Author Topic: Are CV's Too Strong  (Read 1525 times)

Offline LYNX

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2263
Are CV's Too Strong
« Reply #30 on: July 13, 2007, 09:53:38 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by LTARkilz
look up in your post.  USS Lexington, badly damaged by Japanese bombers and torpedo planes. does it say anywhere in that website that it was a torpedo that got the final blow or a bomber. yes i understand it burnt to hell and finaly burned long enough to die. but this happened at the hands of Japanese bombers and torpedo planes. so proving my statement that bombers did bomb cvs. now i will agree that this does not state that the boat died to bombers or torpedo planes both had a roll in this.


You are inferring that HEAVY bombers had a roll in this.  No heavy level bomber ever hit a CV on the open sea.

Offline SOB

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 10138
Are CV's Too Strong
« Reply #31 on: July 13, 2007, 10:19:38 PM »
You wanna make it easier to put the kibosh on one of the most fun aspects of this game?  Why don' t you just go bomb a fighter hangar or something?
Three Times One Minus One.  Dayum!

Offline stockli

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 157
Are CV's Too Strong
« Reply #32 on: July 14, 2007, 02:59:07 AM »
Funny thing about CVs, Im sure a couple 1000 lbrs on the deck would at least impede the launch of aircraft in real life.

Here, not so much.

I say we make RUNWAY and CV damage real in the game.

Holes in the runway, hard to take off, holes in the CV hard to take off.

Offline Slash27

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12798
Are CV's Too Strong
« Reply #33 on: July 14, 2007, 03:42:47 AM »
It took me 3 sets of on the deck suicide Lancs to kill a CV today. Ridiculous
 !!!!:(

Offline Rolex

  • AH Training Corps
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3285
Are CV's Too Strong
« Reply #34 on: July 14, 2007, 04:08:20 AM »
Put me down in favor of doubling CV damage, plus 2 torpedoes minimum required  required to sink it. :)

Offline Slash27

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12798
Are CV's Too Strong
« Reply #35 on: July 14, 2007, 04:25:07 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Rolex
Put me down in favor of doubling CV damage, plus 2 torpedoes minimum required  required to sink it. :)



They used those in WW2?:huh

Offline Rolex

  • AH Training Corps
  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3285
Are CV's Too Strong
« Reply #36 on: July 14, 2007, 04:37:09 AM »
Only as a last resort after dive bombing lancasters and 110s finished strafing carriers. I know it's true because I saw it on the internet. :cool:

Offline Slash27

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12798
Are CV's Too Strong
« Reply #37 on: July 14, 2007, 04:56:44 AM »
:D

Offline LYNX

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2263
Are CV's Too Strong
« Reply #38 on: July 14, 2007, 06:09:52 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Slash27
It took me 3 sets of on the deck suicide Lancs to kill a CV today. Ridiculous
 !!!!:(


This kind of gamey game play which I personally consider lowest of the low is why cv's in this GAME should be made 3 times as hard.

Yes we all know in real life CV's were sunk with much less ords than 8k but this is a game where fleets have to come close to shore.  Where there is no CV top cover most of the time because of the pressures to take a base.  None of which happened in real life.  

You wanna be a gamey punk then use what were used in real life like vals kates zero's.  You could do that all day long mate...as far as I'm concerned.  But Lancs and 110 strafing is .....well "Nintendo".

Offline Slash27

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12798
Are CV's Too Strong
« Reply #39 on: July 14, 2007, 06:44:21 AM »
it was a joke
« Last Edit: July 14, 2007, 07:31:47 AM by Slash27 »

Offline LYNX

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2263
Are CV's Too Strong
« Reply #40 on: July 14, 2007, 07:15:27 AM »
My sentiments still stand if only to reply to those that do suicide.

Offline Slash27

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 12798
Are CV's Too Strong
« Reply #41 on: July 14, 2007, 07:32:38 AM »
I'm on your side:D

Offline Grits

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5332
Are CV's Too Strong
« Reply #42 on: July 14, 2007, 07:51:28 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by LTARkilz
look up in your post.  USS Lexington, badly damaged by Japanese bombers and torpedo planes. does it say anywhere in that website that it was a torpedo that got the final blow or a bomber. yes i understand it burnt to hell and finaly burned long enough to die. but this happened at the hands of Japanese bombers and torpedo planes. so proving my statement that bombers did bomb cvs. now i will agree that this does not state that the boat died to bombers or torpedo planes both had a roll in this.


The "bombers" that helped sink the Lex were Val dive bombers off of the Zuikaku and Shokaku, not land based heavy bombers. The battle of Coral Sea was totally sea based. One clue as too how effective heavy level bombers were against ships, look at how long it took the RAF to sink the Tirpitz and it was AT ANCHOR sitting still.

Offline kilz

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3336
Are CV's Too Strong
« Reply #43 on: July 14, 2007, 08:00:27 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Slash27
It took me 3 sets of on the deck suicide Lancs to kill a CV today. Ridiculous
 !!!!:(



LMFAO what was that talk we had about this LOL just kidding bro:D
Former LTARkilz

R.I.P 68KO, TailSpin, Maj1Shot, Prop31st, SWfire, rodders, Vega, easy8, 11Bravo, AWMac, GMC31st, Stoliman, WWhiskey

Offline kilz

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3336
Are CV's Too Strong
« Reply #44 on: July 14, 2007, 08:03:29 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by Grits
The "bombers" that helped sink the Lex were Val dive bombers off of the Zuikaku and Shokaku, not land based heavy bombers. The battle of Coral Sea was totally sea based. One clue as too how effective heavy level bombers were against ships, look at how long it took the RAF to sink the Tirpitz and it was AT ANCHOR sitting still.



not trying to question you statement but can you show me where it says this. everything i have read so far has been bombers didnt say anything about dive bombers. like i said not questioning your statement i would just like to read up on it if you know where it says diffrent. :aok
Former LTARkilz

R.I.P 68KO, TailSpin, Maj1Shot, Prop31st, SWfire, rodders, Vega, easy8, 11Bravo, AWMac, GMC31st, Stoliman, WWhiskey