Author Topic: 5.1 surround head set  (Read 982 times)

Offline llama

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 819
      • http://www.warrenernst.com/
5.1 surround head set
« Reply #15 on: August 14, 2007, 12:18:46 PM »
And it gets even better if you also have a TrackIR, which I do.

In addition to Fugitive's excellent description of different power levels fooling your hearing, if you have TrackIR, you *can* tilt or turn your head, even minutely, and the surround sound speakers "swivel" the noises all around you.

So, for example, if you only *think* you hear something behind you, just wiggle your head a little bit and you can hear the noise move from your 6-low to your 7-low to your 5-low and back to 6-low.

In most games the center channel helps you zero-in on low versus high sounds.

It really is amazing, actually. I would never have bought the TrackIR (I won it), and I would never have bought the surround sound headphones (XMas Gift from Wife - boy does she know me), but now that I know what they can accomplish together, I would buy them again in a heartbeat.

-Llama

Interesting server at 69.12.181.171

Offline kvuo75

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3003
5.1 surround head set
« Reply #16 on: August 14, 2007, 03:37:13 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by The Fugitive
kvuo75, if the enemy is coming at you from the right rear, the right spaeker gets a bit more power, and in llama setup seeing as you have 4 speakers in each ear, they adjust the power in each to fool the ear into hearing from which ever direction they need.

Have you never tried surround sound? gone to a movie theater recently?


Yes, we're talking about headphones though.  If you only had 1 ear, do you think you could tell which direction anything was coming from in a headphone? no matter how many speakers were in it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sound_localization

going back to my surround sound earbud, if you had an earbud with a "front half" and a "rear half". do you think your ear could tell front from rear?
« Last Edit: August 14, 2007, 03:42:31 PM by kvuo75 »
kvuo75

Kill the manned ack.

Offline llama

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 819
      • http://www.warrenernst.com/
5.1 surround head set
« Reply #17 on: August 14, 2007, 09:12:23 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by kvuo75
If you only had 1 ear, do you think you could tell which direction anything was coming from in a headphone? no matter how many speakers were in it.


I doubt it, but since I have two ears, I can.

I bet you could to.

I'm not really sure what you're getting at here, other than being obstinate. There are about a million review of surround sound headphones and 5.1 speaker setups you can look at over the internet. As a professional hardware and software reviewer myself, I can assure you that I would like nothing more than to publish a review stating that expensive hardware didn't do what it was advertising. I can't find a single review like that for the Medusa 5.1 headpone set.

Next you'll be telling us that 3-D Imax films aren't really 3D because they wouldn't work for people with one eye...

-Llama

Interesting server at 69.12.181.171

Offline kvuo75

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3003
5.1 surround head set
« Reply #18 on: August 14, 2007, 10:16:30 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by llama
I doubt it, but since I have two ears, I can.

I bet you could to.

I'm not really sure what you're getting at here, other than being obstinate. There are about a million review of surround sound headphones and 5.1 speaker setups you can look at over the internet. As a professional hardware and software reviewer myself, I can assure you that I would like nothing more than to publish a review stating that expensive hardware didn't do what it was advertising. I can't find a single review like that for the Medusa 5.1 headpone set.

Next you'll be telling us that 3-D Imax films aren't really 3D because they wouldn't work for people with one eye...

-Llama


Remember, the plural of anecdote is anecdotes, not evidence. Reviews are anecdotes.

The "audiophile" community is rife with testimonials about sound. As someone with some experience in music, and recording music, I've learned a bit about sound. I've learned that the "audiophile" community is rife with weirdo beliefs about the physical world which have no scientific basis. Either as a religion, or regret, when they spend $2K on speaker cables,  they will not change their minds. I have no idea.  Nevertheless.

You have two ears, two eardrums. Since "hearing" is the perception of the eardrum vibrating from oscillating sound pressure, we just need to make each eardrum vibrate. The real world, loudspeakers, headphones, anything. There are only two membranes you need to agitate, your eardrums.

We can process the actual signal quite easily with modern computers. delay, change phase, introduce effects, etc. etc. etc. We can model the filtering of the outer ear, etc. etc. etc. All we need to do is get that processed signal directly to your eardrum with a minimum of outside influence.

NOW,

Earbuds IN the ear = $10?

Cheapo headphones = $20?

Surround headphones = $50+?
kvuo75

Kill the manned ack.

