Author Topic: Britain more stringent on immigration than US?  (Read 787 times)

Offline bj229r

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6735
Britain more stringent on immigration than US?
« on: September 09, 2007, 10:42:34 AM »
link

Quote
LONDON SUNDAY TELEGRAPH

LONDON — Tens of thousands of immigrant workers will be forced to learn English before they are allowed into Britain under a plan Prime Minister Gordon Brown is expected to announce tomorrow in a speech to the Trades Union Congress in Brighton, informed sources revealed yesterday.

The rules, expected to reduce the number of people entering Britain by at least 35,000 a year, will affect those from countries outside the European Union who are seeking to work and settle permanently in Britain.

"Those who we welcome into the UK to work and settle here need to understand our traditions and feel that they are part of our shared national culture," Home Secretary Jacqui Smith said. "They need to integrate into our country, learn English and use our language."

Mr. Brown's aides said the initiative will form a "key plank" of the Labor Party government's new policy on immigration. It will be seen as another shift to the right following the prime minister's moves to block supercasinos and to review the decision to reclassify cannabis as a less dangerous drug.


Quote
Under the government's new "points" system, there are three main categories of immigrants coming to Britain from outside the European Union to work — highly skilled, skilled and low-skilled workers. The first two groups eventually can settle permanently in Britain; the third group cannot.

Ok...the LEFT in Britain is more right-ish on immgration than OUR right....? Obviously this doesn't address illegal immigration, which I imagine isn't as big a deal there....but in US we don't even PROD them to learn our language, we instead make OUR people learn theirs....no long-term good can come from not learning how to blend in with your new country.
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers

http://www.flamewarriors.net/forum/

Offline tikky

  • Copper Member
  • **
  • Posts: 280
Britain more stringent on immigration than US?
« Reply #1 on: September 09, 2007, 11:28:05 AM »
To carry this incredibly racist and laughable idea even further, why not weed out the ones who are too hard to understand after they've learned the language? Why not require them to take speech lessons so they'll sound just like them? Then, if they have dark skin, require them to bleach it to an acceptable caucasian shade? Then, force them to dress like proper English people, eat bland food, change their religion to one handily chosen for them, and...well, you get the idea.:aok
« Last Edit: September 09, 2007, 11:31:16 AM by tikky »

Offline Maverick

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 13958
Britain more stringent on immigration than US?
« Reply #2 on: September 09, 2007, 11:34:36 AM »
Tikky,

You really need to try to think outside the race card there.

There is nothing racist about the proposal. There is nothing aimed specifically at any group of people or even religion there. They are just requiring an immigrant speak the language of the land. They don't care what color they are or what church they go to.

As far as keeping a lid on immigration better than the USA does, that's pretty darn simple compared to the States. They don't have 2 huge contiguous borders that anyone can walk across. Being an island makes it quite a bit easier.

It will be interesting to see how this plays out.
DEFINITION OF A VETERAN
A Veteran - whether active duty, retired, national guard or reserve - is someone who, at one point in their life, wrote a check made payable to "The United States of America", for an amount of "up to and including my life."
Author Unknown

Offline bj229r

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 6735
Britain more stringent on immigration than US?
« Reply #3 on: September 09, 2007, 11:35:48 AM »
Quote
To carry this incredibly racist and laughable idea even further, why not weed out the ones who are too hard to understand after they've learned the language? Why not require them to take speech lessons so they'll sound just like them? Then, if they have dark skin, require them to bleach it to an acceptable caucasian shade? Then, force them to dress like proper English people, eat bland food, change their religion to one handily chosen for them, and...well, you get the idea.

I LIKE the way you think:noid  
Yup, the Brit govt is a buncha racist pigs, and should be MUCH nicer to the people coming to their country and trying to blow it up and convert it to Sharia law---What's wrong with wanting perspective LEGAL immigrants to have some sort of marketable skill which is useful in your country? Australia has been that way for years. Bring in endless dirt-poor 3rd world people who can't even read and write in their OWN language, much less ours, and the likelihood is they will be end up being yet another burden on taxpayers
Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers

http://www.flamewarriors.net/forum/

Offline moot

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 16333
      • http://www.dasmuppets.com
Britain more stringent on immigration than US?
« Reply #4 on: September 09, 2007, 12:58:45 PM »
Anything short of renaming Great Britain "Babel" would be racist!
Hello ant
running very fast
I squish you

Offline cpxxx

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2707
Britain more stringent on immigration than US?
« Reply #5 on: September 09, 2007, 01:25:05 PM »
It's an idea but the majority of immigrants to Britain at the moment come form Europe. They won't be covered by that requirement. Most to be fair already speak English or a form of it.

