dadano.. I listened to that guys whole speil and I came to a different conclusion.. the way he laid it out.. the risk of acting on man made climate change was worse in every way than taking a chance on not acting.
The only happy outcome was if we did nothing that we admited that it was a hoax and that it was. All the other boxes under acting involved cost and growing the government and losing freedom. You don't get those things back.
What the guy is saying is that any threat that the government or scientists come up with is worth doing whatever they say needs to be done to "fix" it... even if that means extorting money in taxes and more regulation and loss of freedom..
Very scary.. you could do the same boxes with a comet or meteorite shield needed or some new disease like the dreaded bird flu that killed the hundreds of millions of people last year as predicted...
Arent thos things worth "doing something" about? aren't they worth cost and regulation and a little bit more government in your life?
You want to be safe don't you?
lazs