Offline BoilerDown

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1926
5.1 surround head set
« Reply #19 on: August 17, 2007, 04:30:52 PM »
I have surround headphones.  I plug it into my sound blaster using three 1/8in jacks, one for front left and front right, one for rear left and rear right, and one for center/sub.

I also have a senheiser (sp?) stereo headset.  I've tried it in both stereo mode and in simulated 3D modes which various games and the sound blaster itself offers.

The surround headphones are much more convincing.  I do hear sounds that apparently are coming from around me, just like my 5.1 home theater setup.  So regardless of whether you think its possible or not, I'm telling you that it works, and works a hell of a lot better than stereo headphones, even good quality $120 stereo headphones like the ones I bought.  

And I paid ~$60 for the surround headphones, broke them 2 years later, and bought another of the exact same model to replace them, which I'm still using to this day, in many many games, now including Aces High.

So to sum up, surround headphones really do work, they work with Aces High, and IMO they are worth the money.
Boildown

This is the Captain.  We have a lil' problem with our entry sequence so we may experience some slight turbulence and then... explode.

Boildown is Twitching: http://www.twitch.tv/boildown

Offline llama

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 819
      • http://www.warrenernst.com/
5.1 surround head set
« Reply #20 on: August 17, 2007, 06:13:58 PM »
Boiler,

Well I appreciate another data point, but Kuvo is quite convinced we're all insane, and will classify your post as "another anecdote."

I have the suspicion that Kuvo will soon be telling us that all the bumblebees we see flying are figments of our imagination since the physics of flight say bumblebees can't fly.

Really, I'm tired of trying to explain things to this guy.

BTW, boiler, what model did you buy? I'd like to recommend a less pricey set to my nephew.

-Llama

Interesting server at 69.12.181.171

Offline kvuo75

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3003
5.1 surround head set
« Reply #21 on: August 17, 2007, 10:03:26 PM »
Aside from my earlier points, Skuzzy says in early in the thread:

"Aces High does not use Dolby surround encoding. The game uses true 3D sound positioning via DirectSound. No encoding is needed for this. Just FYI."

and,

"If the headset depends on Dolby 5.1 encoding to work, then the surround mode will not work in Aces High II."

AHII produces 2 channels of audio. Somehow you're getting 4 or more? Where are they coming from? Magic?  

And I'm the idiot?
kvuo75

Kill the manned ack.

Offline BoilerDown

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1926
5.1 surround head set
« Reply #22 on: August 18, 2007, 02:45:42 AM »
Um... Dolby 5.1 isn't the only way to do surround sound perhaps?
Boildown

This is the Captain.  We have a lil' problem with our entry sequence so we may experience some slight turbulence and then... explode.

Boildown is Twitching: http://www.twitch.tv/boildown

Offline llama

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 819
      • http://www.warrenernst.com/
5.1 surround head set
« Reply #23 on: August 18, 2007, 10:38:10 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by kvuo75
Aside from my earlier points, Skuzzy says in early in the thread:

"...The game uses true 3D sound positioning via DirectSound...


And that's all a 5.1 sound system needs to do it's thing.

And a word about anecdotes and magazine/online reviews:

If you're so willing to dismiss all reviews about 5.1 surround sound headphones working as anecdotal, then would you also be willing to dismiss a review claiming that they *didn't work* as anecdotal? If not, why not? At what point does an overwhelming ratio of work/doesn't work reviews become evidence in your eyes.

And along those lines, please provide for me a URL to a reviewer that says the 5.1 surround sound system they reviewed didn't actually provide surround sound, so that we may determine if it is an anecdote or not. True, I only spent 5 minutes on google looking for one, but I didn't locate one.

Note that audiophile products, such as moster cables, are a very good example. For every breathless review about how good an audiophule product is, you can almost always find some, if not many, reviews or articles stating how pointless such products are, or you'll find studies about how a sampling of tested listeners can't determine the difference between two things, one being "reviewed as super" and one "normal" item.

You simply won't find negative articles about 5.1 headphones, or studies about how listeners can't tell the difference. Why is that, do you think? I would suggest it is because 5.1 headphones work as advertised.

In the end, I think it comes down to you complaining about a product being "impossible" to work without actually testing it with your own two ears.

