Author Topic: A-31 Vulltee Vengence  (Read 1179 times)

Offline Bosco123

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3604
A-31 Vulltee Vengence
« on: June 16, 2007, 12:50:24 PM »
How about a vultee Vengence it was made by the company Vulltee and then sold out by Northdrop. there were 1500 made but called the Vulltee useccesful but still saw action in the Burma theater also squad based





Skifurd AKA "Bosco"
Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) Operator
United States Marine
"Stay ahead of the game, Stay ahead of the plane."

Offline Furball

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15781
A-31 Vulltee Vengence
« Reply #1 on: June 16, 2007, 12:57:12 PM »
YES! :aok
I am not ashamed to confess that I am ignorant of what I do not know.
-Cicero

-- The Blue Knights --

Offline Bosco123

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3604
A-31 Vulltee Vengence
« Reply #2 on: June 16, 2007, 01:02:36 PM »
we nee some RAF bombers other than the lancaster and that can fly off a carrier
Skifurd AKA "Bosco"
Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) Operator
United States Marine
"Stay ahead of the game, Stay ahead of the plane."

Offline bomberhead22

  • Zinc Member
  • *
  • Posts: 26
A-31 Vulltee Vengence
« Reply #3 on: June 16, 2007, 01:11:38 PM »
i like :aok

Offline tedrbr

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1813
A-31 Vulltee Vengence
« Reply #4 on: June 16, 2007, 01:13:53 PM »
JUDY!  JUDY!  JUDY!

Offline Dantoo

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 970
      • http://www.9giap.com
A-31 Vulltee Vengence
« Reply #5 on: June 17, 2007, 05:39:08 PM »
Nearly 350 of these were operated by the RAAF
Cut and Pasted from Australian War Museum:

A27 Vultee Vengeance

The Vultee V72 dive-bomber was produced at a time when the German Air Force was having marked success with the Junkers Ju-87, or Stuka, dive-bomber. The American aircraft was first flown in July 1941, and large quantities were immediately ordered, as the Vengeance, for the RAF. When the US entered the war, a number of these aircraft were re-possessed and, in addition, Australia placed an order for 400. Export versions included Vengeance Mks I, II, and III (USAAF equivalent A-3l) and Mk IV (USAAF equivalent A-35).

In all, 342 Vengeance Mks I, II and IV operated with the RAAF under the following serials: A27-1 to A27-99, A27-200 to A27-321, A27-400 to A27-422, A27-500 to A27-549, A27-560 to A27-566 and A27-600 to A27-640. Although the first Vengeance A27-1 was received on 30 May 1942, substantial numbers did not arrive until April 1943, by which time the crisis for which they had been ordered, had passed.

RAAF Vengeances operated with Nos 12, 21, 23, 24 and 25 Squadrons and, after a somewhat indifferent career, the aircraft were withdrawn from operations following a bombing raid by 36 Vengeances on 8 March 1944 against Rempi village. At the time, 58 Vengeances were still to be delivered and, consequently, this balance from the original order was cancelled. Vengeances also operated with Nos 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 Communication Units, while others were used in the target-towing role and for experiments at No 1 Air Performance Unit.

Vengeance flying ceased in 1946, and all aircraft were disposed of by 1951.
TECHNICAL DATA: Vultee Vengeance Mk IV (A-35B)
DESCRIPTION:

Two-seat dive-bomber. All metal stressed-skin construction.
POWER PLANT:

One 1,700 hp Wright Double Row Cyclone radial.
DIMENSIONS:

Span 14.63 (48 ft); length 12.11 m (40 ft); height 4.63 (15 ft 4 in).
WEIGHTS:

Empty 4672 kg (10,300 lb); loaded 7439 kg (16,400 lb).
PERFORMANCE:

Max speed 449 km/h (242 kt); Cruising speed 370 km/h (200kt); Service ceiling 22,300 ft (6796 m); Range 965 km (521 nm).
ARMAMENT:

Four 0.303 or 0.50 machine guns in wing, and twin 0.303 or 0.50 machine guns in rear cockpit; Bomb load 907 kg (2,000 lb)
I get really really tired of selective realism disguised as a desire to make bombers easier to kill.

