To make it complete,
tank destroyers by definition are basically "poor man's tanks", mounting the biggest possible gun on the smallest possible chassis. This usually results in limited offensive value, like decreased armor or absence of a revolving turret. They are compromises which sacrifice offensive or defensive capabilities in order to max out their firepower, silhouette and or armor protection.
There have been to approaches in WW2.
One is the concept of having a tank-like design with a big gun inside a revolving but open topped turret, like the M10, M18 and M36. All have rather light armor but increased speed and due to their open tops increased SA, but reduced survivability.
The second one is the self propelled anti tank gun. A big gun mounted to the chassis of regular tank designs, but without a revolving turret. The has their gun mounted inside a limited traverse and elevation cradle, usually where very low silhouette and frontally very heavily armored.
Example are the StugIII, StugIV, Jagdpanther, SU-85, SU-100, Elephant (which is a bit of an exception to the rule to use common tank chassis), Nashorn (which doesnt have low silhouette nor heavy armor, but mounts a 88mmL71, the gun of the later Kingtiger plus advanced firecontrol to a Panzer IV chassis) and many others.
Sabot is a nickname for under-calibre armor piercing rounds. Like already mentioned by others, technically it is the sorrounding cage, not the projectile itself. Sabot as a nickname nowadays is basically only used by US nomenclature and only for APFSDS rounds. The british call the same type of round "Fin" by tanker parlance, "KE" in german tanker parlance.
Regards,
Matt