ACLU likes SOME religions....

[McFarland]

Abe Lincoln said something similar: "America shall not be taken by outside forces, it shall be destroyed from within." I think it was Abe Lincoln, not 100% sure.

[john9001]

no, it was me, i just said it.

[McFarland]

Pretty sure Abe said it first. Unless you're over 150 years old.

[RedTop]

7:45 - 8:00 - Muslim prayer time

8:00 - 8:15 - English speaking time

8:15 - 9:30 - Quran 101 "Killing the infidels 101"

9:40 - 11:00 - Mexican History / Illegal Immagrations studies.

11:10 - 11:25 - Muslim prayer time / Smoke break / English speaking time

11:30 - 12:15 - Lunch / Backpack Explosive packing / Green card forgery

12:15 - 1:140 - Muslim extremist teachings / Fanatical killing

1:45 - 3:00 - Muslims and how they will rule the world

[McFarland]

3:00 - 4:00 Loading the buses for suicide driving training.

[Ack-Ack]

Originally posted by McFarland
This country was founded on those commandments.

No it wasn't.


ack-ack

[Ack-Ack]

Originally posted by McFarland
That's aboot the worst thing aboot them.

Canadian redneck?


ack-ack

[Holden McGroin]

quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Originally posted by McFarland
This country was founded on those <10> commandments.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Originally posted by Ack-Ack
No it wasn't.


ack-ack

Sure it was:  

1.  Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

2.  A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.

3. No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

4. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

5. No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

6. In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.

7. In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

8. Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted

9. The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

10. The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.


....

[bj229r]

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion

That small portion of the 1st amendment was construed by the SC to mean Christianity in any sort of public forum must be stamped out. Is SEEING the Ten Commandments posted in a public building the same sort of invasion to one's person as say, smoking in an elevator?

And does ANYONE here think the anti-religion types will start fighting back against Muslim efforts to inject itself into our daily lives? Thus far, in America and abroad, most seem to be bending over backwards to accommodate people who came from backward, 13th century countries, who want a better life. Unfortunately, their strict adherence to Islam is what made said countries backwards to begin with, and they are utterly blind to that.

[Chairboy]

So, under a voucher system, your tax dollars could be used to fund a Madrasah.  


Interesting.

[midnight Target]

Here is a little less .... psycho? .... report on what is REALLY going on.

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/metro/20070702-9999-1n2prayer.html

[Silat]

Originally posted by bj229r
OK, CAN't have Ten Commandments on the wall in a courtroom
CAN'T have a cross on a hill on public land (though it is a memorial to dead soldiers)
CAN'T allow Boy Scouts of America to use public land
CAN't allow kids to read Bible SILENTLY to themselves during break
CAN'T allow kids to have a 'Bible' club after hours on school property
(Could go on for some time here, but you get the idea..I'm waiting for Rosie O'Donnell to scream out "SEPARATION OF CHURCH AND STATE!"....but these types usually have naught to say in this area)

But apparently the ACLU DOESN'T have any sort of problem with public schools accommodating Muslims by  having prayer breaks, and removing any vestige of pork from school grounds???


 

link

What does this have to do with the ACLU? The ACLU doesnt do anything but fight for constitutional issues. And that is non partisan. You really need to read more. When this becomes a legal constitutional issue and they have the $ and time they will get involved. Donate and help them keep ALL religion out of the public square.
The rightwingChristianrepublicOn party wants Christianity everywhere and now you are upset when the Muslims are doing the same? Hypocrisy! We warned you but you wouldnt listen. You have got what you asked for.

[Silat]

Originally posted by bj229r
That small portion of the 1st amendment was construed by the SC to mean Christianity in any sort of public forum must be stamped out. Is SEEING the Ten Commandments posted in a public building the same sort of invasion to one's person as say, smoking in an elevator?

And does ANYONE here think the anti-religion types will start fighting back against Muslim efforts to inject itself into our daily lives? Thus far, in America and abroad, most seem to be bending over backwards to accommodate people who came from backward, 13th century countries, who want a better life. Unfortunately, their strict adherence to Islam is what made said countries backwards to begin with, and they are utterly blind to that.

Yes we will fight that. I dont want any religion in the public square. We moderates have been telling you religious types this for years. But no, you wanted Jesus in the public square. We warned you that it would come back to bite you. Now here it is and you are pissed. We were right and you were wrong.

[x0847Marine]

Originally posted by midnight Target
Here is a little less .... psycho? .... report on what is REALLY going on.

http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/metro/20070702-9999-1n2prayer.html

"In a letter, the religious-rights organization urged the district to broaden its accommodations to Christians and Jews by setting aside separate classrooms for daily prayer and to permit rabbis, priests and other religious figures to lead children in worship on campuses."

No Sheep leggin P.E gear for the Pagen kids? or after school animal sacrifice 101 for Satins worshipers?... weak.

Another case of politcal correctness run a-muck; to avoid "charges" of racism, the school made exceptions for one group of opinions, of course those with differing opinions have noticed and want their point of view, rituals, trinkets, phrases, plastic statues and invisible man to be part of the exceptions too.

Should the school accommodate every uber-natural opinion, "school" will go from a learning institution, to a religious freak show.

School "officials", not wanting to look like the hypocrites they are, will defend their decisions with what they believe to be a clever argument.. that will be transparently stupid... all in an attempt to hold onto whatever power their bureaucratic job affords them.

Lots of tax $$ will be spent in expensive court squabbles where all sides whine, and in the end... the exceptions made will be wiped out.

[Ack-Ack]

Originally posted by Silat
Yes we will fight that. I dont want any religion in the public square. We moderates have been telling you religious types this for years. But no, you wanted Jesus in the public square. We warned you that it would come back to bite you. Now here it is and you are pissed. We were right and you were wrong.

Did you watch the video of those two idiots that heckled the Hindu priest giving the morning prayer in the Senate?


ack-ack