Originally posted by Nilsen
Nuke war = both sides lose.
In a conventional war it would depend on the objectives.
In a classic scenario the russians would overrun europe and the war would last for as many days as it would take for the russians and americans to agree that russia keeps europe.
Nuclear war = the whole world loses, not just the USA and USSR.
Conventional war would not only depend on what the objectives were, but also on how fast the US and Great Britain could get reinforcements to the battle field.
Three of the four Phantom squadrons at Seymour Johnson AFB were dedicated to reinforcing Europe. They had a commitment to be able to pack up spare parts, tools, technical manuals etc, configure the planes for a cross-atlantic flight, then unpack and reconfigure the planes for combat missions and actually flying combat missions within 72 hours. We practiced this stuff over and over and over until it just about made you want to puke even hearing about it.
The US military had lots of equipment prepositioned in Europe as well (I think they still do) to make the process even faster.
I'm just glad we never had to find out which side would have won a conventional war. Regardless of who would have won, casualties on both sides would have been terrible.