This will only apply to non EU members. I just can't imagine Australians been able to cope with learning how to speak proper English and as for Americans;) :p

Joking aside there have been some mad instances of language stupidity. I remember seeing a piece on British TV of a local council providing one to one counselling on quitting smoking to a Turkish woman at the taxpayers expense. Bad enough, you think? It gets worse, her counselling was in Turkish!  She was really quite offended when the reporter suggested it was ridiculous, claiming it was her right!

I think there has been a general hardening of views in places like Britain with big immigrant populations.  As they say they really do need to understand  traditions and feel that they are part of a shared national culture. Anything else is a recipe for trouble.

Here in Ireland, we're new to the problem but we want to avoid Britain and America's mistakes. The last thing we need in a small country is ghettos. Lately there was a minor fuss, when a Sikh who trained as a police reservist was told he couldn't wear a turban on duty instead of the official uniform hat. The government stood it's ground. Indeed many Sikhs actually agreed with the stance.

There shouldn't be any discrimation but we should respect our own rules and traditions. After all, most of us who have travelled to foreign countries with peculiar traditions are often warned how to behave.  We should expect no less when they arrive here too.

Offline john9001

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9453
Britain more stringent on immigration than US?
« Reply #6 on: September 09, 2007, 01:39:13 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by cpxxx

 After all, most of us who have travelled to foreign countries with peculiar traditions are often warned how to behave.  We should expect no less when they arrive here too.



that be the truth.

Offline Fishu

  • Gold Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 3789
Britain more stringent on immigration than US?
« Reply #7 on: September 09, 2007, 03:10:36 PM »
Quote
Originally posted by cpxxx
Here in Ireland, we're new to the problem but we want to avoid Britain and America's mistakes. The last thing we need in a small country is ghettos. Lately there was a minor fuss, when a Sikh who trained as a police reservist was told he couldn't wear a turban on duty instead of the official uniform hat. The government stood it's ground. Indeed many Sikhs actually agreed with the stance.


Too bad our government isn't doing much anything to avoid the problems that can be clearly seen in our neighboring country Sweden. The people in general are in different mindset than our politicians. Always when someone talks against the "rights" of the immigrants in the public it'll end up in the media with lots of accusations of racism. Nobody dares to decline anything from the minorities for being afraid of losing public imago, whether it was the immigrants or our very own highly privileged finn-swedish minority.

The ideology of multiculturalism is as bad as communism - Neither will work in the real world.

Sometimes even our minorities disagree with our "flower hat aunties". The most recent case was when our largest national newspaper, Helsingin Sanomat, examined some thirty Thai massaging places. All but one of the places offered sex services without the customer asking for it - Even the one place which didn't did offer sex services when asked.

This led to some questions on whether there's something bad in our soecity, when some immigrants are selling sex services for living and what could be done to improve their situation. The matter was made worse by the fact that in Thailand prostitution is illegal (although usually ignored in many places) and that led to a conclusion that it's a cultural issue - Thai culture is strongly against prostitution. Nobody of course asked the Thai's themselves (and in most cases it would been useless to ask such a thing from our immigrants, which I will get into later).

Soon after the Finnish Thai society came to media and said "the Finnish community shouldn't change, but we [Thais] should adapt". That's something that every immigrant should do when moving to a different country. This is the reason why I respect asians much more than any of the other major groups that have immigrated to Finland as refugees.

Asians are hardly ever in the headlines in a negative manner, especially when the headlines are about rape or violence. Neither do they constantly whine about racism or insist new rights from us. It's also more common to see asians with finns than the middle easterners or africans. Which of the latter are mostly seen with finnish women (and the possible marriage mostly ends in divorce. Gee, what a surprise, the black men from Africa weren't as good as they were exotic!).

Of the immigrants somali refugees from Africa (or just africans, because many have lied their country of origin. It's very common in Europe) are the worst. There's hardly ever anything good about them in the headlines. Usually it's about rape and violence. The worst is that the crimes by somalis usually happen to random people who cannot in any way avert the situation. Such random violence has been nearly non-existant in Finland. Typically violence happens between two intoxicated persons or persons who know each others from before, making it an avoidable situation most times.

That's the scary thing, every black guy on the streets, especially those in groups, can be a bad sign. We can't even have convicted somali criminals deported because that's supposedly racistic! Some people believe there's been a lack of help for the refugees and we've failed to support them to adapt into our society. Therefore we should do more to support them (a.k.a spend more money to fulfill our duty to uphold their rights).

