Author Topic: Motorcycle touring vs. cruising  (Read 1603 times)

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6864
Motorcycle touring vs. cruising
« Reply #15 on: July 01, 2007, 08:04:06 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Chairboy
Try the Beamer, I bet you'll like it.  Almost impossible to beat for touring/cruising.  Goldwings are also popular, but it's basically a two wheeled car.
If he doesn't fit on a softtail he sure won't fit on a BMW unless he puts at least 6" 'lifts' on his boots.

Offline Chairboy

  • Probation
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8221
      • hallert.net
Motorcycle touring vs. cruising
« Reply #16 on: July 01, 2007, 08:12:08 PM »
I have a 5'5 friend who does great on those bikes, there's adjustments that can be made to both the suspension and the rider's confidence.  :D
"When fascism comes to America it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross." - Sinclair Lewis

Offline Maverick

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13922
Motorcycle touring vs. cruising
« Reply #17 on: July 01, 2007, 08:28:34 PM »
Blacksheep,

I am currently riding an R1150RT. It's my 4th beemer since I first got one in 76. I have driven across the country on them from coast to coast. As much as I like them and depend on them, the lack of a dealer can be an issue if you need work or parts. If you have a local dealership, by all means get the beemer. If you don't have one nearby, try looking at the Kawasaki Concours. It's an excellent touring bike and pretty affordable. The ergonomics are close to the beemer so it will be comfortable on a long drive.

If you plan on driving any distance in a day I definitely wouldn't count on the Harley. It won't be comfortable to do that kind of driving unless you are getting something like a glide. The glide is comfortable but won't corner worth a darn and is heavy.

If you have questions about beemers, let me know. I've driven and owned the old airheads, kbike and now an oil head.
DEFINITION OF A VETERAN
A Veteran - whether active duty, retired, national guard or reserve - is someone who, at one point in their life, wrote a check made payable to "The United States of America", for an amount of "up to and including my life."
Author Unknown

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6864
Motorcycle touring vs. cruising
« Reply #18 on: July 01, 2007, 08:30:26 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Chairboy
I have a 5'5 friend who does great on those bikes, there's adjustments that can be made to both the suspension and the rider's confidence.  :D

Blacksheep: "Softtails are too big for my height and weight

A softtail has a seat height much lower than the BMW.

R1200RT - Seat height    32.2

FXST - Seat height 25"

So how is going to fit on a BMW that has a seat height 7" more?

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6864
Motorcycle touring vs. cruising
« Reply #19 on: July 01, 2007, 08:37:38 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Maverick
If you plan on driving any distance in a day I definitely wouldn't count on the Harley. It won't be comfortable to do that kind of driving unless you are getting something like a glide. The glide is comfortable but won't corner worth a darn and is heavy.
Beg to differ as I put 12,000mi on a cross country trip in 6 weeks and never found the ST uncomfortable, even without a windshield.

Offline hyena426

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1756
Motorcycle touring vs. cruising
« Reply #20 on: July 01, 2007, 08:46:42 PM »
Quote
Do you wanna have a real motorbike or to have a '1%' wanna-be late pube rebel over hyped&priced well marketed "American quality & iron bike"?
 so much hype that all the jap bikes have been tring to copy them for 20 years and still dont sell for half the price..harley did it the smart way..they didnt change there motor every year..and you can still get parts for 1930 harleys up till now...try to do that on a old honda cb or yamaha or any bike for that matter..good luck..they change there bikes every year..so you wont see many old honda's rolling around too much ...more old harleys on the road then any other bike in the world and they sell for more..just cause they dont change...nothing wrong with a harley at all..i like all bikes thou.. i think the only down fall for jap bikes is there constantly changing there designs from year to year. so when a bike is old and out of date they just stop making new parts for them. so a  bike you grew up with and liked alot but dont like the newer style. tuff titty. your stuck cause of lack of parts for older models.

everyone allways knocks harley's around..but there #1..and for good reason..there cool and make alot of noise..kinda like muscle cars:) sure they break down and have issues. but when you pull in a gas station in a old mach 1. they croud around and ask you how much? its about attention somtimes. not just dependible or confy.lol if you dont want that..get a spree or a goldwing. good gas saver and a good cruzer.

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6864
Motorcycle touring vs. cruising
« Reply #21 on: July 01, 2007, 08:57:58 PM »
One thing to remember is if you lay the BMW down it is expensive to fix with those cylinderheads sticking out the side.

Offline Black Sheep

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 543
      • http://www.myspace.com/empire21productions
Motorcycle touring vs. cruising
« Reply #22 on: July 01, 2007, 09:07:35 PM »
Milo -

It has more to do with it than just the height - i just dont sit well on it - it doesn't feel comfortable.

