, but the UK squashed it with budget cuts after it began..

They did however, allow the development of a smaller, less expensive aircraft.  That is of course, the ever-popular Harrier!
Purple haze all in my brain
Lately things just don't seem the same
Actin' funny, but I don't know why

'Scuse me while I kiss the sky                 
                                                 --J. Hendrix

Offline B3YT

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 893
Hawker Nimrod
« Reply #6 on: May 29, 2007, 04:02:49 PM »
yeah the TSR2 was also dropped during that cut. man how cool that bomber was. Mach 2 , super manoverable , HUGE payload and terrain following radar (acka the Torbado GR.1 ) so low level vally runs are safe :)

 In fact the USNAF use a hawker design ; the Gosh hawk is a hawker
(now BAC ) hawk trainner ( light fighter ground support )
As the cleaners say :"once more unto the bleach"

Offline Furball

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15781
Hawker Nimrod
« Reply #7 on: May 29, 2007, 05:24:30 PM »
Sir Sidney Camm is possibly the greatest aircraft designer that ever lived.  He even had some input on what became the Panavia Tornado.

The Hurricane was originally named the Fury Monoplane in a very early stage of development.

http://www.nasm.si.edu/research/aero/aircraft/hawker_mkiic.htm
I am not ashamed to confess that I am ignorant of what I do not know.
-Cicero

-- The Blue Knights --

Offline Furball

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15781
Hawker Nimrod
« Reply #8 on: May 29, 2007, 05:27:00 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by B3YT
nope hurri was always a monoplane. hawker produced the first brit monoplane during WWI . It was always designed as a monplaned fighter with 8 guns


That is not true, Hawker were not about then and Britain had produced monoplanes before the first world war.  They were deemed inferior to biplanes so were not used.  One of the best designs of the first world war was the Bristol M1C which was doing ~130+ mph in 1915/16.  Pretty much the fastest thing in the air at that time, but the bias against monoplanes kept it out of service in any significant numbers.



« Last Edit: May 29, 2007, 05:31:33 PM by Furball »
I am not ashamed to confess that I am ignorant of what I do not know.
-Cicero

-- The Blue Knights --

Offline rogerdee

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2286
      • http://rogerdee.co.uk
Hawker Nimrod
« Reply #9 on: May 30, 2007, 12:10:20 PM »
furball your proberly right but what about barns wallice,he was also a great aircraft designer and did a lot of other great designs for other things.
490th battling bulldogs
www.rogerdee.co.uk

it does what it says on the tin

Offline B3YT

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 893
Hawker Nimrod
« Reply #10 on: May 30, 2007, 12:57:04 PM »
hmm i thought that hawker was a subsitutary of bristol during WWI . But i'm probly wrong
As the cleaners say :"once more unto the bleach"

Offline Furball

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15781
Hawker Nimrod
« Reply #11 on: May 30, 2007, 01:02:24 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by rogerdee
furball your proberly right but what about barns wallice,he was also a great aircraft designer and did a lot of other great designs for other things.


He wasnt really an aircraft designer on the scale of Camm.  He was more of a genius who came up with solutions to existing problems (geodetic structure on the Wellington for strength, Tallboy bomb to finally sink the Tirpitz, Bouncing bomb to defeat the dams).

Quote
Originally posted by B3YT
hmm i thought that hawker was a subsitutary of bristol during WWI . But i'm probly wrong


IIRC Hawker was formed from Sopwith, then later became Hawker Siddely, then British Aerospace.
I am not ashamed to confess that I am ignorant of what I do not know.
-Cicero

-- The Blue Knights --

Offline KG45

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 435
Hawker Nimrod
« Reply #12 on: May 30, 2007, 06:03:10 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Furball
Sir Sidney Camm is possibly the greatest aircraft designer that ever lived.  
[


everybody know Kurt Tank is the greatest designer of all time.

he even designed Chuck Norris. :)
all you fascists, you're bound to lose...

Offline Angus

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10057
Hawker Nimrod
« Reply #13 on: June 01, 2007, 10:19:26 AM »
It would also have been nice to see what Mitchell would have come up with, had he lived....
It was very interesting to carry out the flight trials at Rechlin with the Spitfire and the Hurricane. Both types are very simple to fly compared to our aircraft, and childishly easy to take-off and land. (Werner Mölders)

Offline Puck

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2980
Hawker Nimrod
« Reply #14 on: June 01, 2007, 11:31:45 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by KG45
everybody know Kurt Tank is the greatest designer of all time.

he even designed Chuck Norris. :)


Oh, PLEASE!  Go check your references.  Kelly Johnson designed Chuck Norris.

:cool:
//c coad  c coad run  run coad run
main (){char _[]={"S~||(iuv{nkx%K9Y$hzhhd\x0c"},__
,___=1;for(__=___>>___;__<((___<<___<<___<<___<<___
)+(___<<___<<___<<___)-___);__+=___)putchar((_[__
])+(__/((___<<___)+___))-((___&