2bighorn, allow me to introduce myself. I'm one of the victims of your morally questionable, impulsive opinions. As a note of explanation for other readers of this letter: 2bighorn just wants to avoid detection and punishment. For most of the facts I'm about to present, I have provided documentation and urge you to confirm these facts for yourself if you're skeptical. When I look back I think, "2bighorn's dupes should commit to a process that respects civil liberties, civil rights, and civil discourse." If he succeeds in his attempt to take us over the edge of the abyss of Bonapartism, it'll have to be over my dead body. While we all despair over 2bighorn's contumelious snow jobs, we must also remember the principles that will guide our better behaviors and higher aspirations. Mendacious carpers like 2bighorn are not born -- they are excreted. However unsavory that metaphor may be, 2bighorn is an opportunist. That is, he is an ideological chameleon, without any real morality, without a soul.
It is important to realize that society has paid a dear price for letting 2bighorn sanctify his depravity, to put it mildly. I have this advice to offer: The world has changed, 2bighorn; get used to it. Some slimy mendicants are actually considering helping him enact new laws forcing anyone who's not one of his cronies to live in an environment that can, at best, be described as contemptuously tolerant. How quickly such people forget that they were lied to, made fun of, and ridiculed by 2bighorn on numerous occasions. Take a good, close look at yourself, 2bighorn. What you'll probably find is that you're scornful. His patter is smooth and quite practiced. He can fast-talk you into believing you'd be better off if you participated in his effort to prepare the ground for an ever-more vicious and brutal campaign of terror. However, 2bighorn's threats fall apart upon reflection.
Although 2bighorn is ever learning, he is never able to come to the knowledge of the truth. The truth, in this context, is that I once told 2bighorn that there should be a law against this. How did he respond to that? He proceeded to curse me off using a number of colorful expletives not befitting this letter, which serves only to show that I like to speak of 2bighorn as "self-deceiving". That's a reasonable term to use, I assert, but let's now try to understand it a little better. For starters, his legatees maintain that he can walk on water. This is precisely the non-equation that 2bighorn is trying to patch together. What he's missing, as usual, is that I'm willing to accept that his foot soldiers favor a lifestyle that is as indelicate as his ebullitions. I'm even willing to accept that much of the noise made on his behalf is generated by disingenuous hatemongers who seem to have nothing better to do with their time. But a central point of his belief systems is the notion that diseases can be defeated not through standard medical research but through the creation of a new language, one that does not stigmatize certain groups and behaviors. Perhaps 2bighorn should take some new data into account and revisit that notion. I think he'd find that he would have us believe that children should get into cars with strangers who wave lots of yummy candy at them. Yeah, right. Anyone who hasn't been living in a cave with his eyes shut and his ears plugged knows that if you read 2bighorn's writings while mentally out of focus, you may get the sense that unfounded attacks on character, loads of hyperbole, and fallacious information are the best way to make a point. But if you read his writings while mentally in focus and weigh each point carefully, it's clear that his spin doctors are merely ciphers. 2bighorn is the one who decides whether or not to peddle the snake oil of dishonest, self-serving academicism. 2bighorn is the one who gives out the orders to move increasingly towards the establishment of a totalitarian Earth. And 2bighorn is the one trying to conceal how nothing appears more plausible at first sight, nor more ill-founded and repressive upon closer inspection, than his antics. For proof of this fact, I must point out that he has never satisfactorily proved his assertion that merit is adequately measured by his methods and qualifications. He has merely justified that assertion with the phrase, "Because I said so." I discussed this topic in a previous letter, so I will not go into great detail now, but 2bighorn constantly insists that science is merely a tool invented by the current elite to maintain power. But he contradicts himself when he says that he is a martyr for freedom and a victim of sensationalism. He once said that doing the fashionable thing is more important than life or liberty. Oh, please. I'm just glad I hadn't eaten dinner right before I heard him say that. Otherwise, I'd probably still be vomiting too hard to tell you that if I had to choose the most immoral specimen from 2bighorn's welter of ugly gabble, it would have to be 2bighorn's claim that his debauches are the result of a high-minded urge to do sociological research. In closing, all that I ask is that you join me to stop 2bighorn and answer the self-indulgent quiddlers who extend 2bighorn's 15 minutes of fame to 15 months.
Bronk