Maverick -

There is a Beamer Cycle dealership that services in Nashville. And there are a few for sale on Craigslist - I'm in no hurry, so I may try these bikes out again if I can.

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6864
Motorcycle touring vs. cruising
« Reply #23 on: July 01, 2007, 09:13:43 PM »
Black Sheep, maybe you posted it but what is your height and weight?

Offline bj229r

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6732
Motorcycle touring vs. cruising
« Reply #24 on: July 01, 2007, 09:21:27 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Cougar68
Just to add, I had a Shadow ACE for a while.  I used to poke at the Harley guys and tell them the biggest difference between their cruiser and mine was that when I hit the starter, mine actually would run.  :D


Umm..it's not 1975 any more, Harleys have EVERYthing rubber mounted, and in prolly 5 years, Honda will make nada to fix your bike, whereas there isnt anything I can't get for my 1962 FL (save 9 seconds in the quarter mile:rolleyes: )
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers

http://www.flamewarriors.net/forum/

Offline Maverick

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13922
Motorcycle touring vs. cruising
« Reply #25 on: July 01, 2007, 09:40:08 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by MiloMorai
One thing to remember is if you lay the BMW down it is expensive to fix with those cylinderheads sticking out the side.


First the idea is to not lay the bike down. You can't avoid a collision by hitting the ground. At that point you become a projectile and do not have control over where you go.

That's where the ABS brake system comes in real handy along with a decent maneuverability.

Any hard collision with the ground will screw up any bike. The beemers are pretty stout in the cylinder area. Replacing the valve cover is pretty easy. If you want them you can get engine guards for them same as you can for other bikes. My first beemer was down twice with no real damage other than a scarred up valve cover.
DEFINITION OF A VETERAN
A Veteran - whether active duty, retired, national guard or reserve - is someone who, at one point in their life, wrote a check made payable to "The United States of America", for an amount of "up to and including my life."
Author Unknown

Offline bj229r

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6732
Motorcycle touring vs. cruising
« Reply #26 on: July 01, 2007, 09:52:03 PM »
I'd imagine vast majority of folks never come close to  layin bike down...dropped mine in yard more than once (ONCE in front of a bar, was frightfully embarrassing, until they were satisfied that I HAD actually put my foot down in puddle of oil:)
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers

http://www.flamewarriors.net/forum/

Offline Black Sheep

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 543
      • http://www.myspace.com/empire21productions
Motorcycle touring vs. cruising
« Reply #27 on: July 01, 2007, 09:54:30 PM »
I am 5' 9", 165lbs. - I am relatively new to street bikes and did not feel comfortable on the 1200 Harleys for some reason. The 883 was fine, although I had to lean forward alot to compensate for the power. I am not looking for the fastest bike, as I will probably never hit 100mph+ on one. Comfort, stability and safety are my main concerns. It seems that maybe the ride height on the BMW that I rode briefly might have been lowered to accomodate my friend. He never said so, so I will ask him that. It was an older 1100, and they only make 1200 now.

Offline tedrbr

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1813
Re: Motorcycle touring vs. cruising
« Reply #28 on: July 01, 2007, 11:42:47 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Black Sheep
I'm torn as to which direction to go. I guess it depends on how much I'm gonna be riding - I bought a Rebel 250 with a few mods to see if I was gonna stick with it. So I am going to get something larger and more comfortable for longer excursions and less vibrations. I'm not getting into anything new - but I am leaning towards either a used Harley 883 or a BMW R1100. Or split the difference and get a Ducati Monster. All have pros and cons. I can go longer distance with the BMW and still feel my butt afterwards. Harley is a Harley. Loud and a head turner. All have touring field trips. Just want to see what kind of bikes people on here are riding.


What exactly do you want to do with it?

If you want to ride the poker runs, want to ride an American-made bike, play dress up with bar and shield, do local group rides, ride bar to bar, and cruise locally more than anything; then a cruiser if probably the way to go.  Cruisers are more laid-back in their riding, and more about the image.  Many cruisers can still be set up for light-duty touring.  T-Bags and luggage rack, saddle bags, hard bags and front fairing.  It can be done.  Lockable Hard bags and a good front fairing is better than soft luggage and bolt on fairings, IMHO, if touring is the goal:  think HD Road King, Road Glide and Street Glide; Victory Kingpin Tourer; Honda Valkyrie Tourer; Kawasaki Nomad.

