Author Topic: Articles of Impeachment (Read 1162 times)

x0847Marine · « **Reply #45 on:** August 13, 2007, 02:50:32 PM »

Quote

Originally posted by crockett

Regardless if it's politics or what ever.. not being open minded and willing to hear both sides of an argument is rather a naive thing to do.

Outstanding video. Bruce Fein is a "righty" who served Regan & wrote the articles against Clinton... he's more knowledgeable about the constitution than anyone here by miles. In the video he sheds his party affiliation puts the country 1st calling for articles of impeachment against Dick & Bush... not necessarily to kick them out of office, but to put them in check.

Here's another great video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6BEsZMvrq-I

Dick Cheney, in 94, making the case that toppling Saddam with US troops would result in a "quagmire" with Iran butting in... he knew then what would happen, yet his most clever efforts prevented none of it.

See Dick plan, see Dick fail... don't be a Dick.

Mr No Name · « **Reply #46 on:** August 13, 2007, 03:08:04 PM »

Nothing to impeach for except his refusal to protect the nations border. That is a duty specifically required in the Constitution. If the articles of impeachment have this on it, i am all for it.

otherwise... move on

Holden McGroin · « **Reply #47 on:** August 14, 2007, 12:43:41 AM »

President in the wings Pelosi has stated that Impeachment is off the table.

Quote

Bill Moyers
I don't see asny strong evidence that the Democrats are playing the way you think Congress should be playing.

Quote

Bruce Fein
That is correct but it doesn't exculpate the President that Congress has not decided to sanction his excesses

Bruce Fein, the man on Moyers show who advocates congress consider impeachment, realizes this argument is purely academic.

crockett · « **Reply #48 on:** August 14, 2007, 12:59:26 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by x0847Marine
Outstanding video. Bruce Fein is a "righty" who served Regan & wrote the articles against Clinton... he's more knowledgeable about the constitution than anyone here by miles. In the video he sheds his party affiliation puts the country 1st calling for articles of impeachment against Dick & Bush... not necessarily to kick them out of office, but to put them in check.

Here's another great video:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6BEsZMvrq-I

Dick Cheney, in 94, making the case that toppling Saddam with US troops would result in a "quagmire" with Iran butting in... he knew then what would happen, yet his most clever efforts prevented none of it.

See Dick plan, see Dick fail... don't be a Dick.

Damn man not sure how I missed your post on this video. I posted the same vid after you in another thread. lol

crockett · « **Reply #49 on:** August 14, 2007, 01:02:00 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Mr No Name
Nothing to impeach for except his refusal to protect the nations border. That is a duty specifically required in the Constitution. If the articles of impeachment have this on it, i am all for it.

otherwise... move on

Did you watch the video? These guys as x0847Marine said, both know a tad bit more about the US consitution than any of us. They seem to make some pretty arguments for it.

Holden McGroin · « **Reply #50 on:** August 14, 2007, 01:04:23 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by crockett
They seem to make some pretty arguments for it.

Is that like pretty flowers?

crockett · « **Reply #51 on:** August 14, 2007, 01:04:37 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Holden McGroin
President in the wings Pelosi has stated that Impeachment is off the table.

Bruce Fein, the man on Moyers show who advocates congress consider impeachment, realizes this argument is purely academic.

I think he understands that Congress likely wont do it. I think he was making the point that they should and that Pelosi was failing in her job to the American people.

crockett · « **Reply #52 on:** August 14, 2007, 01:05:35 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by Holden McGroin
Is that like pretty flowers?

pretty good argument .. is what I meant..

Holden McGroin · « **Reply #53 on:** August 14, 2007, 01:25:54 AM »

Quote

Originally posted by crockett
I think he understands that Congress likely wont do it. I think he was making the point that they should and that Pelosi was failing in her job to the American people.

So then he understands that this is all just a waste of time.

john9001 · « **Reply #54 on:** August 14, 2007, 07:35:42 AM »

read between the lines.

he is saying "look, we can't really impeach bush, so lets do the next best thing, elect Hillary in 08 and keep control of congress"

Hap · « **Reply #55 on:** August 14, 2007, 10:06:40 AM »

I would be very dissapointed with Dems & Repubs if they carry this out, as I was dissapointed in the Repubs big time when they did the same thing 8+ years ago.

During Watergate the wrongs done matched Congress' actions.

The other two examples = "We're mad as all get out, so here's what we're going to do."