How come some minorities have problems to adapt while some have adapted and are well respected? Of course these flower hat aunties are in the mindset that the problem is always in the majority and minorities are victims by default. For an example in Sweden 30% of the rapes have been committed by immigrants of muslim origin; Of course there are alot less muslims in Sweden than 30%.

I would say that too much help for the refugees leads to problems with adapting. They'll only adapt to ask more, because human by nature is never satisfied when it's possible to have more.
« Last Edit: September 09, 2007, 03:21:12 PM by Fishu »

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Britain more stringent on immigration than US?
« Reply #8 on: September 10, 2007, 08:41:28 AM »
seems pretty simple... if you like the language and traditions of one country over another then you should be in the country who's traditions and language you like the most.

lazs

Offline Tac

  • Platinum Member
  • ******
  • Posts: 4085
Britain more stringent on immigration than US?
« Reply #9 on: September 11, 2007, 12:31:21 AM »
my god. I've been in this forum for more than 5 years and this is the first time...


the first time!


I've seen Lazs say something ...


Deep.


(and intellectual).


;)



I agree 100% with Lazs :aok

Offline eddiek

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1442
Britain more stringent on immigration than US?
« Reply #10 on: September 11, 2007, 08:20:53 AM »
I agree with lazs, too.

I can understand wanting to make a better life for you and your family, I got no problems with that.  But if you wanna live in another country to do so, you need to observe and adapt to that country's traditions and culture.
I work with several Mexican nationals, two of whom are on my crew.  Neither speaks English very well, although both claim to understand it.   Both are reasonably good workers, but the language barrier does present a problem, when you need a task done and they go and work on something completely different and you lose time because of equipment being down unnecessarily.
Right now, my job is to take care of all the mechanical stuff on my rig.  I diagnose the problems and try to fix it unless it is beyond my skills or if we just don't have the right tools to complete the repair.
In the not too distant future, it looks like I will have my own crew.  I've already spoken with the toolpusher and told him my outlook and viewpoint on the situation, and what I told him probably sunk my chances of becoming a driller:  Anyone who works on my crew will speak understandable English, and understand it, or they won't work for me long.  
Why?  Simply put, the risk of getting someone injured or killed because a member of the crew could not or did not understand orders given to them is too great.  If a well kicks or there is a blowout, seconds count, literally.  We conduct weekly blowout drills, and even after 18 months, the two hands who aren't so fluent in English either do the wrong thing, or claim they didn't understand what they were supposed to do when an order was given.
That won't work for me.  I told my toolpusher that if I was responsible for the lives of my crew, plus a multimillion dollar piece of equipment, and the blame for failure or loss of life or equipment was going to rest on my shoulders, everyone would speak the same language, or they could and would be transferred ASAP.
Is that racist, to want a safe work environment?  I don't think so.  
Flame away, I don't care.......walk a mile in my shoes before you judge me........

Offline Swoop

  • Plutonium Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 9180
Britain more stringent on immigration than US?
« Reply #11 on: September 11, 2007, 08:32:17 AM »
Firmly agree.


Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Britain more stringent on immigration than US?
« Reply #12 on: September 11, 2007, 08:38:27 AM »
wow tac.... thanks!

Now if you ever say anything bright... we will be even.

lazs

Offline JBA

  • Silver Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 1797
Britain more stringent on immigration than US?
« Reply #13 on: September 11, 2007, 08:50:59 AM »
Meanwhile in the US

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/09/09/AR2007090902033_pf.html


we hold Presidential debates in SPANISH


Sept. 9 -- The first presidential forum ....conducted in Spanish placed a couple of the Democratic participants in an uncomfortable position .....answering tough questions while simultaneously fiddling to make sure their earpieces didn't fall out and they could the hear the translation of the next question.

...... questions focused on immigration, and the seven participants exhibited little difference on the issue, with all supporting changes that would allow illegal immigrants now in the country to stay .....................and all criticizing anti-immigrant sentiments. ........
"They effect the march of freedom with their flash drives.....and I use mine for porn. Viva La Revolution!". .ZetaNine  03/06/08
"I'm just a victim of my own liberalhoodedness"  Midnight Target

Offline lazs2

  • Radioactive Member
  • *******
  • Posts: 24886
Britain more stringent on immigration than US?
« Reply #14 on: September 11, 2007, 02:22:40 PM »
an alien who is here illegally is not an immigrant.  he is simply a criminal.

We do have immigrants here but they are not the same thing.

lazs