-Llama

Interesting server at 69.12.181.171

Offline BoilerDown

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1926
5.1 surround head set
« Reply #24 on: August 18, 2007, 11:41:16 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by llama
Boiler,

BTW, boiler, what model did you buy? I'd like to recommend a less pricey set to my nephew.

-Llama


I use http://www.xoxide.com/ltb-ac97-51-surround-headphones.html

but it seems its now out of stock.  I recall paying about $60 for it.

It looks like this is the follow-up product to it:  http://www.xoxide.com/ltb-magnum-51-ac97.html

I only link XOxide because they have nice pictures btw, not endorsing them.

Mine uses the USB jack for power only, no data flows through it.  And that's the only flaw, since USB power picks up noise from the computer.  So I bought a $8 USB powered hub and plugged it into that.  Works great.  But the new version comes with a AC/DC converter so you don't need that any more.
Boildown

This is the Captain.  We have a lil' problem with our entry sequence so we may experience some slight turbulence and then... explode.

Boildown is Twitching: http://www.twitch.tv/boildown

Offline DAVENRINO

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1084
5.1 surround head set
« Reply #25 on: August 19, 2007, 10:45:11 PM »
I have never tried 5.1 headphones but the sound positioning is definitely correct from my 7.2 surround setup.  I did have to switch from my Audigy 2 ZS back to the onboard sound to make this happen; though.  I send a 5.1 Dolby signal from my PC to the receiver and it is converted to 7.1 Dolby Digital EX.
DAVE aka DJ229-AIR MAFIA
CH USB HOTAS/ONKYO 705 7.2 SURROUND SOUND/ 60" SONY A3000 SXRD  TV

Offline VonMessa

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 11922
5.1 surround head set
« Reply #26 on: August 23, 2007, 02:20:13 PM »
Not to take any one side of this issue, Here is my 2 cents.  I work professionally in the sound reinforcement industry, and the things that can be done with today's technology is amazing.  Yes, as humans, we have only two ears, but that is not where it ends fortunately.  The brain, although very complex and powerful, CAN be fooled.  Simple example is a movie theater (go see an action flick to experience this)  The other would be a concert hall, or house of worship, etc.  The trend today is to have wide, and fairly shallow venues (think twice as wide as it would be front to rear).
 
     In these cases, to get true stereo (or surround) seperation is a battle.  If you sit on the exterme right or left of the auditorium you are closer to one speaker than the other.  To combat this the new designs are a LCR setup (Left-Center-Right) with the center cluster having speakers that point left, center, and right. All of the speakers fire off at different times.  A basic example is that you, as the listener, are on the far right, you would normally hear sound from the right speaker first because it is closer.  With the DSP technology today, that sound from the right can be delayed (measured in milliseconds even) as the center cluster fires off it the left ear  so that the listener's brain is fooled into thinking that both sides arrive at the same time (most newer home theatre systems now have this delay option to make up "perfect"  mounting).  Also if the room is fairly deep front to rear you may notice another cluster (or two) hanging from the ceiling towards the rear of the room (i.e. in front of the listeners in ther balcony)  these are also typically delayed or synched with the other speakers in the room.  This is so you see and hear the action at the same time because you are farther from stage than the rest of the audience.  e.g. a drummer hits the snare drum and you hear the sound at the same he/she puts the stick on the drum head unlike seeing a flash of lightening, then hearing the thunder.

     In "surround headphones" there are five (or six) different speakers angled at you ear canal in different ways.  Keeping this in mind the DSP software can fire off different speakers at different times.  Although there is no true distance/time = speed arithmetic involved, your brain "perceives" space, dimension and distance.  As far as bass/sub-bass freqs. are concerned, they are non-directional and that is the reason for them being on the outside of the phones' most of the time.  So if you have an ugly sub at home, stick it behind the couch, or better yet, in the corner(facing it) and you will notice no difference.

  I apologize for being so verbose, but this is the simplest way I can describe it, without getting into doppler effect, and how the Digital Signal Processers actually work, and so on.


Quick add-on:  If the signal going to your phones, stereo, etc is not a 5.1 (or other ype of signal i.e. Aces HIgh2), then you will not get TRUE channel seperation as you would with a proper signal.  This is not to say that they will not work, or even somewhat sound like 5.1, but that it will not be TRUE surround sound.

     Thanks for (ahem) listening.
« Last Edit: August 23, 2007, 02:30:59 PM by VonMessa »
Braümeister und Schmutziger Hund von JG11


We are all here because we are not all there.