Author Topic: difference between 109 G-14 and 109 K-4  (Read 2972 times)

Offline sethipus

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 304
difference between 109 G-14 and 109 K-4
« on: August 30, 2007, 03:20:30 PM »
They're the same ENY value, and both have a version that has 2x13mm machine guns and 1x30mm tater gun.  So armament is comparable.

Does anyone know what the substantive differences are between the G-14 and the K-4?  And in terms of performance in AH?

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
difference between 109 G-14 and 109 K-4
« Reply #1 on: August 30, 2007, 03:21:54 PM »
The K4 is very fast and climbs better. The G14 turns slightly better.

Offline JimBeam

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 322
difference between 109 G-14 and 109 K-4
« Reply #2 on: August 30, 2007, 03:33:57 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Motherland
The K4 is very fast and climbs better. The G14 turns slightly better.


what he said and g14 has different gun packs.
JimBeam 367th "Dynamite Gang"

"In my experience JimBeam never goes down easy" -wil3ur

Pilots...looking down on people since 1903

Offline BigPlay

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1044
difference between 109 G-14 and 109 K-4
« Reply #3 on: August 30, 2007, 03:42:27 PM »
K model was designed for bomber interception . It has a pressurized cockpit and has better high alt performance, kinda like the FW190 high alt version the TA152.  The G models were funny, the G10 came after the G14

Offline JimBeam

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 322
difference between 109 G-14 and 109 K-4
« Reply #4 on: August 30, 2007, 04:22:33 PM »
wasnt the g10 the fastest of the 109s?
JimBeam 367th "Dynamite Gang"

"In my experience JimBeam never goes down easy" -wil3ur

Pilots...looking down on people since 1903

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
difference between 109 G-14 and 109 K-4
« Reply #5 on: August 30, 2007, 04:23:09 PM »
The K-4 has a better engine that's also geared for higher alt work (it's way better at 25k than the G14 is!) but did not have as many weapons options as the G-14 did. The G-14 was fairly close to the K-4 under 16k, but a bit slower (this means it also climbed a little slower, and accelerated a little slower) -- but it still is close to the K-4.


Take the K-4 for speed and climb. Take the G14 for weapons options and turn rate. That being said, you can still turn with the K-4 and you can still climb and run with the G14. One's just better suited than the other.

Offline Motherland

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 8110
difference between 109 G-14 and 109 K-4
« Reply #6 on: August 30, 2007, 04:34:38 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by JimBeam
wasnt the g10 the fastest of the 109s?

The G10 was the fastest Gustave.

Offline PanzerIV

  • Nickel Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 742
      • http://17thawsquad.aowc.net/main.asp
difference between 109 G-14 and 109 K-4
« Reply #7 on: August 30, 2007, 06:56:14 PM »
Bf109K was made to simplify the logistics of the Bf109 series.

Offline MiloMorai

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6864
difference between 109 G-14 and 109 K-4
« Reply #8 on: August 30, 2007, 07:49:40 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by Krusty
The K-4 has a better engine that's also geared for higher alt work (it's way better at 25k than the G14 is!) but did not have as many weapons options as the G-14 did. The G-14 was fairly close to the K-4 under 16k, but a bit slower (this means it also climbed a little slower, and accelerated a little slower) -- but it still is close to the K-4.

What is the FTH of each?

Offline Nilsen

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 18108
difference between 109 G-14 and 109 K-4
« Reply #9 on: August 31, 2007, 02:17:56 AM »
G14 has class, the K4 is a german runstang :D

Offline TUXC

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 257
difference between 109 G-14 and 109 K-4
« Reply #10 on: August 31, 2007, 07:47:42 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by MiloMorai
What is the FTH of each?





FTH of versions we have in game:

109k-4    ~22000ft
109g-14  ~16000ft


At WEP k-4 is 10-20mph from 0-16k then 40-50mph faster at higher alts. Climb at WEP is similar for both up to 16k, and above that the k climbs better. Without WEP the differences are more pronounced and the g-14 is no better than a 1943 109g-6, but with WEP it's very capable at low to medium altittudes.

http://www.gonzoville.com/ahcharts/index.php?p1=109g14&p2=109k4
« Last Edit: August 31, 2007, 08:49:55 AM by TUXC »
Tuxc123

JG11

Offline Krusty

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 26745
difference between 109 G-14 and 109 K-4
« Reply #11 on: August 31, 2007, 08:35:09 AM »
Thanks, tux, you beat me to posting that link :D

Interestingly enough, the G-14 beats the K-4 for climb below 5k. Just barely, but still interesting to note.

Offline Charge

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3414
difference between 109 G-14 and 109 K-4
« Reply #12 on: September 05, 2007, 04:09:43 AM »
"K model was designed for bomber interception."

Yes, just like the 190A8... ;)

-C+
"When you wish upon a falling star, your dreams can come true. Unless it's really a giant meteor hurtling to the earth which will destroy all life. Then you're pretty much screwed no matter what you wish for. Unless of course, it's death by meteorite."

Offline Xasthur

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2728
difference between 109 G-14 and 109 K-4
« Reply #13 on: September 05, 2007, 08:57:47 AM »
Quote
Originally posted by JimBeam
wasnt the g10 the fastest of the 109s?


IIRC it was roughly 20 mph slower than the K4
Raw Prawns
Australia

"Beaufighter Operator Support Services"

Offline Meyer

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 156
difference between 109 G-14 and 109 K-4
« Reply #14 on: September 07, 2007, 12:02:38 AM »
"It has a pressurized cockpit"

Also, like the 190 A-8 :D