HiTech

Matthew 24:28 For wherever the carcass is, there is where the vultures gather together.

Offline Bosco123

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3604
A-31 Vulltee Vengence
« Reply #6 on: June 17, 2007, 05:56:05 PM »
thank for telling us the story Danatoo
Skifurd AKA "Bosco"
Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) Operator
United States Marine
"Stay ahead of the game, Stay ahead of the plane."

Offline Spikes

  • Aces High CM Staff
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15853
    • Twitch: Twitch Feed
A-31 Vulltee Vengence
« Reply #7 on: June 17, 2007, 07:44:13 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by tedrbr
JUDY!  JUDY!  JUDY!


lol...takin over Sik's line...
i7-12700k | Gigabyte Z690 GAMING X | 64GB G.Skill DDR4 | EVGA 1080ti FTW3 | H150i Capellix

FlyKommando.com

Offline Shifty

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9377
      • 307th FS
A-31 Vulltee Vengence
« Reply #8 on: June 18, 2007, 10:27:29 AM »
YES!:aok






Just wish it was that simple.:(

JG-11"Black Hearts"...nur die Stolzen, nur die Starken

"Haji may have blown my legs off but I'm still a stud"~ SPC Thomas Vandeventer Delta1/5 1st CAV

Offline Bosco123

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3604
A-31 Vulltee Vengence
« Reply #9 on: June 18, 2007, 11:38:49 AM »
i hope it goes on
Skifurd AKA "Bosco"
Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) Operator
United States Marine
"Stay ahead of the game, Stay ahead of the plane."

Offline whiteman

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4229
A-31 Vulltee Vengence
« Reply #10 on: June 19, 2007, 06:43:54 PM »
looked over this one and would be nice to have more british representation on the CV. :aok

Offline Furball

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 15781
A-31 Vulltee Vengence
« Reply #11 on: June 20, 2007, 03:00:19 AM »
Bored of fishing now, the Vengence was a POS, i don't know if they were ever even used on the carriers.  Most of them were target tugs if i recall.

If you want a divebomber for the Fleet Air Arm the Fairey Barracuda would be far more suitable.

If you want a powerful CV attack aircraft, look no further than the Fairey Firefly.
I am not ashamed to confess that I am ignorant of what I do not know.
-Cicero

-- The Blue Knights --

Offline KD303

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 201
A-31 Vulltee Vengence
« Reply #12 on: June 20, 2007, 03:56:18 AM »
Absolutely!
Ever wonder why you never hear about certain aircraft? Could it be because they're a load of piddle?
Something by Fairey would indeed be much better. Even the Swordfish.;) Even the flippin' Blackburn Skua or Roc!

This must tell you something:
Vultee A-31 Vengeance - Battle honours: None with FAA

It was a 1930s job. Obsolete by the time it reached the Fleet Air Arm. The Royal Navy didn't get them 'till late 44 (making it a erm...late war aircraft, cough, cough). Anyway, what advantages does it have over any of the existing American carrier planes in AH (Avenger, for example)? 6 X .50s forward firing? When would you bring them to bear?
None saw front line service with Fleet Air Arm carriers anyway.
I'm sure there are better aircraft, more deserving of our attentions for use on carriers.(I know the OP didn't mention carriers, but what else could he have meant?)

No, if you want a new aircraft for carrier operations, surely the Fairey Firefly is a true contender.

4 X 20mm Hispanos
8 x 60lb rockets or 2000lbs bombs or other goodies
RR Griffon (yum, yum - gotta love the growl)

A lot faster than the Vengeance too.

As long as you forget the "fighter" tag and use it in the offensive attack role, I reckon it would be a goodun.
« Last Edit: June 20, 2007, 04:50:39 AM by KD303 »