« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 6   Go Down

Author Topic: The Superfortress  (Read 3034 times)

Offline bigrich

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 174
The Superfortress
« on: August 29, 2007, 02:13:53 PM »
i want the B-29 superfortress that is the biggest bomber ever in WW2
Logged
fear the FW-190 D9
And the Butcher Bird(190 A-8)

Offline Jack16

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 786
The Superfortress
« Reply #1 on: August 29, 2007, 02:28:30 PM »
This has been asked for many times before. And every time, the discussion ends up talking about putting nukes in the game as well. So, i don't think it will be put in the game any time soon. :aok
Logged

Offline Tiger

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 766
The Superfortress
« Reply #2 on: August 29, 2007, 02:36:28 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Jack16
This has been asked for many times before. And every time, the discussion ends up talking about putting nukes in the game as well. So, i don't think it will be put in the game any time soon. :aok


Why'd you have to bring up the nukes?  Now you've ruined this thread.


I'd like to see the 29 added too...  BUT, it really wouldn't fit the current AH environment.  Maybe in 2 weeks when CT is done and we see how gameplay eveolves there, the 29 may be revisited and gel well with CT gamepley styles.
Logged

Offline bigrich

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 174
The Superfortress
« Reply #3 on: August 29, 2007, 02:56:15 PM »
well the only thing you would use the 29 for is high level bombing above 30,000ft. and hardly any fighter can reach them and the atomic bomb wouldn't be allowed in by HTC it has teh strenght of over 20,000lbs. of tnt
Logged
fear the FW-190 D9
And the Butcher Bird(190 A-8)

Offline Jack16

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 786
The Superfortress
« Reply #4 on: August 29, 2007, 03:08:31 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Tiger
Why'd you have to bring up the nukes?  Now you've ruined this thread.
I'd like to see the 29 added too...  


I'd like to see the b-29 too. And I didn't ruin this thread. If I haven't brought up that nukes were mentioned every time, someone else would have. ;)
Logged

Offline PanzerIV

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 742
      • http://17thawsquad.aowc.net/main.asp
The Superfortress
« Reply #5 on: August 29, 2007, 03:29:40 PM »
B29, fast and a huge load!
Would deserve a heavy perk in the MA, plus didn't it have lead computing turrets?
Logged

Offline whiteman

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4206
The Superfortress
« Reply #6 on: August 29, 2007, 03:36:19 PM »
30k LOL, you know it would be the ultimate CV dive bomber. Honestly i think it would be cool but understand the problems it would cause.
Logged

Offline PanzerIV

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 742
      • http://17thawsquad.aowc.net/main.asp
The Superfortress
« Reply #7 on: August 29, 2007, 03:37:33 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by whiteman
30k LOL, you know it would be the ultimate CV dive bomber. Honestly i think it would be cool but understand the problems it would cause.

lol
Logged

Offline Latrobe

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5975
The Superfortress
« Reply #8 on: August 29, 2007, 03:45:41 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by bigrich
well the only thing you would use the 29 for is high level bombing above 30,000ft. and hardly any fighter can reach them and the atomic bomb wouldn't be allowed in by HTC it has teh strenght of over 20,000lbs. of tnt



Glad to see not everyone who  joined in August of 2007 is stupid (sorry). I'm not saying they're stupid as in can't do math, read, write, and are dumb. More like askin for P-80's, nukes, V-2's, all jet game, and just don't know what they're talking about.

The B-29 would be an excellent addition. Have a good payload, great alt, and best of all perked. Be a great bomber to use up those thousands of perks we've piled up.
Logged

Offline Bosco123

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3604
The Superfortress
« Reply #9 on: August 29, 2007, 04:04:25 PM »
HTC will not have this type of airplane because of two reasons:

1. too big of a payload, they will not have anything past 4000 pouns so why have it.

2. the people who use dial-up will be murder with the B-29. I am not a dail-up, but I know that the B-25 is killing everyone now.
Logged
Skifurd AKA "Bosco"
Unmanned Aerial Systems (UAS) Operator
United States Marine
"Stay ahead of the game, Stay ahead of the plane."

Offline PanzerIV

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 742
      • http://17thawsquad.aowc.net/main.asp
The Superfortress
« Reply #10 on: August 29, 2007, 04:18:55 PM »
kinda dumb how the B25s 75mm essentially tracks the shell forever.
Logged

Offline Latrobe

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 5975
The Superfortress
« Reply #11 on: August 29, 2007, 04:28:41 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Bosco123
HTC will not have this type of airplane because of two reasons:

1. too big of a payload, they will not have anything past 4000 pouns so why have it.

2. the people who use dial-up will be murder with the B-29. I am not a dail-up, but I know that the B-25 is killing everyone now.



Doesn't the LANC have 14 1,000lbers? and HT said no "bomb" over 4,000lbs will be added not payload.

How will it "murder" people with dial-up? I have dial-up (or i will when we make another account. They lost our old one).
Logged

Offline Bronk

  • Persona Non Grata
  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9044
The Superfortress
« Reply #12 on: August 29, 2007, 04:33:45 PM »




:noid :noid :noid
Sorry had to.
Bronk:D
Logged
See Rule #4

Offline moneyguy

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 933
The Superfortress
« Reply #13 on: August 29, 2007, 06:18:34 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Bronk




:noid :noid :noid
Sorry had to.
Bronk:D





:rofl :rofl :rofl  everytime i see it
Logged

Offline Jack16

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 786
The Superfortress
« Reply #14 on: August 29, 2007, 06:41:13 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Bronk




:noid :noid :noid
Sorry had to.
Bronk:D


:D :rofl :D
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 ... 6   Go Up
« previous next »