Originally posted by Hornet33
OK those are fighting words. Tom Clancy is awsome. By far one of the best military/fiction/espionage writers in the last 20 years. Almost all of his books have been best sellers. He has a gift for mixing real world politics and technology into a fictional story with characters that are interesting and yet down to earth.
I can only surmise from your statement you've never actually read any of his work. You saw the movies though huh? Those sucked and didn't do the novels they were based on any justice at all.
I've read quite a bit of Clancy...
Hunt for Red October
Red Storm Rising
Patriot Games
Cardinal of the Kremlin
Clear and Present Danger
Sum of All Fears
Without Remorse
Debt of Honor
Executive Decisions
Clancy's books are plodding and tedious... and if the boredom wasn't enough to toss the books away, the endless pontification that seems to have infected everything he wrote after Cardinal of the Kremlin pushes them right over.
From the start, his juggling of four or more story arcs has been a source of irritation. With HFRO, I didn't notice so much because each story arc was interesting, but with each book, Clancy seems to fill more and more of his books with crap you have slog through while waiting for the "good" parts.
FWIW... I think HFRO and PG were the most enjoyable.
After COTK, it's all crap.
Anyway... back on topic... if it's jhookt's goal to become "well read," I think he should avoid Clancy like the plague. Same goes for Stephen King.