If you want to travel long distance, like to canyon carve (not necessarily fast), have the ability to haul along some gear (camping, clothes, whatever), then you might want to lean toward a sport-touring rig.   I suggest a nekkid street bike with good front fairing or larger windscreen replacement than a full faired sport bike set up for touring:  more comfortable seating arrangement, easier to work on, and usually cheaper insurance (less plastic).  A Bandit instead of a Katana for example.
A good nekkid street bike with lockable side bags, a small fairing, decent windscreen, and enough power output to use for charging and powering things like cell phones, heated vests, heated handgrips (heated grips can make a real difference in cold weather riding), iPod or radio, radar detector, extra lights.... whatever works for you.  Can be used well as a commuter, touring bike, and sporty canyon carving on the weekends.  

Ducati, BMW, Triumph, Moto Guzzi.... best if you have a good dealer around you or are very comfortable in doing your own work.  Also, generally not cheap to buy and maintain compared to Japanese bikes.

Harley will probably run more for insurance cc for cc to other bikes.  Hogs get stolen a lot for parts and joyrides, so rates are higher.

Things to consider:
Fuel Injected is better than Carburated for most purposes.  Shaft and Belt drive both better and easier (and cleaner) than Chain.  If new to riding, staying under 1000CC and away from fully faired bikes usually means lower insurance.  Get above 500 or 600cc to have a decent rig that can carry a load, and you won't outgrow it easily.  Something in the 750 to 900 cc range if insurance is a concern.  Get the MECHANIC'S manual for whatever bike you get, and subscribe to any Owner's Groups for that bike on the web to find out all the little things about it.  
Also, changing the handlebars: full bar swap, clips, heli bars or bar risers, can make a BIG difference in your riding posture:  I've owned six bikes in 20 years, and EVERY ONE OF THEM, I've changed the bars to bring them up a little and a little further back toward me.  


Additionally is riding gear.  
If touring is the goal, a full face helmet with a flip-up chin-bar (these are very convenient at times), good waterproof riding boots, both waterproof and light duty gloves, and textile riding jacket and pants (with zippered vents and jacket liner, and armored padding) makes for a good travel suit.  Most textile riding gear is waterproof - no need to carry additional rain gear, and well vented jackets and pants are a godsend in hot weather while on the road.
This is not the kind of gear you find most cruiser riders using: ie... leather, denim, and beanie helmet, if any helmet at all.  


Me currently:
2005 Victory Hammer (the other American motorcycle manufacturer) -  Toxic Green, Corbin saddle for two-up riding, Stage-1, Willie and Max pillon bag to carry stuff around (doubles as backrest).  Fun ride for around town and shorter trips.  Local riding, usually just a t-shirt for me.

2003 Honda ST1300 sold a little while ago.  Top truck, radio, iPod, heated handgrips.  Long distance touring rig and sport ride.  For LONG distance riding, there is nothing like a sport tourer with a power adjustable windscreen, music, and heated handgrips for comfort in bad weather conditions.   --- seriously thinking of getting Kawasaki K-14 Concours next summer as it's replacement.   Still have the full riding gear I used all the time with the ST, I rode it pretty aggressively; so armored riding gear and helmet.  

Before the ST, I had a 2000 Suzuki 600 Bandit I set up for sport-touring.  Hard bags, luggage rack, top box, had a river duffle bag (waterproof kayak bag) for the back seat (doubled as backrest).  Power for electric vest, heated handgrips, a Zero-G Double Bubble windscreen, fork brace, fog-lights.  That bike saw 10,000 miles a year for the four years I ran it, most on multi-day trips.
« Last Edit: July 01, 2007, 11:50:46 PM by tedrbr »

Offline hyena426

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1756
Motorcycle touring vs. cruising
« Reply #29 on: July 01, 2007, 11:54:23 PM »
yup,,get whatever makes you happy:) i like them all a little too much..for a mid sized bike i been really lookin at those new royal enfields that look just like the old ones..think there made in inda with original enfield cast.. i been thinking of getting the one with the sidecar cause they only run about 4,000 for a slightly used one...plus i love how there allmost like the orignals...i like the old snorting nortons too..old bsa lightings...i kinda stuck on the older style bikes...dont care much for the doggie style rockets my self..but i have rode a few..fast..just not my style..lol


http://cgi.ebay.com/ROYAL-ENFIELD-500-Red-cherry-color-AUSTRALIA_W0QQitemZ150138019809QQihZ005QQcategoryZ102690QQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem  <~~this one in aussie for 2800..but its a original...but i seen them in usa for about 1000 to 3000..i would like to have one just for runing around back roads..i wouldnt want one for long distance..lol

i like the james bond bmw.. cool bike..and i like the bmw cross country bike with the offroad racing suspension..defenatly a dif bike:)
« Last Edit: July 01, 2007, 11:57:03 PM by hyena426 »