Originally posted by Viking
And what does international law and acts of war mean when it is a superpower that is acting against a tiny neutral country like Sweden?
[/b]
The same as always.
And that was ”less than a year” before the Swedish DC-3 was shot down … like you claimed?
Nit-picking semantics now are we? The incident where the US plane was damaged was less than a year before. The privateer getting shot down was more than a year before.
So, who’s misinformed? You as usual.
Actually Viking, I know quite alot about this, while you are googling your way to knowledge. See Ive actually worked with trying to find the DC-3. Ive spent days in Swedish archives going over all the documents there is on this incident. See I used to work for a wreck-salvaging company before I went to the court, and we were looking for the DC-3 because it would be an enormous PR-win if we found what the Swedish navy had been unable to find for 50+ years.
So Ive read the documents, including the radio-logs for those days. So I know for example that after the shoot-down of the Catalina, all Swedish naval units and aircraft were ordered to shoot on sight if any soviet fighter appeared. Yes, shoot on sight, not fire if fired upon, or fire if they make any hostile movement...fire on sight. Thats how tense the situation was, and you didnt know that.
I also know where the soviet submarines were sighted off Gotland those days, and I know which destroyers found which oil-spills and where. And I know WHY the DC-3 were out that day.
Want to know why Viking?
Because the Soviets had just launched a brand new cruiser, the Sverdlov, and it was on manuevers together with a bunch of soviet fleet units off Estonia. Everyone wanted the fingerprints of the Sverdlov radar, so therefore we were out that day.
Now, back to google little tard. Check the dates to see when the Sverdlov was launched, check the internet for information about what type of ship the Sverdlov was...google your way to knowledhge and then you can come back here and pretend you knew all these things already.
And mind you I never mentioned anything about a ”Baltic route” or ”in the same area”.
No, but I did.